VPC Parody Blog

Status
Not open for further replies.

jbkebert

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2009
Messages
2,599
Location
Kansas
http://vpcblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/elmer-keith-is-a-cop-killer/


Elmer Keith is a Cop-Killer
Posted by vpcadmin on February 27, 2008

The Gun Blobbers put the inventors and engineers of these death machines on a pedestal. They hold Samuel Colt, John Browning, and Eugene Stoner in high regard. In a continuing series, the VPC Blog will examine each of these death makers in turn.

Elmer Keith was a boisterous cowboy and inventor of several deadly types of ammunition. He first invented the .357 Magnum at the request of police officers. The .357 Magnum could penetrate the primitive armor vests worn at the time. This obviously means he wanted to kill cops. The .357 Magnum went on to become one of the most common, and therefore deadly, firearms cartridges around.

Later, Elmer Keith created the .44 Magnum cartridge, an even more deadly form of his .357 Magnum. It went on to star in a series of Dirty Harry films, and kill numerous police officers on the streets.

Keith’s attempts at killing cops inspired many other devious gun makers. One group created the .454 Casull in 1959. This bullet moves so fast that it can penetrate a Kevlar vest. Another group of police “officers” invented a brass bullet to penetrate car windows, yet it could also penetrate Kevlar vests!

I came across this while looking up info on Elmer Keith. Apparently he invented the .357 mag at the request of police (true) but his intentions was to kill cops??????:rolleyes:. You just have to love morons
 
Last edited:
ok...so....you invent something at the REQUEST of police...and because it can penetrate body armor...it means that, even if that was a condition it had to meet to be accepted by them, then it's meant to kill THEM?

Lovely logic there.....
 
Rofl....this sites a parody...

I just read another article, it isn't a real site...should've known it from that article, but was willing to believe.

"Here are percentages of weapons and other contraband that come from the U.S.:

90% of all grenades
90% of all rocket launchers
90% of all artillery pieces
Bizarrely, 90% of all drugs come from the U.S. as well.
90% of assault weapons (remember, that’s the even more deadly semi-automatic version; not the just-plain-deadly full-auto version)
90% of all Rickrolls "

Under ".223 Caliber Terror"

Some of it's pretty dang funny too...

" The range of a .30 caliber sniper rifle is 1,000 meters; ten times what a deer hunter needs. Some can even reach out to 1,500 meters; twenty times what a deer hunter needs. What legitimate, AHSA-approved hunter needs to shoot 1,000 yards? None, that’s who."

"How many innocent German tanks were destroyed by this deadly anti-armor weapon? We'll never know."
 
That site is kinda funny. They should start another page on their site on the dangers of sports cars and alcohol. We should ban them because sports cars are only good for running from the cops like Nicolas Cage did in Gone In 60 Seconds. Alcohol is only used by people who then DUI and beat their wives. Oh, we should ban diesel fuel and fertilizer also, they're only used for making bombs that blow up federal buildings. Oh, and airplanes; they're only used for crashing into buildings.

I could go on all day ...
 
I'm actually surprised the VPC hasn't sued them yet for using vpcblog as part of their URL; groups like the VPC can get quite pissy about things like that.

On a sidenote, the first time I ever saw the VPC's website was when I clicked on a link to their page on "bullet hoses" from vpcblog.wordpress.com. I seriously thought the VPC's page was satire, until I got done reading it and hit the Home page button.

It still amuses and at the same time saddens me that people pay any attention to the VPC or the Brady bunch. Speaking as someone who has fired machine guns of the 5.56, 7.62, and 50 BMG calibers, fired a 5.56 assault rifle on auto, and also owns a battle rifle; caliber matters! The VPC speaks about barrel shrouds, pistol grips, flash suppressors, etc. and claims that such features somehow help reduce recoil :confused: It's clear that these people have zero experience with firearms; makes you wonder if they've ever even held one.

I still hold the best way to make an anti into a shooter is to let em empty a few mags from a 22LR AR into a target.
 
Wow, it is hard to tell, but my vote is for satire. I see a comment there by crebralfix, one of our members, from Feb. '08. I wonder why he didn't tell us he was "anti"!!! lol
 
LOL, hilarious parody site, I love it.

However, I give it a week before some wingnut is screaming about this at a town hall on fox news thinking its real
 
"This obviously means he wanted to kill cops."

You've gotta love completely unsupported assertions like this.
 
Chris, go back and read my 2nd reply, or look around the site, it's not meant to make sense, its a parody site.

I seriously love this one personally:

"The Polish invented a deadly, anti-tank .30 caliber rifle. It could punch through over half an inch of armor at 300 meters. Clearly, it has the range and power to down an airplane.

at_rifle_wz35.jpg
{image text:How many innocent German tanks were destroyed by this deadly anti-armor weapon? We'll never know.}"
 
Chris, go back and read my 2nd reply, or look around the site, it's not meant to make sense, its a parody site.

I seriously love this one personally:

"The Polish invented a deadly, anti-tank .30 caliber rifle. It could punch through over half an inch of armor at 300 meters. Clearly, it has the range and power to down an airplane.
at_rifle_wz35.jpg
How many innocent German tanks were destroyed by this deadly anti-armor weapon? We'll never know."

I will tell you that this is a rifle that you won't want to fire twice, so you better make the first one count!

(It's also the last rifle that I ever fired from a reclining position. OUCH! Pushed me back about a foot. That muzzle brake don't work for beans.)
 
I hope it is intended to be a PARODY. On the other hand I have seen some real stupid crap come out of their mouths. Some of the stuff ranks right up there with the wisdom of the Kennedy's and the Bradey's:evil:
 
I saw "VPC" in the title and thought they were loony enough to actually write something. It being a parody makes it...well, funny. Not funny, in the fact that not everyone recognized it as a parody.
 
I hereby invoke Poe's Law:

"Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."

In other words, No matter how bizzare, outrageous, or just plain idiotic a parody of a Fundamentalist may seem, there will always be someone who cannot tell that it is a parody, having seen similar REAL ideas from real religious/political Fundamentalists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top