The Paper I Wrote For a Class (It's about Guns)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,719
Location
Western Missouri
Okay, I want your impressions. This is an essay I had to write for my Lit. & Comp class. It's supposed to be a narrative of a life-changing event. I couldn't come up with anything that I really wanted my teacher to know.... except for this. Tell me what you think.





How I Became Armed

I am pro-gun, but I wasn’t always pro-gun. I’m not who you’d normally think of when you think “gun owner,” being a suburban, bi-racial college student. That being said, I am a member of the NRA, and shoot about once a month.

It all started when I was 13 years old. I had been studying history since I could read. At this point, I’d discovered World War II, and had also discovered the Holocaust. I’d read about the death camps, the furnaces, and Nazi racial ideology. I read about the evil that swept across Europe, and wondered how a civilization as advanced as Germany had been drawn to the evil ideas of Hitler.

A much more important question to me was how six million people were killed by so few. The Einsatzgruppen, the unit of the SS tasked with killing the Jews (and later with herding them to the death camps), never numbered more than fifty thousand in number, and that is a very, very high figure. How did fifty thousand kill six million?

History books handled logistics, and dates, but not how the Holocaust was done. I stumbled across the answer by finding the Nazi Weapon’s Law of 1934. The already minimally armed Jews of Germany were prohibited from acquiring guns. This law made the wholesale murder of six million Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirables” possible in a very short time by an industrialized nation.

At 13, I was changed. I thought about the sheer number; the massive scale. The power of an industrial giant using scientific means to kill millions of it’s own people. And the reason why was vastly more simple than anyone had said in my studies. They were unarmed.

However, it wasn’t just them, over the next few weeks, I read about Russia, and China; about Turkey, and Cambodia. In each case, a population without weapons (or with them) was disarmed, and prohibited from getting weaponry. Then, a wholesale slaughter began. All in total one hundred million human beings have been killed by governments in the 20th century alone.

I imagined myself at the edge of a mass grave, a soldier standing above my emaciated body. He readied a pistol to kill me. I lived the experience in my mind, and it haunted me, more than anything else ever has. This event happened countless times throughout the 20th century. Who knows how many times some version of it occurred before that?

I immediately began to read all I could about guns, their history, their mechanical function, their use. It became an obsession, one that was very irritating to my parents, lifelong pacifists. But, despite their objections, within the year, I fired a gun for the first time with my late Grandfather. He showed me how to shoot his rifles and his old Smith & Wesson revolver. For the first time, I felt the power and responsibility of being armed. It was an amazing feeling that I will keep with me for the rest of my life, and one of my proudest moments, only to be eclipsed by one later at 18. It was then that I bought my first gun and joined the estimated eighty million Americans that own one or more guns.

I think back to that moment, caught in the pages of books, obsessed with a question I had no answer for. I’ve often thought of all the people who have died because they didn’t have the means to protect themselves; people who died because those with power unleashed a plan to violate their most basic right as humans, the right to life, by first taking away the means to defend it.

My ownership of guns is a tribute to those untold, and largely unknown millions. Every shot I take is a promise. In this nation, the only one which has written it’s acknowledgement to the right to self-defense into it’s constitution, I will always be armed. I will never be disarmed, and the phrase “from my cold dead hands” isn’t just a catchphrase, it’s a way of life. I will pass this legacy on to my children when they come. It all began with the victims. They didn’t die in vain.



(It's actually double spaced, and all the other things that they want for a college paper, but I had to put it this way for it to work here)
 
Last edited:
HA! Once wrote a paper on gun control. Got a B (professor was from Croatia). She wrote little notes disagreeing with me. Got an A on every other paper I wrote in that class.
 
Not too bad, on the whole. But change these things:

...never numbered more than fifty thousand [STRIKE]in number...[/STRIKE]

… kill millions of it’s own people … [lose the apostrophe here and the other two times it's misused: strangely enough, it's = it is, and the possessive form you want is merely its, sans apostrophe – likely a hasty typo]

However, it wasn’t just them, over the next few weeks... [make this two sentences to avoid a comma splice]

… disarmed, and prohibited … [here you have an extraneous comma, the result of a dependent clause]

All in total one hundred million... [put a comma between “one” and “hundred”]

I lived the experience in my mind, and it haunted me, more than anything else ever has. [Given the context of this piece, saying that you lived the experience in your mind is redundant, so rephrase that. Your choices are to go short or to go long. Short: “This moment haunted more than anything else ever has.” Long … that's up to you. :) On something like this, though, short is probably the order of the day.]

