'What's a Few Dead Cops to the Gun Lobby?'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
134
Location
Islamorada,Florida
Fred Grimm is a talentless local writer.But even for him this was his worst day ever.Note the online comments following the column.

What's a few dead cops to the gun lobby?
Posted on Thu, Jun. 05, 2008
BY FRED GRIMM
[email protected]

The shock was in the weight of the thing. Less than six pounds.

It was a cop's weapon, a semiautomatic assault rifle of dull anodized black steel, stripped down to an unadorned functionality.

How light it felt in my hands. Like a toy gun.

I thought how easy it would be for some kid, some 110-pound wild-dog street punk, to heft an AR-6520 and wield it to hellish effect.

No wonder Fort Lauderdale is spending $82,000 for guns designed to kill enemy soldiers. Police know that since the expiration of the federal assault weapon ban, young criminals have ginned up the arms race.

Gun peddlers visit gun stores and shows where they make legal purchases of semiautomatic military assault guns powerful enough to penetrate walls, doors, cars -- powerful enough to render a police officer's bulletproof vest obsolete.

They flip them. Sell them out of car trunks at twice the price to gangbangers, drug dealers and armed robbers who want to upgrade to cop killers. Sell them to felons. Sell them to kids. Sell them to certifiably crazy people as long as crazy people can ante up a cold three grand.

PRO-GUN CONGRESS

Last year, the feds indicted four gun merchants on charges they had purchased more than 150 assault weapons and accessories, including a 90-round clip, and resold them in northwest Miami-Dade's toughest neighborhoods.

Chew on that: A young aspiring criminal no longer thinks his 9mm automatic pistol packs enough death. He's willing to pay street prices for an AK-47 with a 90-round clip.

The Fort Lauderdale police department held a news conference Wednesday to talk about the purchase of 100 Colt AR-6520 rifles. The city's cops were authorized semiautomatic weapons back in 2001 but it was up to individual patrolmen to buy their own. A lot has changed since 2001.

In 2004, Congress allowed the ban on assault weapons to expire. The federal law suffered major loopholes, but it still had the effect of tamping down the firepower cops faced on the streets. Since the ban was jettisoned, police groups like the International Association of Chiefs of Police have lamented that the bad guys have the cops outgunned.

NEW REALITY

Nationwide, even as police departments beg Congress to reinstate the assault weapon ban, they're reluctantly dealing with the new reality. Last month, Washington D.C., announced that city patrol cars would be equipped with AR-15 assault rifles, following cities like Miami, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, even Waterloo, Iowa.

The danger has become painfully obvious to any department in the vicinity of Miami-Dade County. Two officers have been murdered in the past nine months by gunmen carrying variations of the AK-47. In September, Miami-Dade officer Jose Somohano was killed and two other officers wounded. In February, Miami Detective James Walker was murdered as he sat in his car.

Fort Lauderdale cops see the increase in firearm savagery a few miles south. They understand the new reality.

Congress demonstrated in 2004 how much value was placed on the mythical right of private citizens to own semiautomatic military assault rifles.

How much? More than a few dead cops.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/columnists/fred_grimm/story/558637.html
 
Was this in today's Herald? I haven't read it yet.

I'm really getting sick of Fred Grimm and Ana Menendez. Frankly, all of the columnists are horrible, but they seem to be the worst. The two of them have been pushing anti messages through the paper at an increasing pace lately.

debating whether or not I want to write a letter.
 
Is he one those media buffons who believe that ARs were illegal before 2004???

Memo to Media: before your beloved ban expired ARs were sold. They looked differently but they were exactly the same function and "power" (*snicker* a .223 a "powerful") as the Colt #6520.

Time to write letters down there.
 
The cops would probably have an easier time without the mythical right to free speech and assembly. Then they could round up the rabble before the rocks started flying.

Those mythical restrictions on search and seizure are a real problem for law enforcement, too. If a cop has a hunch that someone might be up to something bad, why can't he just search their house? How many drug dealers are getting away with hurting our children because there's no real probable cause to search?

And the mythical right to due process is killing people. If we have to prove someone is guilty rather than just locking him up, he is free to rob, rape and kill more people.

The mythical right to avoid self-incrimination is a serious problem for law enforcement. If you can't beat a confession out of someone, you have to gather evidence. This takes time, and while some cops are tied up gathering evidence, their fellow cops can be killed in the streets, with no backup.

The mythical protection from double jeopardy is a real problem. That means that the cops just have one chance to gather that evidence. Everyone screws up or needs a little more time. Maybe the cops are home with the flu or something. This means criminals can go free, when all we really had to do is keep trying them until we could muster up a guilty verdict. But the mythical 5th Amendment keeps us from doing that.

And don't even get me started on the mythical Right to Counsel. Everyone knows that lawyers are scum and all they do is get child-rapers off scott-free so the lawyers can get rich and drive Porsches. Why does some kiddie-rapist get to have a lawyer? What a waste of time for the cops.

