the USDA needs what?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread isn't about firearms, it's just another tin foil hat infused rant against our own government.

Exactly right.

-States/municipalities have shortsightedly forsaken their duties and ceded them to federal agencies
Yet you and several others want local PD "SWAT" teams to do the job of Federal agencies? Local and state LE doesn't enforce Federal law.
Also correct. That's why recreational pot is legal to poses and use in Colorado in private residences, but NOT on FS, BLM, or Park Service land. It's still a federal crime. I'm not saying that inconsistency in legality isn't a problem, but if anyone thinks the Feds will give up law enforcement jurisdiction on property that they are expected to administer, or vise versa with state or local law enforcement giving up jurisdiction to the Feds without enacted laws to force that that type of system on any entity involved, think again. The administrating agency despite the level it exists at will always retain law enforcement rights.

So again, we return again to the same point. VOTE, and write letters proposing changes to our laws.
 
"No, its because police officers want to go home to their family at the end of their shift. America in 2014 isn't Mayberry, NC in 1965."

Absolutley correct except For the 138 police that were killed in 1965 is a higher number than the 100 killed in 2013.

I'm sure there were less police back then too.

We have the DEA on drug detail. I cite the DEA because many of the posts pointed towards drugs as the reason to need the fire power to do the raids.

Edited to add: to all those confident in the system and say "VOTE" I'll fix that for you..."LOBBY". It's pay to play here.
 
So again, we return again to the same point. VOTE, and write letters proposing changes to our laws.

Been there, done that, continue to do so. So what are you saying? "But don't talk about it."? I don't think that is exactly what is meant by "secret ballot."
 
And they don't have one. They have a trained group of LEO's who put their lives on the line to stop dangerous criminals, just like any other cop. Here is the most recent and tragic loss the good guys had to endure.

http://www.odmp.org/officer/22038-officer-jason-crisp

If any of you would like to explain to this man's family and friends that he and his fellow officers being armed with submachine guns wouldn't have helped or made any difference, I'm sure they would agree with you......:scrutiny:

So would you say that a SWAT team in Chicago trying to bust a drug house run by gang bangers do or don't have the right to use sub guns? How could you make a logical argument that that type of drug bust is any different than busting armed meth cookers in a camper trailer out in the woods? Yes it happens. How is it any different than a bust on a grow plot run by armed individuals in the woods? It isn't. The only difference is the setting and the terrain requires agents that are trained to work in that environment and know how to use it to their advantage and get around in it. If you aren't on board with the use of those weapons by any LEO's then I can't argue as we simply disagree on what equipment is appropriate for LE in general.

Agreed. And again, they don't.

By the way, the man's name was Gifford Pinchot, not Pinchon.

With the greatest of respect to the family of the gentlemen referenced in the first para above, this supports my premise. The Dept of Agriculture has no business enforcing laws against dangerous criminals. It exists to regulate and assist agriculture. Nobody from the USDA should ever be put in a position where they have to confront dangerous criminals. There are specific local, state and federal law enforcement agencies that should do that. And I believe you will find that the Post Office, Social Security Administration and the Dept of Education do indeed have their own SWAT teams. My point is not that we should shackle LEO's with insufficient equipment. It is that every government agency does not need nor should it have its own law enforcement unit. There are well documented cases of Dept of Education SWAT teams doing forced entry on citizens with student loan defaults. That is wrong. And if the DoE was required to use real LEOs to do their enforcement, it would never happen. And no matter how you argue it, a Dept of Education SWAT team is NOT a real LEO. It is the armed praetorian guard of a Cabinet Secretary.

I do not oppose law enforcement. I oppose possession of heavily armed law enforcement units by each and every entity of government. I do not oppose arming Postal Inspectors. It is however neither necessary nor healthy for the Republic that the Tennessee Valley Authority has a SWAT team.
 
Don't know. My local PD (like most PDs) use 6 shot revolvers with .38 spl.

Just kidding, the locals have glocks, tasers, OC and a back up weapon on them. AR-15s ride shotgun, and the shotgun rides trunk.
 
JRH6856 Quote:
=dogtown tom
Machineguns have been removed from civilian usage (the local PD doesn't pay $25K for their MP5)
Wrong, flat wrong. Machine guns are 100% legal for anyone who has a tax stamp. The price a PD pays for their machine guns is irrelevant.