... keep with me... [“remember” is a shorter way of saying this]

...a question I had no answer for. [ending with a preposition, here, so rephrase it for propriety: “a question for which I had no answer.”]

I’ve often thought of all the people who have died because they didn’t have the means to protect themselves; people who died because those with power unleashed a plan to violate their most basic right as humans, the right to life, by first taking away the means to defend it. [This is a good bit, but it can be better by some snipping: I’ve often thought of all the people who[STRIKE] have[/STRIKE] died because they didn’t have the means to protect themselves; people who died because those with power [STRIKE]unleashed a plan to[/STRIKE] violated their most basic right as humans, the right to life, by first taking away the means to defend it.]
 
I fired a gun for the first time with my late Grandfather -- strike the late, if you mentioned him a second time you could add "who has since passed away"


Correct spellings bolded:


In this nation, the only one which has written an acknowledgment to the right to self-defense into its constitution



Pretty good. Overall, I like it. You may want to add what it felt like the first time you fired a gun, or an important discussion you had with your parents about it if you need more words.
 
I don't know how your teacher feels about contractions but if you want to play it safe for full formality you should expand them all, even when it seems a bit awkward.

I might also suggest making it a little lighter in tone and not so aggressive. I agree that an armed populace is better able to defend itself but if I were a neutral reader who didn't know much about gun politics I'd be pretty put off by being beaten over the head with the repeated genocide references. Subtlety works better for persuasion and is much easier to read. I'm sure you don't want to do any major rewriting and I understand that feeling completely but hypothetically if you were to write on the same topic again I think it would work better if it focused more on how firearms are a positive part of your life than how others have historically suffered from lacking weapons.

And...German Jews were formally barred from firearm ownership in 1938, not 1934.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Germany#The_1938_German_Weapons_Act
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entwaffnung_der_deutschen_Juden
 
When I took Comp 2, I had to write a paper about a problem in the world and my solution to fix it. My topic was gun free zones. My professor told me to stop my powerpoint in the middle of my presentation (needless to say she was an anti). Three hours later, I get a call from my Department Chairperson asking me to come in for a meeting. The next day, I get to her office and she's asking me if I've ever brought guns to school, either on my person or in my vehicle, etc. Nothing happened after that, but my professor acted strangely toward me for the rest of the term.

Your paper is benign and shouldn't make anyone uncomfortable. Just try not to write one about students and teachers carrying concealed or how unsafe everyone is on campus.
 
Your paper is benign and shouldn't make anyone uncomfortable.

Um, I don't think this will be seen as benign:

I will never be disarmed

It became an obsession

I will always be armed.

I bet the professor will read as much into these as they want to. If they freak out, the email sent to the chair of the department, the dean, and campus security will have all that highlighted. Imagine this:

"I have a student who is self-described as being obsessed with guns, and admittedly always carries a gun on them, and refuses to never carry a gun on them. I am scared for my life. What are you going to do about it?"

If they freak out about it, your life may become painful. I think it may be beneficial to throw in something about how you carry only where legal, and follow all laws etc etc. Just something to think about.
 
Unfortunately, I agree with Tim. The problem paragraph is...
I immediately began to read all I could about guns, their history, their mechanical function, their use. It became an obsession, one that was very irritating to my parents, lifelong pacifists. But, despite their objections, within the year, I fired a gun for the first time with my late Grandfather. He showed me how to shoot his rifles and his old Smith & Wesson revolver. For the first time, I felt the power and responsibility of being armed. It was an amazing feeling that I will keep with me for the rest of my life, and one of my proudest moments, only to be eclipsed by one later at 18. It was then that I bought my first gun and joined the estimated eighty million Americans that own one or more guns.

underlining is my emphasis, not yours.

As much as I like the topic, I would avoid such things unless it presents both pro and anti- views to some degree. I would avoid making it too personal and write in the third person (it and they....).

But when I was in college, I would have done something like this and probably got a 'D' for my efforts. The professor runs the show. It is just not worth screwing with your GPA.
 
OP - don't get me wrong, I think this is something that you can do well. I just think it may be prudent to edit out things that may be alarming to your professor. It may help your grade, and it may help you avoid some other hassles.
 
I think the paper is well written, but I agree with Tim. I would leave out the words like "obsessed". You also have no reason to point out to your proffesor that you are always armed. This will be taking a chance. I know how college's are about this sort of thing. (I'm sitting in the library at the largest technical college in Arkansas typing this right now. lol)
 
Quote:
All in total one hundred million... [put a comma between “one” and “hundred”]
OR between "total" and "one"?

