Thompson Expected to Announce White House Candidacy in July

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
3,539
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,276387,00.html

WASHINGTON — It seems all but certain that former senator and "Law & Order" TV star Fred Thompson will formally announce his campaign for president sometime after July 4.

Sources tell FOX News that the former Tennessee senator will wait until after Independence Day to announce in hopes of finding a more interested public, and the announcement could come as soon as July 5. Although plans have not yet been solidified.

And The Politico reported Wednesday that Thompson told a group of financial backers on Tuesday that he is going to run and had already raised millions of dollars. Thompson is encouraging more support as he readies his campaign in the crowded field of Republican candidates.

• Click here to read the report in The Politico.

The Politico also reports that a number of staffers to former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush are expected to join Thompson's campaign.

Polls show that Republicans have not been satisfied with the current field of candidates. And even as an unofficial candidate, Thompson has pulled closely with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who is neck-and-neck with Arizona Sen. John McCain. For now, they are trailing former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Thompson is posturing himself as the more conservative alternative to would-be opponents Giuliani and McCain, and more steadfast than Romney, who is facing criticism for recently switching views on some conservative issues.

Thompson also is expected in early June to form a "testing the waters" committee, which is one type of precursor organization to an official campaign. While foregoing an exploratory committee, the filing still would allow Thompson to raise money in June in order to launch his candidacy in July.

Thompson does not expect to have the millions needed to compete aggressively in the Ames, Iowa, straw poll in August, but does hope to raise enough in June — including more than $1 million from a one-day telemarketing kick-off. Romney held a similar fundraiser in January pulling in $6 million.
 
The information on how Fred Thompson stands with respect to the other Republicans is, IMO, bogus. From everything I've seen, he's been either neck and neck with the top runner from either party, or he's greatly surpassed them all.
 
http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070530/NEWS0206/70530009

Wednesday, 05/30/07
Thompson says he plans to run, wants to be 2008's outsider

By Susan Page
USA TODAY

STAMFORD, Conn. — Politician-turned-actor Fred Thompson plans an unconventional campaign for president using blogs, video posts and other Internet innovations to reach voters repelled by politics-as-usual in both parties, he told USA Today.

Thompson, a former U.S. Senator from Tennessee, has been coy about his intentions with audiences, but made clear in an interview that he plans to run.


"I can't remember exactly the point that I said, 'I'm going to do this,' " Thompson says, his 6-foot, 6-inch frame sprawled comfortably across a couch in a hotel suite. "But when I did, the thing that occurred to me: 'I'm going to tell people that I am thinking about it and see what kind of reaction I get to it.' "

His late start carries some problems but also "certain advantages," he says. "Nobody has maxed out to me" in contributions, he notes, and using the Internet already "has allowed me to be in the hunt, so to speak, without spending a dime."

Thompson could reshape a GOP contest in which each of the three leaders has significant vulnerabilities and none of the seven second-tier contenders has broken through. Without formally joining the race — he's preparing to do that as early as the first week of July — Thompson already is placing third and better among Republican candidates in some national polls.

Dissatisfaction among one-third of Republicans with the 2008 field has opened the door for the candidate whose folksy tone, actor's ease before an audience and conservative credentials drew comparisons to Ronald Reagan at the annual Connecticut GOP dinner here. Thompson addressed the dinner last week to a sold-out audience.

"People listen to him and see someone who's very comfortable with who he is and confident about what he believes in," state Republican chairman Chris Healy says. "That's a skill that, obviously, Ronald Reagan took to great heights."

Thompson, who's left a five-season stint playing Manhattan District Attorney Arthur Branch on NBC's Law & Order, says his model will be the untraditional campaign he ran for the Senate in 1994.

After a lackluster start, Thompson swapped his suit for a plaid shirt and began driving a pickup across the state in a bid to fill the final two years of Al Gore's term. Despite his background as a Washington lawyer and lobbyist, Thompson derided Congress as larded with legislators who had lost touch with their constituents and principles.

He swamped his Democratic opponent by 21 percentage points in a year Republicans capitalized on anti-pathy to President Clinton to win control of the House and Senate.

