Indeed. But even worse was the Moderator's attempt, once the reality of the problem had become the 600 pound gorilla in the bedroom, to mitigate his bad call by calling it "a supply chain problem."
This was exactly that, a supply chain problem. You people can be all sanctimonious and pat yourselves on the back all day long. But you had no, none, nada, zero effect on the outcome.
A congressional inquiry was filed last Thursday by Georgia Arms. DOD responded in four working days. If you believe that all the wasted bandwidth on the internet had anything at all to do with this, you haven't got a clue about how the system works.
You might note that no mainstream RKBA organization picked up on this. Why do you think that was? It was because no one knew what really happened. As of this writing no one has been able to produce a written memorandum or message of any type requiring the change and the change back. Doesn't anyone think that is rather odd? Things like changes to Demil codes aren't done verbally.
Everyone with sense, the NRA, GOA, CCRKBA all waited to find out what really happened before they jumped in. Why because they didn't want to look like fools and expend political capitol over what was most likely a bureaucratic foul up.
All of your calls and emails and whining, wailing and gnashing of teeth on the internet accomplished nothing more then Georgia Arms first inquiry would have. By the time everyone got going, the issue was well on it's way to being resolved.
It's now 5 days since the original issue surfaced. Most of the inquiries you all demanded from your representatives are just now making their way into legislative liaison offices at DOD. If you think that your representative picks up the phone and calls some general at the Pentagon and chews butt, you're wrong. A nice letter is composed by a staffer, it's approved by the representative, then it's mailed to the appropriate legislative liaison office, where it goes through channels to the agency that can answer the congressional inquiry. Then the agency looks into it, figures out what happened and either acts to correct the problem, so it can tell the representative what happened and that it's been corrected, or draft a reply explaining what was done and why they will continue to do it that way.
It's always real smart to jump to conclusions and raise all kinds of hell before you even know what is really happening.....
It's always the best policy to find out what really happened before you jump in with both feet and make a fool of yourself. I guess that's a minority view around here.