The mythical right to confront the witnesses against you is another cop-killer. Sometimes, witnesses won't even come forward. Why should they have to? Some notes describing what they said are good enough. The mythical right to a speedy, public trial just compounds the problem.

Finally, we have the mythical right to equal protection under the law. What a load of crap that is. It kills cops.

I'll bet that a lot of the well-armed perps are non-white. Back in the good old days, south of the Mason-Dixon line especially, that would have meant that they were kept in a certain part of town. If they left that part of town, they were fair game. The cops could shoot them, because obviously they were only there to rob and murder the white folk. If they stayed in that part of town, either they just murdered each other, and the cops didn't have to get involved, or if the cops did get involved, they could just shoot a bunch of people who seemed guilty and nobody who voted would be breathing down the City Council's necks about it.

Too bad there are all these mythical rights. Every one of them just means more dead cops.

---- Sarcasm is all that can express just how DISGUSTING the above article is, to me ---
 
Is he one those media buffons who believe that ARs were illegal before 2004???

Yes.And Fred is almost illiterate.And yet, somehow, he's held his job at the Miami Herald for over 20 years writing possibly the most amateurish local column in America.
He must hold some big chips on some Herald executives.
This deplorable column is an example of what he is able to get away with at the Herald.
 
The commentors at the end of the article are remarkably high road, especially when they have to deal with such a clown like that.

He thinks he's such a good writer? Oh wow! Let's compare him to Charles Frazier. But then, he doesn't even deserve to look at Mr. Frazier, not to mention even talking to him.
 
The good news is, traditional left-wing print journalism is DYING. Subscriptions are way down, advertising income collapsing and they are PO'd because their formerly captive audience now has other sources of information on the net. Don't do these jokers favors by linking to their sites or posting comments. Just let them fade away along with the leftist rags that pay them.
 
Can't explain how disgusting I find this man, not because of his political opinions, but because of his complete lack of morals and ethical treatment of his job and responsibility.

He's making a living lying and deceiving. Period.
 
Wow! That's really sad. His poor mind. It must be lonely and dark in there.

-Mark.
 
No matter how you spin it, .223 is a weak round (double entendre). Morons like this are responsible for the demonization of "assault weapons" and should be dropped from their magazines for reporting false claims. There's obviously no such thing as journalistic integrity anymore or these idiots would at least do research for ten minutes. I could search ".223" on Google Images right now, see a comparison of it next to a .300 Win Mag hunting round, and know it's puny. He couldn't do that?
 
Shhhhh! Don't give the leftist extremists ideas!

They are already doing that.

No matter how you spin it, .223 is a weak round (double entendre). Morons like this are responsible for the demonization of "assault weapons" and should be dropped from their magazines for reporting false claims. There's obviously no such thing as journalistic integrity anymore or these idiots would at least do research for ten minutes. I could search ".223" on Google Images right now, see a comparison of it next to a .300 Win Mag hunting round, and know it's puny. He couldn't do that?

It's really not a matter of calibers or cartridge strength in this issue. It's more of the fact that this extremist hates firearms, from a puny airgun to the Barrett .50 cal. And if there is a way to demonize guns, they will, and journalistic integrity means absolutely nothing to them. The Internet is the new source for real news. The old tube is getting old, and we have already started to become wary of it's uncanning abilities to deceive.
 
Last month, Washington D.C., announced that city patrol cars would be equipped with AR-15 assault rifles, following cities like Miami, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, even Waterloo, Iowa.


That's strange, because Mpls. doesn't have them yet. The SWAT guy's have some, but their just now starting to get them.
 
I'll tell you what we really need, we need laws against shooting cops.

I can't BELIEVE there is not already a law against that in Florida.......


The federal law suffered major loopholes, but it still had the effect of tamping down the firepower cops faced on the streets.

That is the funniest one. AFTER the Clinton AWB went into effect I saw more AR's for sale in different variants than I ever saw BEFORE the ban.

Once they were banned sales went through the roof. All that whole ban, and the expiration thereof, did was to increase demand for the things.
 
We better get use to it. The left wing is looking to take both Houses as well as the White House. If that happens there will be more and more of these articles. Not only on the 2A but all of them. One by one we will lose everything.
 
Oh my that hurt my head. Especially the comment by quizzical44...
But here's my question: in your doomsday scenario, who comes for your guns? The government? As who, the military? How many soldiers do you think would follow that order? How many *cops* do you think would be ok with a wide sweep of gun-owners? Do you not imagine law-enforcement to be sympathetic to your cause? Politicians, no. But the people on the ground who carry guns for work and know the dangers in the world? I don't think they're going to obey the orders that you imagine would happen.

Hello? K A T R I N A ? Idiots. :cuss:
 
(To Fred)
"I'd give you a clue, but it's obvious that you're not trying to do anything progressive."

More like,

To Fred:

I'm trying to see things from your point of view, but I can't physically get my head that far up my behind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top