"I feel some of the same feelings that I felt in the latter part of that '94 campaign about what is going on in the country today -- only greater," says Thompson, citing public cynicism toward the Republican president and the new Democrat-controlled Congress. "You can't drive the truck all the way across the country, but since '94 other opportunities have opened up in terms of ways to communicate."

A candidate could use the Internet "to cut through the clutter and go right to the people," he says.

And the truck, now parked at his mother's home in Franklin, Tenn.? "You might drive it a few places."

It's rare: The Republican presidential nomination is as up-for-grabs as the Democratic one.

Even in Connecticut — the backyard of former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and a state whose primary Arizona Sen. John McCain carried in 2000 — many Republican activists are still trying to decide whom to support.

"We're looking for someone who can be dynamic, who can bring together the troops," Stephen Bessette, 44, a Stonington selectman, says as he waits for Thompson to speak. "There are still people with their hands in their pockets, waiting for the right candidate."

'A disconnect out there'

None of the current contenders seems to have the stuff to win an "uphill battle" in the general election, says John Nazzaro, 49, a member of the GOP state central committee. He wonders if Thompson's persona might fare better.

Despite what seems to have been a charmed life as politician and actor, Thompson can project an outsider's demeanor — as much the working-class kid from Lawrenceburg, Tenn., as the celebrity who now lives in the tony Washington suburb of McLean, Va. He has a Southern drawl, a loping gait, a lined face and a balding pate.

Although he's never spotlighted the social issues that energize much of the Republican base, Thompson consistently voted against abortion and in favor of gun rights in the Senate. Giuliani's support of abortion rights and Romney's conversion to oppose them have raised qualms among some social conservatives toward them.

On Iraq, Thompson voted to authorize the invasion in 2002 and now opposes setting a timetable to withdraw U.S. troops. Still, his fortunes aren't as inextricably tied to the war as those of McCain, one of the war's leading defenders.

In any case, Thompson argues that Republicans lost control of the House and Senate in November not because of the war but because of out-of-control spending and unrestrained partisanship. What's surprising is that Democrats didn't gain more ground, he says.

"It's been kind of a pox on both your houses," he says. "There's a disconnect out there between the people and Washington. -- It seems lately whoever has power, whoever has control makes the same predictable mistakes." His campaign themes: tighter borders, smaller government, lower taxes.

He says he knows a primary campaign won't be easy. Most of the top GOP strategists have signed up with other campaigns. The current contenders have a head-start on fundraising.

And some skeptics question whether Thompson has the drive for a national campaign. "He didn't have a particularly distinguished Senate career, though that has never been a bar to anybody else being president," says David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union. "The book on him is he's lazy. I don't know whether that's true or not."

Thompson bristles at the suggestion he's lazy or running on a lark — dismissing them as "shots by concerned future competitors." He acknowledges a campaign involves "working your fanny off" and predicts his late start means he'll need less money than the others. He made his first appeal to 100 fundraisers in a conference call Tuesday.

He hopes to make a splash by amassing an impressive fundraising total on Monday, when he forms a testing-the-waters committee. The formal campaign is to be launched around the Fourth of July.

Volunteer State volunteers

The Tennessee Republican running for president in 2008 was supposed to be senator Bill Frist.

Then Frist announced in November he was retiring from politics. That weekend, Tennessee Rep. Zach Wamp met with former senator Howard Baker as part of an effort to persuade Toyota to locate an assembly plant in Chattanooga.

That campaign failed — Toyota announced in February the plant would go to Tupelo, Miss. — but a presidential draft was launched.

Wamp asked Baker, Thompson's mentor, to call Thompson and urge him to jump in the presidential race. "You've known him a long time," Baker replied, according to Wamp. "Call him yourself."

Thompson had been re-elected to the Senate in 1996 and briefly considered a presidential bid before the 2000 race. In 2002, however, devastated when his 38-year-old daughter, Elizabeth Panici, died of an accidental prescription-drug overdose, he decided not to run for another Senate term.