Oh good. I want to buy a H&K UMP in 9x19 and a KRISS Vector in .45ACP. Are you sure all I need is a tax stamp for each? How do I get one?
Failure to read.:rolleyes:
barnbwt wrote "Machineguns have been removed from civilian usage"........which is so wrong it's laughable.
If you want to buy a machine gun use Google or ask any of the dozens of THR members who have them.

If you want a UMP or Kriss, you'll need to get your FFL/SOT......but believe it or not you remain a civilian.

Once you figure out that its completely legal for a "civilian" to possess a machine gun I'll be happy to do your transfer.





Or maybe we just don't think we need so many federal laws that then require federal enforcement. Seems like these resources that have to be managed are located within states. Let the states manage them.
Then "we" needs to stop "thinking" and get off your butt to change those laws. .....after all it's YOUR elected representatives that passed those laws.
Funny how that whole "democracy" thing works isn't it?
 
"They do, as "civilians" can and do own the same firearms as used by LE. Where have you been the last two hundred plus years?"
I, and probably most of the NFA board would take umbrage at a statement cast that carelessly. When it costs me 1,000% more (1500$ vs. 15000$) than the authorities --whose salaries/equipment I'm also paying for

No. We civilians cannot "own the same firearms as used by LE" since LE can use guns newer than '86 and for a hell of a lot less money.

"The price a PD pays for their machine guns is irrelevant."
I'm paying for it, so it's hardly irrelevant. That I don't pay the same price for it myself is hardly-er irrelevant (er)

"-States/municipalities have shortsightedly forsaken their duties and ceded them to federal agencies"
"Yet you and several others want local PD "SWAT" teams to do the job of Federal agencies? Local and state LE doesn't enforce Federal law."
If the DEA is required to maintain law and order in a PD's neck of the woods (as is asserted by the proposed threat of these grows and meth labs being raided by federal authorities) then what is the local SWAT for? What is the local police force for? It'd make more sense to put the DEA resources and mandates into local's hands, because then the local PDs would at least be accountable to the populace they serve as opposed to a thrice-removed bureaucratic oversight committee.

"Our country still has a checks and balances system. While you may disagree, we are a nation of laws.......and if you dislike a law no one is stopping you from attempting to get it reversed. And "powerful, violent opposition"?.......that would be a criminal act. Again if you don't like the law, change it.....there is a way you know."
My point was that you tend to get hurt doing stuff you shouldn't be. There are more officers killed in raids every year, since these once-rare tactics have become ubiquitous. The premises that used to justify their use have not.

"I'm not a cop, never been a cop, never will be a cop......but if my local police officers need AR's (and they do), MRAPS, drones, SWAT ninjas, or sharks with lasers to do their job and be able to go home to their family at night.....God bless them. It's an often repeated statement: "don't bring a knife to a gun fight".........well you don't have to be a cop to know "don't bring only a handgun when the other guy has a rifle" is sensible."
And what will you say when the police chief, with the mayor behind him, says your disarmament is the only way to keep his officers safe? It happens every time. I also think you need to rethink your stance on throwing money at problems, which is all equipment purchases are, since resources are very rarely the problem in a country as awash in riches as ours. I support our officers, but not endlessly, nor blindly, and I believe they can be run better as is the case with every other government entity.

"No, its because police officers want to go home to their family at the end of their shift. America in 2014 isn't Mayberry, NC in 1965."
And 1934 wasn't 1900, because it was utterly awash in machine-gun attacks by bootleggers. Except that that was an utter lie promulgated to get support for the National Firearms Act aimed squarely at limiting the kinds of weapons Bonus Army type uprisings could accumulate. And more importantly, keeping them out of the hands of poor people/minorities in cities ;)

"Constables (in Texas) rarely serve high risk fugitive warrants.....you should know that if you live here......they serve CIVIL PAPERS."
That's why I used the term "constable" ;)
-"Put it this way: Dallas (or was it Ft. Worth? Probably both by this point) acquired an MRAP for the stated purpose of serving subpoenas & warrants. Like I said; constable stuff."

