This guy is brilliant, insane or both

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
http://www.concealcarry.org/naacp.htm

GUN STORES: PLEASE COOPERATE WITH THE NAACP BY REFUSING TO SELL GUNS TO AFRICAN-AMERICANS
Concealed Carry, Inc. Announces Policy Of Refusing Gun Sales To Blacks
By John Birch, President, Concealed Carry, Inc., PO BOX 4597, Oak Brook, IL 60522-4597, Tel: 630 660-3935 Fax: 815 327-1152 Email: [email protected] Web: www.concealcarry.org

INTRODUCTION: Concealed Carry, Inc. is deeply concerned with advancing social policy in terms of the public safety. We demonstrated that by encouraging those attending the Taste of Chicago in 2001 to carry unloaded guns in fanny packs. As a result, arguably the safest place to be in Chicago on July 4th, 2001 was Grant Park. Just the perception that many were armed was enough to give the police little to nothing to do. In 2002 we had a program (now discontinued) to give one hand gun a month free to a Chicago resident. Several Chicagoans are now safe. In 2003 we feel it critical to continue our efforts to save lives and to do so in a way that creates community partnerships. I will explain further.

THE PROBLEM: One of the great scourges of gun violence is the "black on black" shootings taking place in our inner cities. To address this tragedy The Baltimore-based National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has sued gun manufacturers. The NAACP is arguing that handgun violence disproportionately harms poor, urban blacks, and that gun companies have failed to take steps to lessen the harm.

Maybe the association has a point. After all, sending in the police to confiscate guns in minority neighborhoods is both dangerous and draconian. But is using the courts to force a solution the best way to effect positive social change? Why not seek a voluntary solution to the supply of guns that is killing African-American youth?

For instance, John Riggio who owns Chuck's Guns in Riverdale, will tell you that blacks want his store closed. So much so that the Pastor of Salem Baptist Church (http://www.sbcoc.org/index2.asp), the Reverend and Senator James T. Meeks (http://www.legis.state.il.us/Senate/Senator.asp?MemberID=861) conducts marches with his congregation on his store seeking that John voluntarily cease operations. Reverend Meeks also seeks the closure of all liquor stores in Roseland (http://www.sbcoc.org/project2003.asp). His message is clear and his message is consistent: Get liquor and guns out of our community and African-Americans will live in safety.

These marchers are sincere and their communities bear the brunt of the carnage. Frankly my own observations confirm that it's more dangerous to be in a black neighborhood than in a predominantly white area. I also know that when people are left to reason for themselves they mostly know what is best. Therefore if the NAACP and the Salem Baptist Church collectively see a problem it would not be wise to dispute them. I have no idea what's it like to live in a black neighborhood, but I bet they do, and it's time I listened more and took action based on the their needs rather than my perceptions.

I have always advocated the way to reduce "black on black" gun violence was to arm the law abiding blacks by overturning Mayor Daley's gun ban and creating public awareness for the safety of the community provided by good citizens with guns. I am willing to admit now that I may have been wrong.

THE SOLUTION: Therefore, as of March 18th, 2003, Concealed Carry, Inc. will no longer make gun sales to African-Americans. Not handguns, not rifles and not even shotguns. We had one close call already with the Takita Miles case (http://www.concealcarry.org/zorn15feb1003.htm) and there is no reason to take further chances. We will defer in this matter to Senator Meeks as he not only represents a socially progressive congregation, but is also elected to the high office of state senator. Until the Reverend Meeks requests we resume sales to African-Americans, I am going to use the broad authority granted me as a federally licensed gun dealer to prevent straw purchases by denying sales to African-Americans. To insure fairness, there will be no exceptions.

I am aware there may be similar problems in other neighborhoods. Therefore if an ethnically representative organization like Dr. Juan Andrade's "United States Hispanic Leadership Institute" (http://www.ushli.com/) requests we cease gun sales to Hispanics, we will take that under serious advisement. In fact we will listen to the leadership of any ethnic community and base our sales policy on problems they can demonstrate to us with fact.

But we are but one small gun dealer. The fact is it will take a concerted a effort by all Illinois gun dealers. If gun dealers don't want to be regulated out of existence by the state of Illinois, then we better show we are committed to keeping guns out of the hands of criminals. The first step is to cooperate with the black leadership. I ask that all Illinois gun dealers immediately cease gun sales to any African-American. Just this step alone will cut straw sales to a trickle. Police arrests and gun confiscations will then take care of the existing gun supply over just a few years time. The number of guns in our African-American communities will then be negligible and gun violence will be as common as it is now in Oak Brook, IL.

If Illinois gun dealers won't cease sales to African-Americans then they probably deserve the licensing and oppressive gun regulation they are going to get. As for Concealed Carry, Inc. our mission is to save lives. Until Senator Meeks or the NAACP says otherwise we will do our part to see that no illegal guns end up in African-American neighborhoods. Let me hear from my fellow gun dealers. Will you join me in saving lives with this voluntary program? email me at: [email protected] and I will publish your store's name here to thank you.
 
I vote for brilliant and insane.