He signed on for the Law & Order role — he has been a character actor since playing himself as a whistelin a 1987 movie about a Tennessee political scandal — and went on the speaking circuit. He began blogging and regularly appearing on ABC Radio, sometimes filling in for idiosyncratic commentator Paul Harvey. Divorced for nearly 20 years, he married Jeri Kehn, a Washington lawyer, in 2002. They have a 4-year-old daughter and a 6-month-old son.

When Wamp first called, Thompson demurred. When none of the GOP candidates seemed to catch fire, he reconsidered. In February, Thompson told Wamp he was "very open-minded."

In March, Thompson announced on Fox News Sunday that he was "going to leave the door open" to a bid. Two weeks later, he finished in third place among Republicans in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll, beating Romney out of the box and trailing only Giuliani and McCain.

In April, he disclosed that he had been diagnosed in 2004 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, though he says the slow-growing cancer hasn't caused him any problems and his doctors tell him he may well live a normal lifespan.

A video offensive

Last week, he won an unofficial straw poll of GOP activists in Georgia, besting by 2-1 the No. 2 finisher — former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who's from Georgia and isn't formally in the race yet, either.

His biggest challenge, Thompson says, will be to avoid getting cautious — that is, to forget the lessons he learned in his 1994 plaid-shirt-and-red-truck campaign.

Consider how he responded two weeks ago when liberal filmmaker Michael Moore challenged him to a debate on health care and called him a hypocrite for favoring embargoed Havana cigars. Thompson had chided Moore's new documentary, Sicko, which unfavorably compares the U.S. health care system with the one in Cuba.

" 'Jeri said, 'You know, we could have some fun,' " Thompson recalls. " 'Why don't you do something on the Internet?' So I got to thinking about it."

"And Mark Corallo and Ed McFadden had that camera there in 40 minutes," Jeri, who is sitting in on the interview, breaks in. Corallo and McFadden, aides to John Ashcroft when he was U.S. attorney general, have been helping Thompson behind the scenes.

In the video, sitting in at the desk in his study, Thompson seems to be studying his calendar, an unlit Montecristo in his mouth.

"You know, I've been looking at my schedule, Michael, and I don't think I have time for you," Thompson begins. "But I may be the least of your problems. You know, the next time you're down in Cuba visiting your buddy Castro, you might ask him about another documentary filmmaker. His name is Nicolas Guillen. He did something Castro didn't like, and they put him in a mental institution for several years, giving him devastating electroshock treatment.

"A mental institution, Michael," he says. "Might be something you ought to think about."

By 11:30 a.m., two hours after his first chat about the furor, the 38-second video was done. Soon it was posted on Breitbart.tv.

The challenge of his campaign will be to keep taking risks, Thompson says. "I've got to fight to have the guts enough to follow my own instincts," he says. "You're going to have good days and bad. You might as well do it your way."

This sounds more definite.
 
Another confirmation....

Source:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=13707&R=113821739E

Testing the Waters
Fred Thompson is running.
by Stephen F. Hayes
05/29/2007 10:21:00 PM


FRED THOMPSON IS RUNNING for the Republican presidential nomination. In a conference call Monday, Thompson addressed a group of more than 100 supporters and fundraisers whom the campaign has dubbed First Day Founders. He told them that he would be setting up an organization that will allow him to begin raising money and recruiting staff.

In official campaign finance parlance, the move represents a shift from "giving serious consideration" to a presidential bid, as Thompson said he would do back in March, as a non-candidate, to a "testing the waters" period where one is, in effect, a candidate-in-waiting with a campaign-in-preparation. Thompson advisers point out that the new testing-the-waters entity is not quite a campaign committee, though it will officially begin accepting contributions on June 4. On that day--the First Day, as it were--the campaign will take in donations that it can then tout as an impressive one-day haul. A corollary benefit will be that news reports about Thompson's non-entry entry will run on June 5, when the declared candidates will meet in New Hampshire for their third debate. (Thompson won't be required to disclose his donors and the amounts they give to the Federal Election Commission until September.)

