What actually strikes me the most in this discussion is not the press check and whatnot.
It's this compulsion ..
I'm going to assume this was directed at me and throw a response out here. I'm also going to assume you're not talking about the mechanics of the various ways one can check the condition of a firearm; rather you're talking about when and why one checks to see if a firearm is loaded.
There seem to be two extremes in this discussion: I check the condition of a firearm essentially every time I touch it, whereas easyg loads his once and trusts that it's loaded whether it's on his bedside or on his hip. Easyg seems happy with his setup -- "I loaded it, and I'm certain nothing has changed in the hours/days/weeks/months since I loaded it, and I'm willing to bet my life on the accuracy of both my memory and the fact that nothing else has happened to change the status of my weapon."
I think this is being a bit more complacent than is prudent. The consequences of being wrong about the condition of a gun can literally be
death. "Accidental discharges" almost always happen with weapons someone was sure were unloaded, but the consequences of pulling a self-defense pistol only to discover there's no round in the chamber (or worse, that the magazine wasn't even loaded in the pistol) are equally harsh.
It is important to determine the condition of the pistol one is handling. It's also important to re-determine the condition of a pistol if one becomes distracted. Here's a quick example of where our different approaches might play out differently:
Let's say you work dry-fire drills in the hope that your skills are increasing rather than decreasing between classes, as all of us should. You unload your carry pistol, insure it's safe however you feel the need, and start your dry fire exercises. In the middle of this your wife calls, and you spend too much time on the phone talking about mom, Thanksgiving plans, and something-or-another that's on the Honey Do list that you didn't really pay attention to last time either. Now, before you go back to dry-fire practice do you recheck the pistol, or not?
I say yes -- I was distracted, I'm fallible, and I'm not willing to risk the consequences of a negligent discharge over the second it will take to check the status of the pistol. Easyg says "no" -- he knows he unloaded his arm and there are no gremlins in his house to change the status of his pistol.
Do you check? Why or why not? Is that being overly paranoid, or is it taking an unnecessary risk?
Here's another one. You get home, unholster your gun, leave it on the coffee table beside your bed, and go to sleep. You awaken to the sound of breaking glass, and against the advice of the folks in the S&T forum you decide to investigate. As you pick up your pistol, do you check its status just to be sure, or do you simply trust that it's loaded as you didn't remember unloading it?
In each case, the consequences for being wrong may be huge, and the cost to make absolutely, positively, no-doubt-about-it-
sure is about one second of your life.
To me there's an obvious choice. Every time I pick up, put down, holster, or unholster an arm I check. If I'm handling one and I get distracted, I check.
Call it compulsive, OCD, paranoid, superstitious, or whatever you want. I'd much rather err on the side of caution here.
Edit: Actually, I take that back. As I think back I don't tend to check the condition when I unholster, though I think I probably should as a general rule.