The VPC has stolen a picture of Oleg

[gun-fucious]

check out the new flash movie on their new site:
http://www.banassaultweapons.org/flashmovie.cfm/

the goof balls have it as a downloadable file here:
http://flash.ctsg.com/vpc/viralflash/vpcflash.swf

lookie lookie:

 

[Greg L]

Turn the rabid assault lawyers loose. Anyone have a "cease and desist" on file .

 

[Kaylee]

Cease and desist nothing.. I'd say Oleg is entitled to royalties from his work. Say, $50 per image, per download?

-K

 

[Quartus]

sic 'em.

 

[TarpleyG]

Funny thing, really. I can get to this trash site from my work computer but I cannot get to sites like glocktalk, etc. I sent a message to my boss asking why allowing this brainwashing garbage was okay but other stuff that wasn't necessarily PC is off limits.

GT

 

[StLGlocker]

I think I might download the movie. Several dozen times, in fact. Bandwidth is expensive.

Edit: What's with all the flashes of T&A? I expected the usual nonsense...

Their contention that terrorists come here to get weapons is just about the stupidest thing I ever did read. Why would Osama & Co. come here and get neutered semi-auto AR's and AK's when they have piles and piles of the real thing at home, and a lot cheaper to boot?

 

[gun-fucious]

found another!!!

 

[atek3]

that movie accurately portrays the horrors of a society in which the lumpenmensch can possess sturmgewehr because after all:


(shamelessly borrowed without permission from Oleg's page )

atek3

 

[OF]

Gather evidence! Kill!!!!!

- Gabe

 

[El Tejon]

Gee, it would be such a shame if an IP attorney were advised of this!

What's the beef, chief? Mr. Wolf and the other young lady [edited thanks to Kaylee--I thought it was Tam, sorry] are using Brady-approved weapons, no?

What could they have against one complying with the VCCA of '94 (their law)?

 

[Kaylee]

um...pssst.... that ain't Tam.. different cute blonde gunny chick

 

[Henry Bowman]

Oleg,

PM me if you have any desire to discuss a letter to them. IP law is what I do. Sounds like Pro Bono (for the good) to me.

 

[AJ Dual]

um...pssst.... that ain't Tam.. different cute blonde gunny chick

Yep, but she is definitely one of Oleg's models, I recognize her from other pics and posters.

 

[ballistic gelatin]

I just want to know where I can buy an AK for $169.
Bunch of losers!

 

[gun-fucious]

different cute blonde gunny chick

oops!
yer right, i'm always getting my cute blonde gunny chicks confused!



Mike Dillon is being informed of the shanghai of his images right now

 

[Brian Dale]

Oleg's statement, at http://www.a-human-right.com/RKBA/faq.html :

Organizations or individuals promoting restrictions on ownership and use of firearms are prohibited from using any images from this site.

OK, we have willful and malicious theft of copyrighted photographs as part of a campaign against the Bill of Rights and against the owners of the photographs (It sounds like they've stolen Mike Dillon's stuff, too).

VPC's goal, in their own words, is at http://www.banassaultweapons.org/why_it_matters/

The Solution: To accomplish the goal of ridding our streets of assault weapons, the new law must ban all--not just some--semiautomatic assault rifles, pistols, and shotguns._

They can't make it any plainer than that.

 

[Bartholomew Roberts]

Just went through it frame by frame - they use the picture of Oleg twice and then the picture of Oleg's blond model once (followed by the second picture of Oleg).

Wonder who the soldier is that they decided to equate with bin-Laden? I hope VPC markets the rest of its anti-gun message with similar hyperbole as it makes our job a lot easier.

I don't know who designed it; but the retard used the same gun pictures repeatedly but so briefly they don't even register. Whoever it is also has a hardon for TEC-9s and their descendants.

 

[Henry Bowman]

How do I download a copy of the flash movie for evidence? I seem to only be able to play it.

 

[femoralis]

I assume the $169 aks would be the saiga or some variety of single-stack.

 

[ballistic gelatin]

I hope none of the organiztions listed receive funds from the government.
Isn't it considered a conflict of interest for a government funded organization to push some "political agenda"? That's like the government itself pushing the vote one way or another.

How do we stop them?

 

[Intune]

Thanks Henry, from gun owners everywhere!

 

[bogie]

Seek some serious lawsuit $$$, and either make a charitable donation to a _real_ firearms safety organization, buy more toys, buy better cameras, or pay for bandwidth.

At the very least, if we can get someone to do our legal stuff, it'll cost them $$ for their lawyers...

 

[gun-fucious]

if you go into macromedia's stand alone
"flash player" application there is
a menu item for opening a location

paste in:
http://flash.ctsg.com/vpc/viralflash/vpcflash.swf


from the file menu then use the "create projector"
command to make an archive copy

its a 1.9 meg file

if you play the movie you can pause it
via the control menu to step forward and back

when you open the window size you can see
image area outside the normal presentation window

the dillons blue press cover is all there

 

[buzz_knox]

I didn't watch the movie, but if they depict our fellow gun nuts in a manner that indicates that they are involved in the commission of a crime or is otherwise detrimental to them, then there's a nice defamation suit in there as well.

 

[chaim]

My favorite picture there, one I have no idea how someone can see as negative, is the picture of the uniformed soldier with a rifle along with a young boy (presumably his son) with a .22 rifle. It is actually kind of a nice picture. Then to seconds later juxtipose it with the Columbine shootings is just reprehensible.

Anyway, back to the topic at hand...sue them, sue them, sue them. Isn't the VPC the renamed organization that was sued for the same sort of thing just a year or so ago and then just declared bankrupcy and reorganized under the new name?