Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

"Trigger Pull" vs. "Trigger Action"

Discussion in 'NFA Firearms and Accessories' started by Iramo94, Aug 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Iramo94

    Iramo94 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    South Florida
    Hello Everyone.

    The following question spawned out of the Over/Under shotgun thread found here. The point was raised there that a Mini-14 can fire 2 shots per pull if the second shot is set to go off on the trigger reset, thereby making 1 shot per "action."

    Question: Can a sear have multiple teeth in it, like a cog in a clock? Can it then fire any number of rounds sequentially all from one "pull?" In my mind, each of those clicks would count as its own "action." (Example: gatling guns, one very long circular pull, but multiple actions) I'm thinking you could then make a rifle with a 3/4" and 6 pound pull. Cut three teeth onto the sear for one shot for each 1/4" and 2 pound increment. Voila', 3 round burst.

    Would that be unregistered legal? :confused:

    By the way, I'm sorry if this sub-forum is the wrong place for this thread. It seemed suitable...

    Disclaimer: Dear ATF, this is not an attempt to "manufacture" a "machine gun." Nor is it an attempt to manufacture any other firearm for anything other than personal use. All examples and ideas presented here exist entirely in the realm of theory, and no illegal action is intended, nor will any illegal action follow this line of thought.
     
  2. AlexanderA

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,861
    Location:
    Virginia
    Read this:

    http://www.atf.gov/regulations-rulings/rulings/atf-rulings/atf-ruling-2006-2.pdf

    The NFA defines a machine gun as “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger." The above-cited ruling goes on to say that the legislative history of the NFA equated “single function of the trigger” with “single pull of the trigger.”

    Your proposal is pretty clearly a machine gun.
     
  3. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    Yeah, that'd be a machine gun. A single, strong pull (one action) being three shots, versus the pull/release Mini-14 being two actions (pull, release).
     
  4. Iramo94

    Iramo94 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification. Silly ATF, always getting in the way. :banghead:
     
  5. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    When it comes to guns, it seems to be that if it's fun, you haven't seen it anywhere before, and it would save you the money of buying X, Y, Z, then it's probably illegal... ;)
     
  6. GLOOB

    GLOOB Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    5,940
    Are there not double barreled shotguns/rifles that break this rule?

    Here's an idea. How about you put two triggers on the gun, so you can pull them alternating, really, really fast? Or maybe if you pulled both triggers, you'd get a 2 round burst?

    Or heck, put 3 narrow triggers side-by-side, so you could pull them all with one pull, firing 3 shots!
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2011
  7. Iramo94

    Iramo94 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    South Florida
    PTK, ain't that the truth...

    Edit: Gloob, you might have a point there...how about combine my idea with yours, make one trigger break at two pounds, the next a little heavier, and the next heavier still. Have three separate sears and hammers that all hit the same firing pin, and shoot through the same barrel. That would make a nice and tidy three round burst if you pulled slow enough.
     
  8. GLOOB

    GLOOB Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    5,940
    I'm thinking a step further. To reduce the law to the flawed collections of imperfect language that it is. Take multiple triggers to an electronic circuit. When 1 trigger is pulled (with a needle, or something:)), you get one shot. When 2 triggers are pulled, you get 2 shots in rapid succession. Etc. Maybe you could fit 5 or 6 triggers, even. Per the most literal interpretation of the law that would appear to be legal, since you can shoot a double barreled shotgun with both barrels.
     
  9. ccsniper

    ccsniper member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,621
    Location:
    midwest Arkansas
    HOLD IT!! A mini 14 can be made to fire by pulling and releasing the trigger and it aint illegal? ATF (aka anti fun) must be sleeping on the job
     
  10. shotgunjoel

    shotgunjoel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,572
    Location:
    illinois
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhuQOZSwFvY
     
  11. ccsniper

    ccsniper member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,621
    Location:
    midwest Arkansas
    well, then... just wait, the ATF will find a way to call it a machine gun and ruin it for the rest of us
     
  12. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    I used to think that, too, but that sort of thing has been around for YEARS. The BATFE doesn't care, they even sent out some letters to the effect of pull/release being two actions and thus perfectly legal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page