Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Unannounced Gun Control

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by YankeeClipper, Jul 24, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. YankeeClipper

    YankeeClipper Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    96
    Location:
    Havre,Montana
    1 With out some of us noticing the Government, walking hand in hand with the ATF and the Shumers and Kennedy's have lowered the bar for felenies that have nothing to do with violence or firearms to releave the general population of the 2nd amendment rights. So God fearing, NRA good people have fallen pray to this ruling. Remember the democrats never saw a gun control rule or law they didn't like and the Republicans break out in hives at the thought of someone saying they might be soft on crime. Tell your representation you are on to them and this move. It wouldn't hurt to send a short note to the NRA. We need help here and fast.
     
  2. org

    org Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    153
    Could you be a little more specific?
     
  3. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    I've always noticed that I can type more clearly if I remove the tinfoil first.
     
  4. YankeeClipper

    YankeeClipper Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    96
    Location:
    Havre,Montana
    I'm on my way to Church now I will give you the full story later. When you see it and how clever it worked you will see Lottenburg all over it. Thanks for reading and your questions.
     
  5. rick_reno

    rick_reno member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,027
    My dog mentioned this to me this morning but couldn't provide the details - the aliens attacking with their killer rays required his immediate attention.
     
  6. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Yeah, way to take the high road, bogie, rick_reno. Real nice.
     
  7. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,272
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    We need more details, as well as a source for the information. Without that, the post doesn't help much, unfortunately.
     
  8. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    Justin, don't worry.

    Don't feel left out.

    They're out to get you to!

    The bats! The bats!
     
  9. DirksterG30

    DirksterG30 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    625
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Maybe this is what he's talking about

    House Passes Extreme Penalties For Some Who Use Guns In Self-Defense
    -- Bill could also make your hunting party a "criminal street gang"

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org

    Tuesday, June 28, 2005


    Let's assume that you and your family are on your way home from church. You have a gun in the glove compartment that is there for self-protection.

    After driving within 1,000 feet of a school (which is almost unavoidable), you stop by the grocery store to pick up a few items for lunch.

    As you are exiting your car, you are approached by a gang of teenagers, armed with long screwdrivers and wrenches. Realizing that you are about to be mugged, you brandish your firearm in order to scare them off -- although this act on your part is a violation of state law which requires that you first retreat, rather than defend yourself.

    Congratulations. Under legislation that recently passed the House, all the members of your family are now subject to a MANDATORY MINIMUM sentence of ten years in prison -- and up to life imprisonment.

    The judge would have NO DISCRETION to release you before the end of the ten-year period -- but an anti-gun judge could sentence you and your family to LIFE IMPRISONMENT.

    Sound ridiculous? Welcome to the new "tough-on-crime" House of Representatives.

    It's not as though Republicans like House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) have no experience with the "unintended" broad consequences of anti-gun laws.

    Remember the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO)? That bill was passed with the ostensible purpose of going after the Mafia.

    But it was poorly drafted. At its core, a person or business only had to commit two of a broad list of sometimes-fairly-innocuous crimes in order to be subject to stiff prison sentences. As a result, lawsuits and criminal prosecutions soon sprouted against legitimate banks and businesses and pro-life protestors.

    Never capable of learning from its mistakes, Congress is about to go after gun owners in the same way.

    This new bill -- touted as anti-gang legislation -- is numbered H.R.
    1279 in the House, where it passed by a 279-144 margin on May 11.
    Twenty Republicans -- including pro-gun stalwarts like John Hostettler (R-IN), Ron Paul (R-TX), and Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) -- voted against it. It now goes to the Senate, where its counterpart (S. 155) is sponsored by anti-gun zealot Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT).

    Similar to RICO, these two bills, at the core, would define "criminal street gangs" to be formal OR INFORMAL groups of three or more individuals who commit two or more of a long list of "predicate"
    crimes.