Oops. Yes. Dang. Now I'm editing my own editing. Perils of long hours.

Nonetheless, I agree with the other posters that the word "obsessed" seemed a poor choice in today's college environment, that the matter of "responsibility" could be amplified, and that the OP could explain why a given moment was, indeed, "one of my proudest." Timelines and other particulars of the assignment remaining unknown, I chose to skip a tutorial.

By the way, when is this assignment due? What's your word/page count? Is this your first essay for the class (even an evaluative one, perhaps?), or is this just your first narrative essay? Have you been asked to include any specific narrative techniques?

Whatever the case, good luck, and may you not be unfairly labeled.
 
I think it's a good start, but agree with Tim. Unless you know your professor REALLY well, and they know there is nothing wrong with you this is probably going to ruffle some feathers. What I read out of this was "the events in history books have scared me into being obsessed with the raw, awesome power of GUNS". If you want to be edgy and discuss firearms with your most-likely liberal, anti-2A professor you need to be doing it through an paper supported by facts, not personal opinion.

If you're really set on this topic, I have some suggestions.
1. Include some brief opposing views. It's important to show the reader that you recognize differing opinions on the issue.
2. Shorten that puppy up. Lots of flowery language in there. Less is more, and draws the reader's attention to the content of your paper, not the verbage.
3. Write about what you do to support 2A rights (activism, education, etc.). Being armed as an individual does nothing to further a cause that is "life changing" for you without activism.

As I said, you have a good start but I'd like to see you tone down the emotion, step up the facts, and tell a little more about what you're doing to support your beliefs BESIDES arming yourself.
 
Update:

My teacher did talk to me about this, and it did cause an issue. She asked me why I chose to write on this topic.

I told her that I could have done the first time I fell in love, or the day my grandfather died, but it would have been.... common. Those events have happened to a huge number of people. And, the other couple of life changing events in my life are something I don't want to tell anyone about.

She is an anti.... boy did I find that out.

She said she just wants to be sure that I don't carry at school, (which is a HUGE no-no), and which I told her I never do. (which is true).

Um.... and then, she asked me to describe my first time shooting, or my parent's aversion. She said it was well written, but perhaps a little boring in the history part.... I told her that's how it happened, but that I will re-write it to talk more about both my first time, and my parent's issues with it.

All in all, I should have written about the first time I fell in love.
 
Bravo!

IMO, those statements ARE benign, since they aren't being used to target a single person in a pre-existing argument.

They stand alone as an identification of personal philosophy. If someone else feels targeted by those statements, they've missed the entire gist of the paper.

It's sad when you can't use 'obsessed' as a colorful descriptor referencing a newly-discovered freedom and hobby. Why does it always have to go to the shrink. Jeez.
 
Sorry to hear it go that way mordechai. As a general rule I completely avoid the topic of RKBA when it comes to my papers. I even go so far as to not wear my shirt with guns on it. I don't want the hassle.
 
Nice job.

I would change the title to something like, "The day I found (discovered) the Second Amendment". In any event, drop the word "armed" from the title". It starts the reader on the wrong path. Sounds militant. I don't disagree with anything else has suggested here.

Missed your update. Too late.
 
Last edited:
I applaud you. College campuses and faculty are notoriously liberal. Won't hurt em to hear the truth from time to time.
 
I applaud you. College campuses and faculty are notoriously liberal. Won't hurt em to hear the truth from time to time.

exactly. what kind of education are you receiving if you have to pre-screen your content to make sure it's not going to offend someone ? Isn't college all about probing around and learning ? This whole anti-gun schtick bugs me; a college is supposed to be open exchange.

Perhaps you can do your next paper on "SSRI's and Rampage Shootings; connection ?"
 
Good paper, follow what Mikhail Weiss said about corrections.

This semester I wrote about the National Park Carry Law in my law class.
 
Hey now, I've had some great, long discussions with highly liberal professors about all sorts of topics, including firearms, and come away all the better for it. It helps if both parties are willing to have a polite discussion, and have plenty of time to devote to it. I'm thinking of one professor in particular, with whom I pretty much didn't agree with on a single topic, yet I'd go into his office for something quick, and the next thing I know, we've been talking for almost an hour.

Stereotyping goes both way, you know, as much as many of them are true, it doesn't hurt much (normally) to test the waters politely. Granted I'm at a techy school, so it might be different. Still, no need to be overly worried, as long as you present yourself in a polite, reasonable fashion. (Think what the name of this site is, and thats a good thing to keep in mind.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top