Oh, and I'm moving this to L&P. Hang on ...

pax

No sane person could live in this world and not be crazy. -- Ursula K. LeGuin
 
oh that's John Birch and the concealed carry folks east of the big muddy - they live in a state where the mayor of chicago seems to own at least a third of the legislature and nobody cares about common people at all. you can't blame them for going off into sarcasm and fantasy land every once in a while...
 
It's about as insane as the affirmative action bake sale.

He's doing exactly what the NAACP has asked, and hoping for outrage at his action, which can then be pointed back to the NAACP, who requested that blacks not be sold firearms. The underlying premise to all this is that black leaders don't feel black people can be trusted with firearms. Ah, the irony.

What would be even better, if all this goes as it should, that when announces he is no longer following the NAACP's wishes, is that he would have Roy or Niger Innis from CORE at his side to announce the change. Maybe even someone like Walter Williams, too.

There's a fine line between genius and insanity - I hope he can pull this off.
 
Until the Reverend Meeks requests we resume sales to African-Americans, I am going to use the broad authority granted me as a federally licensed gun dealer to prevent straw purchases by denying sales to African-Americans. To insure fairness, there will be no exceptions.
Hey, Meeks axed for it.
 
This is political satire of the highest magnitude... and absolutely astoundingly brilliant. Kudos to them!
 
Brilliant!

Brilliant and NOT insane. For those of you that don't get it, read it a few more times and you'll see what he is trying to achieve.
 
Brilliant. John knows what he's doing and he most definitely has an uphill climb. Take a peek at his website to see what he's all about.
 
This guy has a good brain on him. No matter which alley NAACP runs down, he wins. They will be flumoxed!

Michael in Sandy, OR
 
I get it. He is trying to gain allies in the gun world while simultanously pushing a racist agenda.

If he is pro-gun he already has allies in the gun world. The problem is that he will only foster racism among gun owners by giving gun owners a reason to hate a person they don't know because of skin color. Sarcasm or not, this "joke" is at the expense of individuals. These individuals may be pro-gun or anti-gun, but they are individuals that have been lumped together based on a physical atribute.

The author is also giving anti's more ammunition to use against us. Now all gun owners are racisist and anti's can use his sarcastic logic to prove it. This sort of stuff can be used to support Michael Moore's theory that the KKK just changed it's name to the NRA.

Count me out. This racist rhetoric stinks. It is not noble to climb uphill if the hill is made up of the bodies of the people you have pushed down.

This thread scares me.
 
"The author is also giving anti's more ammunition to use against us. Now all gun owners are racisist and anti's can use his sarcastic logic to prove it. This sort of stuff can be used to support Michael Moore's theory that the KKK just changed it's name to the NRA."

That's already the case. This won't do any more damage.

You're taking it way too literally. This guy didn't bring race into the debate, he's just making fun of the argument.
 
Geech,

I submit that not only did this guy bring race into the debate, but his debate is based ONLY on race. No other demographic is mentioned; not income, not sex, not height, not age, not occupation, not education, not family situation, not ... JUST RACE.

In response to your comment that this will not do any more damage, I must respectfully disagree. I believe (addmitedly no facts or data to back it up) that anti-gun sentiments and racism are grown or are diffused in small incriments. I was not born a "gun nut" and did not wake up one morning and become one. I suspect that racism is the same way. This guy is making fun of people because of their skin color and people on this board are okay with it, even supporting it because they can back the author's other "cause". That is a smal incriment down racism boulevard.

"A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." Loa Tsi
 
I submit that not only did this guy bring race into the debate, but his debate is based ONLY on race. No other demographic is mentioned; not income, not sex, not height, not age, not occupation, not education, not family situation, not ... JUST RACE.

Kinda like the grounds for the NAACP's cause of action?
 
CZ-75,

Exactly like the grounds for the NAACP's cause of action. This makes my point. Look how somebody else (the NAACP) using race as the sole basis for an argument seems so silly.

Seargent Bob,

I used to have an uncle that lived in Alaska. :uhoh:
 
While you may have a point that using race in this situation brings him closer to racism, he did not bring race into the matter. Look at the plaintiff: it's the NAACP. They're suing on the grounds that guns are especially harmful to black communities. Mfume even went so far as to say that members of the black community weren't "responsible" enough for firearms ownership.

It seems to me that race had an element in this case from the very beginning.
 
Exactly like the grounds for the NAACP's cause of action. This makes my point. Look how somebody else (the NAACP) using race as the sole basis for an argument seems so silly.

So it isn't apparent to you that flipping the point and taking the opposite tack is reductio ad absurdem?
 
Geech,
There is not a plantiff in the article. The author chose to be in-your-face and play off race to make a sarcastic point. He uses the court NAACP case to exemplify the point, but HE wrote the article and brought race into it. He did not have to do so. He is not a victim of the article.

CZ-75,
I do understand that the author is trying prove the truth of his premis by proving the alternative false. He is very clever in doing so.

I am wondering if you understand my points. Can you see how this can reflect poorly on the pro-gun cause? Can you see how this has no regard for individuals as it groups people based on race? Can you see how this is racism?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top