DeseoUnTaco
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
- Messages
- 290
First the Economist, and then the UN! I don't know what you can do, but it's disgusting. They should be promoting arming of peasants (esp. women) around the world.
JPEG image files are pretty sanitary when it comes to extra info. JPEG "headers" (no formal headers, just the start of the file) don't have much: image size, number of color components (color depth), and sampling factors for the color components.good chance that whatever program was used to edit the image left a little fingerprint of some sort in the headers of the file
Exactly. Also their web host is one set up to host leftist causes, so they think that everything is protected by either the First Amendment or the "justness" of their causes. They routinely ignore "take down" demands.Maybe contact IANSA on this? It's tough to fight something like this. IANSA is a shadowy off-shore organization with involvement in the international arms trade, unlike the Economist which is easy to get in contact with.
Not so.For instance, if you are a novelist and you write a novel, and you e-mail it to your publisher, who owns the novel? Hotmail owns it. You use Hotmail, they own what you send.
Doesn't look like they modified it much except to crop it. A pretty skillful nab.