The M16 family of weapons is what many that have served in the military have used, and they have become far more common than in the past partly due to the desire to have and use arms they are familiar with.
I really liked your post, Malamute. And I think it shows a great deal of insight. Thank you for it.
The only sentence in your entire post I disagree with is the one I quoted. You see, I was familiar with a number of guns before I ever went in the service. Yes, while I was in, I became quite familiar with the M16. But I got out of the service in 1972, and didn't buy an AR15 until last year, just before the election. Yes everyone - I know I made a dumb mistake. So let's not harp on it, okay?
Anyway, getting back to my point - I was familiar with a few guns before I went in the service, I became familiar with M16s (and M60s) while I was
in the service, and I became familiar with a lot
more guns after I left the service. But I've never been interested in ARs, other than the political crap about them. I don't think my experiences are all that out of the ordinary either. Oh yeah, I'm pretty sure there are some folks who never even touched a firearm before they went in the service, so after they got out and wanted to buy a gun, they bought one similar to the one they learned with. But that doesn't apply to me, and I could be wrong, but I just don't think it applies to the majority of other gun owners either.
One thing I'm pretty sure of - given the chance, my 16 year old grandson would trade my pre-64, Model 70 Winchester for a cheap AR15 in a heartbeat. But that's only because to my 16 year old grandson, ARs are more fun. I'll be long gone before
any of my grandchildren have a chance to trade off any of my guns though. So I don't worry about that.