Thanks, that clears things up.If you want a 6", your only choice is a M17.
The M18 is built on the same mid-size K-frame, but has a ribbed and tapered 4" barrel with combat sights. The M17 was (almost always) made with a 6" or 8" ribbed straight barrel and target front sight. Aside from the barrel, they are the same, although individual guns will vary on the options installed, including Target hammers, triggers, grips, and overtravel stops. These were available in any combination on both 17s and 18s. Both the 17 and 18 pictured are "fully loaded" with these optional features.
The M34 is built on the smaller J-Frame, like the Chiefs Special, and never made with a barrel longer than 4", AFAIK.
All are excellent guns. The M17 can be thought of as the rimfire companion to the .38 M14 Target Masterpiece and the M18 as the .22 "trainer" version of the M15 Combat Masterpiece. The M34 was intended to be more of a plinker or "Kit Gun" that one would take camping or fishing.
That's a new one on me, neato!Smith did make a J frame 22LR with a 6”barrel, it’s a model 35. They are usually priced from $800-$1,200.
View attachment 1187125View attachment 1187128
Here one is with my other J frame 22’s.
View attachment 1187129
That's a new one on me, neato!
Even run-of-the-mill .22 Kit Guns are pushing a grand in clean condition these days.....
Well, there's another option for the OP, though I suspect it would take some solid hunting on GB. I've never seen one in the flesh at a shop or show, anyway. Heck, I'm not usually a J-Frame fan, but I wouldn't mind tracking down one of those.
Looks great to me.And if you want to step up to the .22 Mag, the model 48 (or 648) is also a fine choice. This no-dash 48 was a basket case that required major rehab when I got it, which unfortunately required a hard-chrome finish to make it presentable. Due to a previous owner's neglect it will never be perfect, but it's at least presentable now. Ron Mahovsky at Mahovsky Metalife did the plating.
View attachment 1187225
Thank you; it has some cosmetic imperfections but mechanically it's about as nice as you can ask for. For the price--even as terrible of condition it was in at the time--there was no way I could pass it up.Looks great to me.
M48's could be ordered with a second cylinder in .22LR, so you could shoot both. I think the cylinder from a M17 or M18 will interchange. I've only seen a couple of M48's that had both cylinders. I only have the magnum cylinder for my dash-4. They look just like the M17 and M18, you could get the M48 with a 4", 6" or 8-3/8" barrel. They have a very loud, high pitched bark.And if you want to step up to the .22 Mag, the model 48 (or 648) is also a fine choice.
Wouldn't surprise me if it left the factory that way. S&W never let any leftover parts go to waste, especially a perfectly good overrun of J-frames.There's a Model 35 on Guns International right now, but it looks suspect with this overstrike of the model number.
Without looking up the picture on Guns Int'l. myself, does that revolver have a 6" barrel? Model 34 and Model 35 are the same (both I frame), except the M34 is called the 22/32 Kit gun and has either a 2" or 4" barrel. The M35 is called the Model of 1953 22/32 Target and has a 6" barrel only. S&W never wasted anything, and probably took a M34 frame to make into a M35, so they overstamped it. Dash-1's started in 1960 on both models, the M34 was discontinued in 1991, the M35 was discontinued in 1973. For it to be an overstamped M34, that gun was made somewhere between 1960 and 1973.There's a Model 35 on Guns International right now, but it looks suspect with this overstrike of the model number.