Unscientific comparison of 38 Special loads.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SaxonPig

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
4,787
We still get many posts asking about the effectiveness of +P 38 Special loads. I consider the +P to be rather weak on power, not loaded to anywhere near the potential of the cartridge despite all the misguided impressions out there that this is a powerful load.

I wanted to compare factory +P to my own hand-loads so I tried a totally unscientific but interesting experiment. Maybe we should call it “The Bottles of truth?”

Using 2 liter plastic bottles (Diet Coke, my favorite) filled with water, I fired into 4 such bottles lined up in a row (see photo #1).


standard.gif


The revolver was a 2” S&W Model 10. I wanted the short barrel because this is what is usually used for defensive carry.

The Remington 125 +P (925 FPS from a 4” revolver) punched a clean hole into bottle #1, and tore a gaping hole out the back of said bottle. The second bottle showed evidence of being punctured by an expanded bullet going in and a small fragment coming out. This is odd because if the bullet came apart then we would expect the main portion to remain in the bottle but it wasn’t there. No part of the bullet was found. This fragment pierced bottle #3 in and out but apparently bounced off #4 without doing damage.

I wanted a recovered slug, so I fired a second round at fresh bottles. This time the bullet held together after punching into the third bottle and was found at the bottom. The bullet had obviously expanded in the first bottle with all entry and exit holes after the initial entry being big and torn rather than clean 38 caliber holes.

I then fired my own load (125 Remington Golden Sabre loaded to 1150 FPS). The effect was dramatic. The first bottle was not only penetrated, but the entry side (not the exit as might be expected) was split wide open all the way from the mouth to the base. A gaping exit indicated full expansion. This slug completely penetrated bottles 2 and 3, apparently bounced off #4 and was found on the ground below. The two bullets are shown in photos 2 and 3.


standard.gif

standard.gif


From this very limited and unscientific test it seems that the Golden Sabre expands perfectly (in water, anyway) and will hold together even in tough conditions. The +P bullet is more likely to fragment, and doesn’t expand as fully (perhaps due to the lower velocity). The dramatic explosive effect noted on bottle #1 with the hand-load is likely due to the higher velocity, proving that speed does matter. The hand-load also demonstrated slightly superior penetration through water.

IMO factory +P is a barely adequate self-defense load. I am much more comfortable with my 125@1150 load for carry purposes. In fact, I have a high level of confidence in the effectiveness of this load and in my mind THIS is what the +P should be, not that wimpy 925 load that makes the lawyers happy.
 
I'll keep this in mind the next time I am confronted by hostile soda bottles.:)

I'll add more seriously that my own impression of the Rem Golden Sabre 125 +P is that they produced horrible muzzle flash out of my 642. The Gold Dots SB were much better in that regard.
 
GS on the right.

I only used the Golden Sabre bullets, not loaded factory ammo. My loads produce no more flash than the factory +Ps although they are a tad louder.

Recoil increase is not even noticeable despite the over 200 FPS increase in velocity. I believe bullet weight has far more effect on felt recoil than does speed. I think Newton's Third Law would confirm this.

Yeah, I know, shooting water filled bottles is silly. So is shooting clay, gelatin or any other material. But people balk at shooting live targets for testing.
 
The Remmie GS isn't a bad load. I'm pretty sure the Speer God Dot 135+P passes it as do a few others, but it's not the useless junk that, say, the Hornady XTP is in all weights and flavors of 38/38+P.
 
I recently shot some Remington .38 ammo. Not +P. I noticed lots of muzzle flash from my 638. Don't know if that's a bad thing but its fun at the range :p

I understand that ripping a massive hole in the front and back of the target means something. But isn't there something to be said for the factory-made +P bullet that fragmented? Sounds like it dumped most of its energy in the first target and spread shrapnel. Which would be good for stopping someone, in my opinion. To bad it sounds like the second one whizzed right through.

Great post Saxonpig!
 
As the OP Said...

I'll keep this in mind the next time I am confronted by hostile soda bottles.
...'Unscientific comparison." While attempts have been made to correlate estimated inches of travel in water with penetration in calibrated ballistic gelatin, water is not a good tissue simulant. Water has a tendency to strip jackets from fast-moving JHP bullets so it stands to reason that the Golden Saber, with a tougher jacket than the usual copper alloy, will look better when fired into water jugs. As I recall, water will also produce more dramatic expansion so it's possible that testing in water may overestimate how much a bullet may expand in flesh out of a two-inch barrel.

Cor-Bon DPX loads and Speer short-barrel Gold Dot loads have scored well in testing from short-barrel revolvers. While the former were not specifically designed for use in short barrels, they seem to perform better than virtually all other hollowpoints when fired through four layers of denim, a consideration for those of us who carry in cold weather. (Yes, I live in Arizona, at 6,500 feet above sea level, and it snows here in the winter.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top