UN definition of firearm

[LAR-15]

For the purposes of this Protocol:
(a) “Firearm” shall mean any portable barrelled weapon that expels, is
designed to expel or may be readily converted to expel a shot, bullet or projectile by
action of an explosive, excluding antique firearms or their replicas. Antique
firearms and their replicas shall be defined in accordance with domestic law. In no
case, however, shall antique firearms include firearms manufactured after 1899;

 

[NCP24]

All hail to the Mighty UN the Great! Bow before the presence of immanence you peasants.

The UN can kiss my international royal whatzit

 

[kikilee]

All hail to the Mighty UN the Great! Bow before the presence of immanence you peasants.

The UN can kiss my international royal whatzit

NCP24 - Don't SUGARCOAT it, tell it llike it is!


.

 

[Flatfender]

I got your firearm right here...

 

[MechAg94]

So is slower burning powder really an explosive?

I guess deadly air rifles are not included.

 

[DeseoUnTaco]

 

[TexasRifleman]

Smokeless powder is not classified as an explosive is it?

That means my AR is not a firearm right? Woo Hoo!!!!

Or, if I bolt my AR to the table then it's no longer portable, thus not a firearm.
What if I bolt it to the hood of my car, on a turret?

 

[geekWithA.45]

The UN definition of firearm is completely irrelevant without a blue helmet to enforce it.

Blue helmets are fair targets on American soil.

Whenever they want to play that game, I'm good to go in 60 seconds.

 

[Lupinus]

The UN is the biggist waste of office space in America. *** do we still house these violenty anti american third world morons?

I swear if they hate us so friggin much maybe Paris would be a better place for them. The UN is USELESS. They are no longer the United Nations they are now the Useless Nutballs. Kick them out and refuse to take part in any further actions they do. Cause of course, the UN was created to keep brutal tyrants from murdering their own people. Great job they are doing eh? The UN is utterly usless. Kick them out bulldoze the building and put a friggin Armory on the vaccant lot in the shape of a big raised middle finger pointed right at paris.

 

[Standing Wolf]

I think we should just send the United Nations to Zimbabwe and skip all the kissing.

 

[Lupinus]

oh Ihave something the UN can kiss on its way out

 

[donkee]

+1 Geek!

 

[Hkmp5sd]

IMO, they should pick up the UN building and all associated personnel and transplant them into downtown Baghdad.

 

[Oldtimer]

The United Nations has been a total farce for several years. Was it the UN that set up the "coalition forces" during the original Gulf War?
NOPE! The UN did, however, print the "sanction" that President Bush #41 adhered to, by not rolling into Baghdad and destroying Saddam! Then, the UN issued a total of 17 "sanctions" against Saddam, threatening him with "severe and harsh penalties" if he didn't comply.....BUT, at the same time, the UN had set up the "oil for food" program with Saddam, which proved to be a VERY profitable program for numerous UN officials! Then, when President Bush #43 approached the UN for the purpose of finding out what their "severe and harsh penalties" consisted of, since Saddam had NOT complied with any of those "sanctions", the UN didn't want their "money making machine" in Iraq to end. President Bush #43 chose to form ANOTHER coalition of forces to deal with Saddam....and believe it or not, there were MORE countries involved in that second coalition than there had been in the FIRST Gulf War! It was hilarious, how the UN condemned the USA for taking on Saddam in a "unilateral" attack!

No, I'm not pleased with everything that Bush #43 has done, but by standing up AGAINST the UN was certainly a bright moment! In the long run, I truly believe that our current actions in Iraq will pay us BIG dividends in the way of security for our nation. The Iraqi war is OVER, even though the mainstream news media still calls it a "war". The "insurgency" is nothing more than terrorism being carried out against an emerging, free Islamic country! It is NOT another Vietnam, and while I mourn for all of our troops that have been killed or injured, the numbers are FAR lower than what the liberal/leftist/Democrat folks had anticipated!

 

[CAS700850]

You know, I worry very little about the U.N. (right up until the U.S. government starts following and accepting the U.N. party lines). So long as the U.S. is a sovereign nation, the U.N. can do or say whaever they want. From what I've seen, the U.N. cannot even put together a successful peacekeeping operation without NATO (U.S.) involvement. Do we really think that the U.N. can suddenly put together an effective force to impose its will on the U.S.?

Nah, so long as we, the people, continue to maintain a government that doesn't subscribe to U.N. mandates, etc., they can say whatever they want. We just have to make sure our "leaders" stay independent.

 

[Werewolf]

We just have to make sure our "leaders" stay independent.

GAWD! Optimists! Gotta love'em...

 

[armoredman]

Up the UN. Here's a couple of targets for ya...

 

[NCP24]

Now I understand why those SS109's were tested on blue helmets.

 

[Molon Labe]

U.N. Definition of a Firearm

I have a definition of the U.N. But I'm confident my posting privileges will be yanked if I reveal it.

 

[fletcher]

They must hate potato cannons, too.