No one thinks Thompson would have set up this entity if he had not decided to run, and there were apparently no serious qualifications or hesitations expressed on the conference call yesterday. The testing-the-waters committee allows Thompson to recruit and hire staff, which he intends to do. And he now has an entity that can collect campaign cash. For nearly four months, would-be Thompson supporters have been frozen in place, unable to contribute to Thompson even as they have been hounded by other campaigns.

Former Georgia Senator Mack Mattingly, a First Day Founder who was on the conference call, says that he has chosen to back Thompson for two reasons. "First, he's a conservative. Second, he's a leader." Mattingly believes that the creation of the new committee will change the dynamics of the race. "I don't want to say anything bad about the other candidates," he says. "There'll probably be people who were supporting some other candidates who will be joining us. We'll welcome them, too." (Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn last week announced that she was switching her support from Mitt Romney, whom she endorsed in January, to Thompson.)

The conference call began around 2:00 pm. Ken Rietz, a top executive with Burson Marsteller and a close adviser to Thompson, welcomed the participants. Phillip Martin, who organized the phone call, spoke briefly before introducing the former Tennessee senator. Thompson thanked the supporters for their confidence in him and talked about his reasons for taking this next step toward an official run. He later answered several questions about his positions on big issues and campaign strategy. Tom Collamore, a former Reagan and George H.W. Bush administration official described by the Washington Post's Chris Cilizza as Thompson's "campaign manager in waiting," discussed the First Day Founders and their role in this pre-campaign effort. And Michael Toner, a former chairman of the FEC who served as the top lawyer on George W. Bush's 2000 campaign before performing the same job at the Republican National Committee, reviewed the laws and regulations governing the testing-the-waters committee.

The new committee allows Thompson to continue to fulfill long-standing speaking obligations, while ramping up his inevitable presidential effort. His advisers describe it as a "natural progression" on the road to an announcement, which could come as early as late June or early July. One rumor making the rounds last night anticipated an official announcement in his hometown in Tennessee in a month--on July 4th. Independence Day could be Announcement Day.

Stephen F. Hayes is senior writer at THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
 
Its funny because I see him as a greater of 2 evils when it comes to the Democrats and Republicans. If he takes the Republican nomination I will vote Libertarian for sure and campaign against him and his fellow Republicans.
 
...I see him as a greater of 2 evils when it comes to the Democrats and Republican...

You see him as worse than the potential democratic candidate? Yikes!!
 
Its funny because I see him as a greater of 2 evils when it comes to the Democrats and Republicans.

So you'd prefer Hillary as President over Fred :confused::confused::confused:

I respect your opinion, however, if that happens you will eventually regret your choice and wished you have not made it. I like the Libertarian platform (mostly) and I think Ron Paul is a rock solid guy who I respect and agree with lots of the stuff he says including Iraq and our continuing foreign policy disasters. At the same time I do not agree with Fred on globalization and other issues.

Having said all that, I think Fred is good candidate who can possibly beat Clinton and be a good President. Ron Paul does not stand a chance. The country is not ready for him or someone like him at this point in time.
 
I have a question for the Fred fans. As far as I can tell, his only plus is that he is pro 2nd.(he could be just acting)
Has he ever introduced any Pro RKBA legislation?
 
Since when has Mitt Romney been a top-tier Republican candidate? I can understand McCain and Rudy, but Romney? Please.

camacho, I can kind of understand where you are coming from, but seriously you greatly overestimate Hillary's popularity. If the Dems run either her or Obama they are pretty much giving the presidency away to the Repubs.

Frankly I'm sick of conservatives, almost as much as liberals.
 
camacho said:
So you'd prefer Hillary as President over Fred

I respect your opinion, however, if that happens you will eventually regret your choice and wished you have not made it. I like the Libertarian platform (mostly) and I think Ron Paul is a rock solid guy who I respect and agree with lots of the stuff he says including Iraq and our continuing foreign policy disasters. At the same time I do not agree with Fred on globalization and other issues.

Having said all that, I think Fred is good candidate who can possibly beat Clinton and be a good President. Ron Paul does not stand a chance. The country is not ready for him or someone like him at this point in time.

I see Fred as one more of the same. Every candidate, with the exception of Paul, might as well wear the same outfit with the same haircut. Except for very minor differences, they all believe the same thing.

