To Fudd or not to Fudd...That is the Question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Going for a lower accuracy semi is not the way of the Fudd. A single shot is going Fudd throttle. Henry makes a .223 Single shot rifle, and that one's got walnut on it! ;)

Sell that dreadful black rifle and enjoy the Fudd! :)
 
Geez,
I guess you called my hand!
Here’s the target

It was meant to be light hearted ribbing, but on a more serious note, 3 shots is not a group for accuracy claims, and unless it can do it reliably, saying "shoots" isn't quantifiable. I have a Century C91 that once printed a five shot one hole group @ 100. And maybe I could get it to do that again if I fired a few hundred groups and the stars aligned just right. But the average is 2-2.5 MOA. Unless you have targets full of 5 shot groups that size and can make another one any time, your rifle is not a .4 MOA rifle.
 
Oh yeah guys heres the 2nd prototype mini 14.
Go ahead you can laugh at 4 pieces of 1/2” x 12” key stock and 3 hose clamps!
Sorry I didn’t get a pic of first prototype with only two 1/2” x 12” key stock and 2 hose clamps
But as funny as it is, it cut 3” groups to 1 1/2”
Hum? This might just have promise. 575883D8-20C6-44FF-8C0E-456B6FAF6F2A.jpeg
 
This lead to the third prototype.
I’m sorry to say this is where project stopped.
My quest was to prove that a stock mini 14 would shoot sub moa with minimal cash outlay!
And it will
So on to another quest! B85D4B0A-9D4A-4558-8F30-672A5A0F7583.jpeg
Thanks guys for jogging my memory on that quest 2-3 years ago. I posted a thread on it here then. Might want to pull it up if you’re interested. It was fun!!!
 
No. But, I'm biased, I thought the Mini-14 was over priced when it was i nthe Montgomery Wards catalog at $149.95

Also, "Fudd" is not about one's tastes in guns. Being a Fudd is about being a gun-owning turtle; I gots mine, and the rest can be banned and I doan care! A Fudd owns a Model 70 in .30-06 and never shoots it. Ditto the Wingmaster and the S&W revolver in the nightstand (which probably is not loaded, as ammo is not generally sold 6 at a time).

So, the question may be poorly formed.

Now, if you posed it as an AR versus, say, a CZ 507, or a 527, that might be a different question indeed.
 
This lead to the third prototype.
I’m sorry to say this is where project stopped.
My quest was to prove that a stock mini 14 would shoot sub moa with minimal cash outlay!
And it will
So on to another quest!View attachment 826609
Thanks guys for jogging my memory on that quest 2-3 years ago. I posted a thread on it here then. Might want to pull it up if you’re interested. It was fun!!!
But that is no longer a stock Mini 14.
 
I disagree. It is totally stock as absolutely no parts were modified on the original rifle. I didn’t even mess with the gas port! Cases still end up in next county!

But again this was MY quest to see if a stock mini 14 could be made to shoot sub MOA at very minimal cost. Some add a “M14” strut looking thing.
I accomplished the same with just an old rusty piece of 1 1/4” conveyor shaft. Total cost outlay $0.00.
-Note the quest is unfinished as I still need to shorten the barrel sleeve and turn it down to point accuracy begins to deteriorate. Ah one day when I get time-

Again this was a very rewarding quest that anyone can do at home and at a minimal cost! So yes the mini is a great rifle!!!!!
 
Let me lay the groundwork on this quandary. I'm kinda old school in my tastes, perhaps a bit on the fuddy side. I prefer 1911's to Glocks, M1 Carbines to M4 Carbines, wood to polymer...for the most part. A couple of years ago I bought a S&W M&P 15 Sport II because, you know, 'Murica. It's good, don't get me wrong, hasn't missed a beat or given me a lick of trouble. Runs like sewing machine...like a soulless, nondescript sewing machine.
I see today someone nearby has a 1982 Mini14 in stainless with a walnut stock, the stock has seen better days. He'd like to sell or trade for an Ar15. I think I'd like a Mini 14 with a wood stock, but from what I've heard the older 14's are less than stellar. I'm not looking for a sub MOA tack driver, or something to do mag dumps with, but something that's fun at the range that I can also take on a hog hunt. I shoot my M1 Carbine better than the AR15, but would like something with a bit more punch than 30 carbine, and a bit more personality than the AR15.
So, what say you? Would you trade an entry level Ar15 for an early 80's mini14?

I would not. I have a couple early '80's Mini-14's (plastic w/ folding stock) used for home defense where the range is much less than 100 yds so accuracy is not an issue while compactness is. I also have many AR's to which I have added various accessories, changed out stocks, etc according to purpose.

