I'm not talking about preventing defects. I'm talking about offering a higher level of fit & finish than Marlin has historically provided. But there is also a blurred line here as well. Because of all the valid issues that have come up during the Remlin transition, people are much more critical than in the past. Flaws that would have been overlooked or not even seen as flaws in the past are now grabbing folks' attention. Which was the point I was trying to make in my first post. Marlin has never bothered to match forends to buttstocks. They have always left machine marks on receivers, had uneven finishes on the receiver sides and spotty wood to metal fit. It was always acceptable for their price point. Now that they are more critical, they think these issues are new when in fact, they were always there. They just didn't notice before, or care.
Do I need to take detailed pictures of my JM Marlins to illustrate?
I even remember when the anniversary 39 came out with fancy wood and an octagon barrel. I was appalled that it had the same rough machine work as the rest, for double the price I paid for my 94/22's.