Acera
Member
Has anyone reported it to the website? They have a contact button for reporting such a violation.
Too TactiCool for School
- Thread starter Blarelli
- Start date
- Status
burningsquirrels
Member
Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow
member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 13,146
Here's an interesting legal question for ya (assuming he has no special tax stamps with this gun):
1. If he put the buttstock on before he put the front grip on, then he is guilty of (a) assembling/possessing an SBR, and then also guilty of (b) assembling /possessing an AOW once the grip was put on.
2. BUT, if he put the foregrip on FIRST, at which time he was guilty of assembling/possessing an AOW, THEN, when he also added the buttstock, did he also build an SBR at that point? Or is there *NO* SBR, because once it became an AOW, adding the buttstock still left it just an AOW, albeit in a bit of a different configuration?
In other words, did the order in which he assembled it make the difference between him committing one crime, versus two crimes?
Or, better yet, going back to #1, once the SBR has been built, legally or not, is then adding a foregrip to an SBR perfectly OK without a special license (since, once it became an SBR, it was no longer a handgun, to which the adding of a foregrip creates an AOW), and therefore only 1 crime under scenario #1.
We actually might have 2 crimes or only 1 under scenario #1. We also might have 2 crimes, or only 1, under scenario #2. So, arguably, four possible outcomes there....
Let that stew around awhile.
In his defense, I think that mount is high enough to allow see-through use of the irons. And boy is that ever using the word "irons" loosely (Glock).
Hector the Mormon?
It actually wouldn't be a half-bad CQB weapon, espec. if suppressed.
1. If he put the buttstock on before he put the front grip on, then he is guilty of (a) assembling/possessing an SBR, and then also guilty of (b) assembling /possessing an AOW once the grip was put on.
2. BUT, if he put the foregrip on FIRST, at which time he was guilty of assembling/possessing an AOW, THEN, when he also added the buttstock, did he also build an SBR at that point? Or is there *NO* SBR, because once it became an AOW, adding the buttstock still left it just an AOW, albeit in a bit of a different configuration?
In other words, did the order in which he assembled it make the difference between him committing one crime, versus two crimes?
Or, better yet, going back to #1, once the SBR has been built, legally or not, is then adding a foregrip to an SBR perfectly OK without a special license (since, once it became an SBR, it was no longer a handgun, to which the adding of a foregrip creates an AOW), and therefore only 1 crime under scenario #1.
We actually might have 2 crimes or only 1 under scenario #1. We also might have 2 crimes, or only 1, under scenario #2. So, arguably, four possible outcomes there....
Let that stew around awhile.
In his defense, I think that mount is high enough to allow see-through use of the irons. And boy is that ever using the word "irons" loosely (Glock).
Hector the Mormon?
It actually wouldn't be a half-bad CQB weapon, espec. if suppressed.
Mad Magyar
Member
I'm lost...What's going on?
burningsquirrels
Member
The Tourist
member
wizzegun said:
If that thing makes cappuccino, you'll have to out-bid me for it!
Ya' know, I like mall ninja threads. It's a part of our sport, nothing wrong with a little humor in discussing guns.
I'm even thinking about taking my digital camera to East Towne Mall when I get the hankerin' for an Arby's, and tell the cammo'ed victim his picture will appear in THR.
nalioth
Member
You cannot have an AOW with a buttstock. It'd be a SBR with one, AOW without. 10 year minimum vacation regardless.PremiumSauces said:
nwilliams
Member
Why is everyone assuming this is an illegal sale? The seller could very well be registered to own an SBR in which case there is nothing illegal about him selling it. As long as the seller and buyer are both registered to own an SBR then there is nothing illegal here.
Jumping to the conclusion that this guy is a criminal because he is selling a gun that requires a tax stamp is a little premature. Knowing all the facts before making an accusation is always a good idea.
Not saying this is a legal sale, however I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it isn't either. I would just feel bad if I made an accusation and then found out he was a legitimate tax stamp holder and perfectly within his rights. JMHO
Oh and yes that think is just a little too mall ninja for my tastes
Jumping to the conclusion that this guy is a criminal because he is selling a gun that requires a tax stamp is a little premature. Knowing all the facts before making an accusation is always a good idea.
Not saying this is a legal sale, however I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it isn't either. I would just feel bad if I made an accusation and then found out he was a legitimate tax stamp holder and perfectly within his rights. JMHO
Oh and yes that think is just a little too mall ninja for my tastes
burningsquirrels
Member
well there goes the fun in the thread. LOL!
but if he's class 3 you'd think he'd have better channels for selling it than a mediocre website.
but if he's class 3 you'd think he'd have better channels for selling it than a mediocre website.
burningsquirrels
Member
ah, ok, then that explains it. it's wierd for me to see that on sale like that. at least i don't think we have anything like that here, but i could be wrong!
dwave
Member
He is a might touchy. Doesn't look good to put that on his sale either, makes him look like a dumb looser that can't handle any criticism.
Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow
member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 13,146
Or he could be trying to cover himself.
Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow
member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 13,146
That's what I was thinking. He'd have to find a helluva sucker to make that deal.
I did say in my post on the first page: *IF* he doesn't have any special tax stamps.
burningsquirrels
Member
well, at least his professional communications skills are first class.
SCPigpen
Member
I suspect the ATF will be making him an offer for that item.
Squidward
Member
Burningsquirrels,
That "holster" is very funny
That "holster" is very funny
- Status