I prefer the AR's because they are much more 'standard' in that it's easy to modify them. Easier to find magazines that work reliably, etc.

That said, if you want a wood-stocked min-14 you should get it.
 
Took the M&P out today to the outdoor 100yrd range. I'm starting to warm up to her. Just with the mbus flip ups that came with it, I was getting pretty tight groups, 1.5" or so and even managed to find the bullseye. I couldn't manage that with the m1 carbine today. That was getting 2"-3"...seems to be zeroed at maybe 150 yards, everything was hitting high. Honestly, I was happy to be doing as well as I was with open sights, but was rather impressed with the AR15. I may have spoken too soon about its lack of soul...its starting to grow on me
 
I can't understand the continued ability of Ruger to sell the Mini 14. There was a time when it was sold almost like the poor man's AR-15, and I remember considering one back in the 1990's when it still cost a couple hundred dollars more to buy an AR-15. But, the AR-15 is more reliable, more accurate, more customizable, more durable, and cheaper. It's a hard sell for the Mini 14 these days, at least for me.
 
Different rifles fit different people differently. There's ergonomic fit, economic fit, and personality fit. Add it all up and figure the best fit.
 
sometimes a person just wants a particular gun, and it's not really up to anyone else. That's the point of a free market and choice. It's when they start passing laws restricting your choice where it becomes a problem.
 
sometimes a person just wants a particular gun, and it's not really up to anyone else. That's the point of a free market and choice. It's when they start passing laws restricting your choice where it becomes a problem.

I don't disagree at all. But when the closing statement of the OP is:

So, what say you? Would you trade an entry level Ar15 for an early 80's mini14?

That's a solicitation for opinions.

This ain't a mini-14 thread getting beaten to death by AR guys. While that does happen, this one was specifically about trading an AR for a mini, and what the community thought of that idea.
 
I guess I look at FUDDs as something separate from the guns they clutch onto. There are lots of nice classic guns both old, and new ones coming out that cater to that side of the market place.
 
A pistol gripped, folding stock SBR with a flash hider and a 20 rounder hanging out of it doesn't exactly fall into the FUDD category that the ranch rifle does. Would have been an AW under the Klinton ban!
lol! A FUDD gun to me is wood stocked, not all tacticooled out. I guess my 5 AKs, all with wood furniture wouldn't count either....
 
It is a sharp-looking piece with the folder, but I had issues with the one I briefly had on mine. Original stock was cracked badly (it had been a sheepherders rifle), so I jumped at the chance to dress mine up like the A-team (don't judge me people).

Looked great, made it carry small, but was next to impossible for me to get a decent cheek weld. Ended up getting an aftermarket synthetic in the same style as the original.
 
Bersaguy I feel your pain.

I know AR's are accurate, last time I "had" to go to a public range, I saw a guy shooting his AR and getting really nice 25 yd. groups! :D Seriously, I am completely on board with the OP. AR's are soul-less, everybody has one (I have two and a receiver waiting on me to decide what to build next), yawn.....they all look alike, etc.

But most everything posted here about the Mini's is spot-on. I had an older pencil barrel Mini that was almost as accurate as my 870 Wingmaster shotgun with a load of buckshot. I traded it for a newer model with the heavier tapered barrel and it was much more accurate. But I bought the Mini to carry while I was on the tractor or in the truck driving around the pasture. I realized pretty quick that I didn't want to carry something that expensive swinging from the fender of my tractor, so I sold it. But I must say their actions or really simple and rugged. I like the idea of not spewing gas into the action to operate it.

To the OP, here's a pretty decent compromise-

Keltec%20SU16A-1_zpskor2rpiy.jpg

I bought one of these several years ago and I love it. It's much more trim than and handy than an AR, has simple but rugged sights and is way more accurate than my Mini and nearly as accurate as a stock AR, and uses AR magazines. And you'll never do this with an AR or a Mini-

Keltec%20Under%20Seat-1_zpsidd4tgmi.jpg

That's a shot of the rifle in a storage compartment under the back seat of one of my pickups.

35W
 
Bersaguy I feel your pain.

I know AR's are accurate, last time I "had" to go to a public range, I saw a guy shooting his AR and getting really nice 25 yd. groups! :D Seriously, I am completely on board with the OP. AR's are soul-less, everybody has one (I have two and a receiver waiting on me to decide what to build next), yawn.....they all look alike, etc.

35W
Not all AR's look alike. No gun has a soul, but some can find a place in your hart.
Come and Take It!
index.php
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top