I too have an Armi San Paolo (Euroarms) '58 Remington, and I rather like it. Mine does not have the purplish finish, but it did have the overly stiff mainspring. I replaced that with an Uberti mainspring, which required only minor fitting (the bottom part needed to be slightly narrowed). Much better. I would say that, overall, the ASP is as well made as the Uberti (which I also have). The ASP has a little more delicate build, compared to the Uberti, which is most noticeable in areas such as the slightly thinner top strap. The grip doesn't bother me since I have relatively small hands.Armi San Paolo attempt at an 1858 Remington---
This poor orphan suffers from an overly thick mainspring, clubbed hammer and a purple complexion, which is muted in the photo by the green background. There is something off with the grip as well. During firing, the Remington grip batters my second finger somewhat, even in the excellent Pietta I posted elsewhere; this one hurts when I am merely trying to hold it's nose up. What's a little pain, anyway?
Not sure but I think the double diamond logo was the manufacturing mark for MOFRA in Italy and imported by Replica Arms.
Let us know the specifics when you get it.In a couple weeks I am going to try for a square backed Dragoon with "Address Sam Colt" marks on top of the barrel and Armi San Marco under it. If it's a mutt, I want it.
That cylinder should have been rejected as completely defective. Look at the bottom chamber in your picture and see how thin the chamber wall is, compared to the others. The chambers are not drilled concentric to the arbor! And the distances between chambers appear to be random.You don't need a micrometer to notice the top chamber in the pic is way out of line!
I agree with not continuing to fire it with this cylinder. But I would still recommend buying another cylinder for it, brass frame or not. It's a nice 1851.I would suggest finding another cylinder, but considering that this is a brass-framed gun, the effort would not be worth it. Certainly with the cylinder in that condition, I would not continue to fire it.
Yeah, they all spit a little lead, but the one was the worst. Like I said, I was only shooting it once a year anyway. Maybe I'll have to look for another cylinder.That cylinder should have been rejected as completely defective. Look at the bottom chamber in your picture and see how thin the chamber wall is, compared to the others. The chambers are not drilled concentric to the arbor! And the distances between chambers appear to be random.
I would suggest finding another cylinder, but considering that this is a brass-framed gun, the effort would not be worth it. Certainly with the cylinder in that condition, I would not continue to fire it.
What is that purple finish?....I just got one like that.Pietta brass frame stepped cylinder .44 with Dragoonish barrel---
View attachment 774676
Is this a copy of some Confederate type?
The poor girl spent the last eleven years locked in a gun bag with a paper packet of activated charcoal powder. When finally removed from this environment, the victim was found to have powdered charcoal deposited everywhere on and in her person. Detailed cleaning revealed a slight genetic mutation which causes the hand to deflect off the cylinder axis on the way up, but this does not interfere with timing and lock up, so the Doctor is going to leave it alone.
Armi San Paolo attempt at an 1858 Remington---
View attachment 774677
This poor orphan suffers from an overly thick mainspring, clubbed hammer and a purple complexion, which is muted in the photo by the green background. There is something off with the grip as well. During firing, the Remington grip batters my second finger somewhat, even in the excellent Pietta I posted elsewhere; this one hurts when I am merely trying to hold it's nose up. What's a little pain, anyway?
-----krinko
A rare and beautiful find!OK, here's the Colt/ASM 1st Model Dragoon---