    What are these predicate crimes, of which two or more could get you thrown into the slammer for the rest of your life? Check these out:

    * Violation of the Kohl 1,000-foot "gun-free-school-zone" law would be a predicate crime in the House bill.

    * Having a gun in violation of the Lautenberg amendment -- because you spanked your kid or spat on your husband -- would be a predicate in both the House and Senate versions.

    * Accidentally shooting a doe instead of a buck (or shooting the wrong kind of duck) would be a "crime of violence" (under the 18 U.S.C. 16 definition) and could therefore be a "predicate" crime if some of the worst provisions from both bills end up in the final version that goes to the President.

    And, as mentioned above, your family's trip past the school -- as you're driving home from church -- could send all of you to jail if you use your gun in self-defense, rather than first retreating as required in some states.

    This is because:

    * A "criminal street gang" exists as soon as this "informal" group of 3 or more individuals (your family) commits "2 or more gang crimes... in relation to the group" if one of the crimes is a "crime of violence."

    * Violation of the Kohl "gun-free-school-zone" amendment (18 U.S.C.
    922(q)) is a "gang crime."

    * The threat to use a firearm against the muggers is both a gang crime and a crime of violence because it involves a "threat" of "force" against a person.


    The bills have other anti-gun provisions, as well:

    1. Mandatory Prison Sentences For Gun Owners

    The "street gang" provisions in the bill (as mentioned above) could send you and your family to jail for 10 years-to-life if you defend them with a gun under certain conditions.

    But even apart from those RICO-style provisions in the bill, there is other language in the bill that could send you to jail for twenty years MINIMUM if you use a gun in self-defense... even without your family being nearby.

    Federal law prohibits the mere possession of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. The term "crime of violence"
    clearly includes brandishing or even opening your coat to display a firearm to defend yourself against a mugger -- without retreating -- in states that require retreat. Hence, a concealed carry permit holder who opens his suit jacket and displays a firearm to a potential mugger in these states is liable under this section because "crime of violence" means the threatened use of force against person or property.

    Section 114 of H.R. 1279 would increase the MINIMUM penalty for shooting the mugger (i.e., a Bernie Goetz-type offense) to TWENTY years in prison.

    2. Expanding The Lautenberg Gun Ban

    Section 109 of the House bill -- and its counterpart on the Senate version -- makes it more likely that a person will NOT get bail if they possessed a firearm after committing a "Lautenberg misdemeanor."
    Again, a person could be held to commit such a misdemeanor if the person spanked their kid or spat on their spouse. So for having committed this small infraction (and for owning a gun) a person faces a higher probability of being held in jail until trial.

    ACTION: Contact your United States senators. Ask them to oppose anti-gun so-called "gang" legislation.

    You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators a pre-written e-mail message.

    -----Pre-written letter-----

    Dear Senator:

    H.R. 1279 and its counterpart, S. 155, are supposedly "anti-gang"
    measures. But they are so poorly drafted that they could lead to lifetime prison sentences for fathers who protect their families from muggers.

    Under H.R. 1279, a family which drives within 1,000 feet of a school (which is almost unavoidable) with a gun in the glove compartment could be a criminal gang if the father or mother brandished the gun to scare off a mugger. All members of the family could be subject to a MANDATORY MINIMUM sentence of ten years in prison -- and up to life imprisonment, at the discretion of the court.

    The Senate bill is only slightly better.

    Please oppose these anti-gun abominations.

    Sincerely,


    ****************************

    Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will bounce back as undeliverable.

    To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm on the web. Change of e-mail address may also be made at that location.
     
  10. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,272
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    We can't stop here! This is bat country!
     
  11. veloce851

    veloce851 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    RayMO
    I don't think he's being paranoid at all... based on what little information that was given. He makes a good point.

    Little by little we are being turned into felons for doing things that less than 10 or 20 years ago would have been considered normal. Just take most if not all of the provisions in the AWB that just ended *thank God*
    Many of those "rules" made many of us, law abiding good citizens, felons.
    Had we been caught and successfully charged we would have been stripped of our right to bear arms.