"This thread isn't about firearms, it's just another tin foil hat infused rant against our own government."
I'd wager the local PDs wear more metal on their head than me. Or Kevlar, as the case may be ;). The thread was about firearms purchases, though I did try to get some clarity on what types of gun they might actually source for this (becuz it might be cool :D). Seeing as it is about policy, it makes sense for some political tones to enter the conversation, provided we keep the focus on their impact on the RKBA.

On that note, I have one more bullet item;
-The same impulse of PDs to lobby for increased operational effectiveness is the exact same impulse used to justify disarmament of the populace, if left unchecked

Anything to get home safe. Anything. Anything. Even if it gets me and my dog shot when they raid the wrong address and fail to identify :rolleyes:

TCB
 
Which of the two political parties that control the political process has any serious intention to reduce police militarization or liberalize the laws surrounding civilian acquisition and ownership of machine guns?
 
Suspicious activity results in invetigation,
Investigation produces evidence,
Evidence produces charges,
Charges produce arrest warrants,
Warrants result in arrests.

It is necessary for the investigator to know the specifics of the law as it applies to the suspicious activity. But once charges are filed and a warrant has been issued, specialized knowledge of the law regarding the offence is not needed to serve the warrant. Any LEO has sufficient knowledge to execute the warrant.
 
"If you want to buy a machine gun use Google or ask any of the dozens of THR members who have them.

If you want a UMP or Kriss, you'll need to get your FFL/SOT......but believe it or not you remain a civilian.

Once you figure out that its completely legal for a "civilian" to possess a machine gun I'll be happy to do your transfer."

While we're dancing with angels on pin-heads, I was under the impression the business retains ownership of the deal post-sample created under the SOT. I know corporations are persons, but probably not 'civilians' in the way we think of the word. I still can't get over the logic of thinking it's acceptable to require a person to;
-file a business in their city
-apply for an FFL with SOT (thousands of dollars and months/years of wait, IIRC)
-navigate a never-ending minefield of FFL pitfalls
-undergo ATF inspections
-run said business, since an FFL/SOT cannot be used for personal purposes alone (or at all, technically)
-AND THEN pay God only knows how much for the gun they wanted in the first place; probably chump change for a UMP considering all the other expenses.

And all this just to use the same gun as the local PD :scrutiny:. Probably easier to go around the system and just bribe everybody :rolleyes: (Senator Yee, anyone? ;))

Ironically, the ATF recently screwed up and declared trusts are no longer persons so their members would need background checks before transferring NFA items (completely at odds with plain law, but "what the hey? Anything to get home safe, right?"), so technically it would seem trusts can now file Form 1's to get new MG's added to the registry. Oops.

"Which of the two political parties that control the political process has any serious intention to reduce police militarization or liberalize the laws surrounding civilian acquisition and ownership of machine guns?"
Probably a 20-30% share of both parties do. The remainder have a vested interest in keeping them at odds with one another.

TCB

*btw, dogtown, I just may hit you up for a transfer in the future; you've got one of the saner prices I've seen around town. Just need to find a good excuse to swing by NE Dallas next time I bring a gun in :D
 
dogtown tom said:
If you want a UMP or Kriss, you'll need to get your FFL/SOT......but believe it or not you remain a civilian.

Once you figure out that its completely legal for a "civilian" to possess a machine gun I'll be happy to do your transfer.

Not just "a machine gun, those two guns specifically. UMP production began in 1999, KRISS Vector in 2006. NFA Registry closed in 1987. So I am asking you, as an FFL holder with the necessary knowledge: how do I as a private individual get them registered? (OK, barnbwt covered the ridiculous idea of FFL/SOT so let's not go there.)
Then "we" needs to stop "thinking" and get off your butt to change those laws. .....after all it's YOUR elected representatives that passed those laws.
Funny how that whole "democracy" thing works isn't it?

Yeah, the funny thing about the way it works is it takes more than one vote. And the way you get more votes is get more interest. And one way to get more interest is to talk about what needs to change. Oh! that's what we're trying to do. :eek:
 
Another related question would be; can a civilian import legally armor-piercing ammunition through any means at this point? I'm thinking of the H&K MP7 with it's hardened steel bullets, here. Is there any way a non-LEO could get its ammunition?

TCB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top