You've never heard of anyone taking a ptarmigan or a hare with a .375.....well, I reckon perhaps your world experience is a bit lacking, pard.
For one thing, most modern centerfire sporting rifles zeroed at normal ranges, say, out to 200 yards or so, will strike VERY close to the point of aim out to at least thirty yards, and make rather effective treatment on such small critters, if the noise isn't an issue. A little prior experimenting will quickly show what the close-range trajectory looks like, and make small-game targets very "do-able" (but not on body shots!)
I HAVE taken ptarmigan and hare with heavy-caliber rifles on occasion. Not with a .375, because I've never yet owned a rifle in that caliber, but with .270, .30-06, .303, .308, .338, and BIGGER calibers such as the .416 Rigby and .404 Jeffery. Also used the .44 and .41 magnums in revolvers on ptarmigan and grouse, both with shot loads if I had them, and with full-power cast bullets if I didn't.
More to the point, I do a LOT of handloading with my own cast bullets, and that can really make a rifle into a full-spectrum instrument. Even heavy-caliber rifles can be loaded for QUIET effective performance on small game, if the handloader knows what he's about.
So... do you really think that an all-round Alaskan rifle should be selected on the basis of its usefulness on small game? Living where you do, that surprises me. I know a lot of experienced Alaskan resident hunters, and to a man, they carry rifles which will work with NO compromise on the biggest critters they might encounter. Smaller stuff still dies just as dead, too.
I doubt that Mr. Griz will be impressed when we pop him with something too light for the job at close range. However, it's an individual choice and it'll be the individual's problem if such arises. Hope not! For my part, I'd still take along something which I absolutely know is capable of working on big animals under the worst of conditions. The policy saved me considerable potential grief over a lot of years in the North. Note that BULLET CHOICE has huge effect here. I'd rather have a .30-06 with Barnes TSX bullets than a .375 with a Sierra! Naturally, the .375 with a heavy TSX is better yet....
MY ideal candidate rifle would probably be a .338 much like this Savage I lucked into last year, but I wouldn't lose much sleep if it was a Ruger or Remington or ???? Stainless and synthetic make a lot of sense in that climate.
For one thing, most modern centerfire sporting rifles zeroed at normal ranges, say, out to 200 yards or so, will strike VERY close to the point of aim out to at least thirty yards, and make rather effective treatment on such small critters, if the noise isn't an issue. A little prior experimenting will quickly show what the close-range trajectory looks like, and make small-game targets very "do-able" (but not on body shots!)
I HAVE taken ptarmigan and hare with heavy-caliber rifles on occasion. Not with a .375, because I've never yet owned a rifle in that caliber, but with .270, .30-06, .303, .308, .338, and BIGGER calibers such as the .416 Rigby and .404 Jeffery. Also used the .44 and .41 magnums in revolvers on ptarmigan and grouse, both with shot loads if I had them, and with full-power cast bullets if I didn't.
More to the point, I do a LOT of handloading with my own cast bullets, and that can really make a rifle into a full-spectrum instrument. Even heavy-caliber rifles can be loaded for QUIET effective performance on small game, if the handloader knows what he's about.
So... do you really think that an all-round Alaskan rifle should be selected on the basis of its usefulness on small game? Living where you do, that surprises me. I know a lot of experienced Alaskan resident hunters, and to a man, they carry rifles which will work with NO compromise on the biggest critters they might encounter. Smaller stuff still dies just as dead, too.
I doubt that Mr. Griz will be impressed when we pop him with something too light for the job at close range. However, it's an individual choice and it'll be the individual's problem if such arises. Hope not! For my part, I'd still take along something which I absolutely know is capable of working on big animals under the worst of conditions. The policy saved me considerable potential grief over a lot of years in the North. Note that BULLET CHOICE has huge effect here. I'd rather have a .30-06 with Barnes TSX bullets than a .375 with a Sierra! Naturally, the .375 with a heavy TSX is better yet....
MY ideal candidate rifle would probably be a .338 much like this Savage I lucked into last year, but I wouldn't lose much sleep if it was a Ruger or Remington or ???? Stainless and synthetic make a lot of sense in that climate.