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws...you create a nation of law-breakers and then you cash in on guilt."
    Ayn Rand
     
  12. GunGoBoom

    GunGoBoom member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,645
    RICO was abused - this will be too - anyone know the status of it now?
     
  13. scubie02

    scubie02 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Messages:
    916
    Location:
    ny
    I'm with you--too many rude peeople on this board that immediately jump in with ridicule, often in a fairly offensive manner.

    The poster is correct. Many "crimes" that once upon a time nobody would have been very concerned about have been turned into felonies. You can lose your gun rights just for being accused of domestic violence, which is a common divorce tactic when trying to get custody--claim domestic violence, which doesn't even have to be physical violence, it can be "psychological"--so you can lose your rights because she says you once called her fat. Seems to go along with what the original poster was saying to me.

    The local distruct attorney guy told me not so long ago that basically if you get into almosy ANY sort of scrape--DWI, whatever--even f its not violent or a felony, they will yank your permit.
     
  14. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,232
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    I got as far as the part about "...the Government, walking hand in hand with the ATF..."

    The ATF is a government agency - part of the goverment. Right? That walking hand in hand stuff makes about as much sense as saying the U.S. Park Service is walking hand in hand with the government. Calling Captain Obvious, come in please. ;)

    John
     
  15. CentralTexas

    CentralTexas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,235
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    For those not awake

    this has become a real issue. Many laws that were once misdemeanor offenses are felonies. There are may group lobbying for more felony laws. Do some research on how we have gone from "The defense industry" to the "Prison industry".
    How about a few Texas agriculture laws that are felonies?


    Operating a Grain Warehouse Without a License
    Unlawful Grain Delivery
    Fraudulently Issuing a Grain Scale Weight Ticket or Receipt
    Changing a Grain Receipt or Scale Weight Ticket
    Depositing Grain Without Title
    Selling Horsemeat for Human Consumption
    Here is the actual statute-
    149.003. TRANSFER OF HORSEMEAT
    (a) A person commits an offense if the person:

    (1) transfers horsemeat to a person who intends to sell the horsemeat, offer or exhibit it for sale, or possess it for sale as food for human consumption; and
    (2) knows or in the exercise of reasonable discretion should know that the person receiving the horsemeat intends to sell the horsemeat, offer or exhibit it for sale, or possess it for sale as food for human consumption.

    Wow, we actually have horse slaughter houses here and we export the meat for human consumption to France and Germany but if a Texan want's some....
    Here are a few more random ones-
    Selling or Manufacturing Alcohol in a Dry Area
    Making a Loan to a Candidate or Officeholder from a Non-Financial Corporation
    Making a Contribution to a Political Party from a Corporation or Labor Union Less than 60 Days Before an Election
    Defamation of a Credit Union
    Disposing of Litter in a Cave
    Illegally Operating a Bingo Game
    Possessing a Live Wolf



    Here are a few more. Some folks better spend more time learning and seeing what is happenening aound them and less time being schoolyard bullies.
    CT :fire: :banghead: :fire:
     
  16. CentralTexas

    CentralTexas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,235
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    Oh yeah-

    These are all non-penal code offenses....
    CT
     
  17. RevDisk

    RevDisk Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,737
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Okey, I'll try to cut this up into slightly more understandable chunks.

    1. ATF and "Shumers and Kennedy's". - You do realize we have a one party government at the moment. Here's a hint, it's not Democrat that handed down the most recent ATF determination re part kits and C&R weapons. Gonzales, and to an extent Bush, are responsible for it. ATF is part of the DoJ.

    2. Creation of new categories of felonies and expansion of current categories. - Yep. I can agree that it's a bad thing. I believe the US has the highest percentage of its population in prison, in the entire world. Impressive, really.

