Wal*Mart being sued: Ammo to mental deficient?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish that Wal Mart with the lawyers that they are sure to have on retainer, would fight this law suit until those that are sueing die of old age.. BUT, they will most likely pay to make it "go away". If this guys mental condition was such a problem for him and his family, I wish a judge would/could ask his family where the hell they were for him, before there were $$$ signs involved.
Scum bags!!
Be safe.
 
I feel as all of us here obviously do, that these lawers who keep bringing these frivolous lawsuits should be sued themselves by the people they are trying to sue in said frivilous lawsuits!
I was having some of the same thoughts. I've never been sued, but I read something years ago that I plan to follow if it ever happens. The writer suggested that if as soon as a defendant was found not liable, they countersued for malicious prosecution, a lot of the attraction might go out of filing frivilous lawsuits. I've never heard of it happening, but I think it ought to be tried more often.

I know there will be arguments about how the tort barracudas "stand up for the little guy," but some of those shysters need to think before they file, and stop listening for the sound of distant cash registers. I mean, they have to know that if Wal-Mart complied with the law and could not possibly have known that the buyer was unstable, then there's no "duty of care" and so no "breach" of that duty.
Those lawyers should just go find a case with some merit to it.
 
To me this seems plain and simple like people looking for money. Odds are they will get 5 grand from walmart to shut up and go away as legal fees would be higher.
 
I was thinking today that most people here though the VT shooter's rounds looked like WWB stuff. Wasn't a certain fluffly filmmaker partially responsible for exploiting the columbine shooting to get k-mart to stop selling handgun ammo? If cho bought his ammo at walmart and similiar results were had I think alot of shooters would suffer a loss of cheap ammo.
 
I wonder if Wallyworld will grow some cajonies or cave??

One thing about Wal-Mart, they know if they cave to a frivolous suit the ambulance chasers will be lined up at the courthouse door quicker than you can say "Tort!" They have a tendency to fight suits like this tooth and nail because they know everyone wants a piece of their pie. I predict this one will be dropped when the plaintiffs realize just how seriously Wal-Mart takes any lawsuit. Think I'm joking? Notice all the little smoked plexiglass spheres hanging from the ceiling next time you go into a Wally World. They're not there to prevent shop lifting, they're there to catch would be scam artists trying to claim damages from purported injuries. I know some of the guys in their "loss prevention" department, and lawsuits are the loss they're most interested in preventing.

Bad mistake if you think the corporate lawyers at Wally World will cave on anything.
 
As soon as theres blood in the water the sharks arrive ... They are dressed in pin striped suits ,wear wing tipped shoes .Charge $150.00 an hour , even charge you if you iniate the phone call .and are sometimes elected as judges ....So dont be suprised .
 
Is this just more Walmart bashing? Is the a true story? Is there a link?

I could go into any store and buy ammo. I can't buy a gun. there is NO check for ammo anywhere I have been.
BS meter is Pegged.
 
EDIT - Found it! freenewmexican.com

LAS CRUCES, N.M. (AP) _ A lawsuit alleges Wal-Mart sold ammunition to an unstable man accused of fatally shooting another man six hours later in Las Cruces.

Kenneth Rauch, 49, of Las Cruces has been accused of killing Eusebio Escobedo, 27, of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on April 25, 2005.

Charges against Rauch include first-degree murder and attempted murder. He is being held at the Las Vegas Medical Center. No trial date has been set.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in state district court, lists the plaintiffs as Escobedo's children, fiancee and estranged wife.

The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges Rauch was under the influence of alcohol and mentally disturbed when he bought shotgun shells at a Wal-Mart in Las Cruces.

Wal-Mart has a policy governing the sale of firearms, including background checks and determining if prospective customers are under the influence, said Ken Egan of Las Cruces, the plaintiffs' attorney.

But when Rauch bought the shotgun shells, there was no such policy governing the sale of ammunition. The lawsuit alleges Wal-Mart employees sold the ammunition to an unstable man, asking few, if any, questions.

John Simley, a spokesman for Wal-Mart, said the company had not seen the complaint.

"We don't know what the complaint says. As a result, we can't comment on something we haven't seen," he said Wednesday in a telephone call from Bentonville, Ark.

Escobedo, his fiancee and her 3-year-old son had stopped at a Las Cruces gasoline station when a a man fired a gunshot into the hood of their car, police have said.

The man then walked to the driver's side window and shot into the car, hitting Escobedo, who had thrown himself across his fiancee as she sat in the passenger's seat, authorities said.
 
Last edited:
I don't expect the lawsuit to go anywhere. Walmart's actions are held up against what the stadard is in the industry, and the industry standard is not to check. Unless the entire industry's practice of not doing a mental health check before selling ammo is found to be negligent, don't expect to see anything from this.

I was having some of the same thoughts. I've never been sued, but I read something years ago that I plan to follow if it ever happens. The writer suggested that if as soon as a defendant was found not liable, they countersued for malicious prosecution, a lot of the attraction might go out of filing frivilous lawsuits. I've never heard of it happening, but I think it ought to be tried more often.

Counter-suits are actually pretty common. You don't hear about them because they rarely go anywhere.
 
I'm suing my mother's obstetrician because I'm not taller and better looking than I am
You were a beautiful baby. Did your mom ever figure out who your father was:)
 
I would imagine Walmart will be able to win this one, and I hope that's the case. Walmart is by far the number 1 customer of Remington (and possibly some of the other companies. If Walmart were to stop selling ammo (and in turn, guns) it would really hurt the gun industry.
 
If Walmart were to stop selling ammo (and in turn, guns) it would really hurt the gun industry.
I don't think so. Walmart buys these products to resell them. If Walmart doesn't stock them any longer, most people will buy the products at other retailers for a bit more money and the manufacturers will likely make a bit more profit per unit sold to offset any reduction in sales.
 
If Walmart were to stop selling ammo (and in turn, guns) it would really hurt the gun industry.

Of course. But many gun owners would be happy to support their local mom and pop stores by paying much higher prices for ammunition.

Then we can help put supermarkets out of business so we can support our local mom and pop stores by paying higher prices for food too, and go on to get rid of all chains so we can support our local mom and pop stores by paying higher prices for everything.

No gun owner buys anything on the Internet either. We're patriotic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top