Fred does not have a chance. No republican does who supports the war on terror. He denies that they lost last election on the war issue, and anyone who says that is blind or an idiot.

You say that the country is not ready for Ron Paul. If they aren't now, they never will be.

If anyone but Paul takes the nomination, I will probably vote dem just for spite.
 
The GOP didn't lose the election because of the war. They lost it because they failed to be conservative and do conservative things, like cut spending, make tax cuts permanent or tax reform, repeal gun control, etc...
 
camacho, I can kind of understand where you are coming from, but seriously you greatly overestimate Hillary's popularity. If the Dems run either her or Obama they are pretty much giving the presidency away to the Repubs.

You know, I wish you are right. However, neither of the media proclaimed big 3 at this time stir any passion on the conservative side, let alone the general electorate. If the conservatives do not show to vote for those guys who is going to elect them, the Dems and the Independents. You know that will not happen. Fred on the other side definitely can energize the conservative folks and can easily win good amount of Independents.

However, Hillary vs. McCain/Romney/Guliani is a foregone conclusion as far as I am concerned. As to Rudy G., I am actually not sure who will be worse, him or Hillary. I have some serious suspicions that he might be the worse of the two precisely of his cowboy views on foreign policy. We do not need another George W. in the White House.

Going back to Fred, he is not shoe in either, and has an uphill battle in front of him. It is quite possible that by the time W. is out of office, no one with R at the front will be electable. Iraq plus few more Gonzales type gaffes can really screw up the Rep. candidates. Sadly, this administration is the "Midas" of political mishaps. Anything they touch becomes a problem.

Having said all that, Fred is the only little hope there is.
 
his only plus is he is pro 2Amend

And

I see Fred as one more of the same. Every candidate, with the exception of Paul, might as well wear the same outfit with the same haircut. Except for very minor differences, they all believe the same thing.

Both statements are rediculous. If you can't see the basic underlying differences between what FT is offering, and what the other Repubs are offering, you're covering your eyes and ears and chanting to yourself. What other electable Republican candidates have said anything like the following? Romney? McCain? Goulinai?

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=279987
 
The GOP didn't lose the election because of the war. They lost it because they failed to be conservative and do conservative things, like cut spending, make tax cuts permanent or tax reform, repeal gun control, etc...

True. And FT is in line on those issues.
 
Gaiudo, Ron Paul has said more.

pcosmar, you are right, Dr.Paul is very strong on Federalism, however the question Gaiudo asked referred to electable candidates which is where I think Ron Paul has a big problem. As I said, I like the guy and I wish we had more like him in Congress but he is not electable for President.
 
Last edited:
pcosmar, I agree. And I really like Ron Paul too. However, just because Ron Paul has said MORE doesn't negate what Fred HAS said.

And then to claim that everyone in the race besides Dr. Paul is just the same suit and haircut is either ignorant or intentionally misleading.

I certainly don't hear any of the other candidates making similar statements other than by the rightly exalted Dr. Paul. And to tell the truth, many of the statements I hear on THR and similar forums stink of in-house cannibalism, in hopes of elevating the pet candidate. Just because FT isn't quite Ron Paul doesn't mean he is Rudy G. Let at least show some intellectual honesty about it all.
 
I found Fred interesting at first glance, however as a member of the CFR and his stand as a globalist have turned me off.
He seems better than most of the field, but that may be just good acting.
As to Dr. Paul being unelectable, that is yet to be seen.
He is growing in popularity as he gets known.
Contributions have doubled after the last debate.
The next debate is June 5, and we are getting his name out in the public, despite resistance.
I hope for change.
 
FT is head and shoulders above every candidate on the GOP side. Articulate, easy speaking manner and doesn't talk a lot of BS like most politicians. Fred has the most Federalist stance of any of the ELECTABLE candidates. Sorry, Paul has no chance and most of his new donations are from Democrats who like to watch him screw with the GOP establishment. Good entertainment but nothing more. I suspect when the dust settles and Fred is the Nominee that many hear will grow to like him especially while Hillary is telling America her plans to take "from those with the ability, to those with the needs".:eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top