    3. God fearing, NRA good people - Uhm. More than just "God fearing" and "NRA good people" are being punished by these swarms of new laws. I believe that atheists, agnostics, polytheists, etc are equally deserving of justice. Ditto non-NRA members like myself. I donate (only a few bucks, I'm not rich) to the NRA, but mostly to the JPFO and the GOA. NRA is rather partisan, thus my donations are adjusted according to their partisanship. Plus, I don't want to be badgered. The GOA and JPFO are more non-partisan, take a harder line on the 2A, and don't badger their membership as much.

    4. Democrats love gun control, Republicans dislike being soft on crime - Yea, unfortunately Democrats love gun control a little too much, and some of us try to work on changing that. As for Republicans... Heh. I'm not sure which I hate more. The War on Drugs or gun control. Gun control has not caused the horrors of the new "search and seizure" laws. The Republicans have indeed focused on gutting other aspects of the Bill of Rights moreso than the Second Amendment, I agree. But protecting one amendment and gutting the rest is not a good thing in my book.

    Tell ya what. I'll work hard at trying to bring more understanding of the Second Amendment with the Democrats, you try to convince the Republicans to stop gutting the rest of the BoR. Deal?
     
  18. jefnvk

    jefnvk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,938
    Location:
    The Copper Country, Michigan
    If people would bother to clarif what they are talking about when they post something, rather than rambling about hating the gov't and so on, there would be far fewer problems.
     
  19. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Right, so instead of giving him a chance to later, we should jump all over him and ask questions later?


    I learned my lesson about being polite to EVERYONE until they can at least make their position known. Then if you disagree with them, go right ahead with the mockery. :D
     
  20. Majic

    Majic Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,370
    Location:
    Virginia
    How much more time do you give in this situation? He posted this morning and now this evening he hasn't posted back. There has been a discussion about what he may have meant, but we have yet to find out exactly what he was talking about.
     
  21. org

    org Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    153
    I could be wrong (I frequently am) but wasn't the "1000 ft. gun free zone" around schools ruled unconstitutional? I do know for a fact that in some states CCW holders can carry on school property if their states say so.

    Not to completely diminish the various gun owners organizations, but it seems they are becoming more shrill as time goes on. If they confined themselves to the facts, instead of hyping every remotely bad law that comes along, their credibility would be a lot higher. I wonder if it's that with the lack of real gun control laws coming along these days the money is drying up, so they're trying to scare up donations, pun intended.

    :confused:
     
  22. Kamicosmos

    Kamicosmos Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,331
    Location:
    Kansas City, Missouri
    I asked at Mocarry about the school zone thing. My real life example is that I live in a school zone, one block away from an elementary school.

    So, if I'm out walking my dog and have my CCW with me, what could happen? Even if nothing happens regarding the gun in a violent way, I might just accidently expose the gun or maybe Officer Friendly feels like running my ID that day.

    It was basically explained that the School Zone law is one of those rules they're only going to throw on to add to the charges list. If I go and shoot up the school, yeah, they're going to add Carrying a gun in a school zone. But walking my dog with a CCW down MY STREET is not going to get me carted off to The Big House.

    (Not yet anyways...we'll have to see with the newly improved PA crap.)

    Also, the local cops have to 'escalate' the issue to the Feds for the school zone stuff...not many locals want the FBI/ATF coming in unless they really need them. IE, they're not going to call the feds simply because a CCW'er was in a school zone.
     
  23. org

    org Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    153
    Interesting. The reason I mention this is that until a couple of years ago, CCW was permitted on school property in CO, not withstanding the "1000 feet rule". It was specifically forbidden when the law was changed to "shall issue". Until that time, even though we had "may issue" most sheriffs issued as a matter of course and we had almost no restrictions on where we could carry. The change was a sop to the hand wringers to get the shall issue through. Even though we lost school carry, we still have fewer restrictions than almost any of the other states.
     
  24. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    Yo!!! Yankee!!!

    You back from church yet???
    What you talking about, Willis??
    Inquiring minds want to know!!
     
  25. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Abusing the law is one of the few things government consistently does well.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page