Wallpaper illustrating volumes of various noises

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oleg Volk

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,155
Location
Nashville, TN
noisevolume2.jpg
1024x1280 wallpaper

Hopefully, this would provide an unobtrusive way to show that muffling cars or firearms does not silence them but does reduce hearing damage and noise pollution. No guns are shown, so this graphic should be safe to put up on work computers.
 
Interesting.

I like the idea of showing the numbers in relation to spheres.

It gives an intuitive, visual understanding of just how sound measurements work.
 
Very cool chart!

I'm so used to hearing the misnomer silenced that I assumed muffled meant "I have hearing protection on." Your explanation below the poster made me understand my mistake. Would it make any sense to replace muffled with "silenced" (in quotes)?
 
Changed to "silenced".

Took me a long time to figure out how to show huge differences in volume...decided to use visual volumes for that.
 
Cool! Now I get it :)

You didn't like the quotes around "silenced?" I can see how the quotes would give too much of an edge to what is meant to be an office poster.

I like the spheres. I like the "1,000,000x" notations.
 
Very nice Oleg. What's your reference for the numbers? It is valuable to cite the source of the data when you're providing a representation of the data. I might be able to get this published for you in one of the technical journals as a note.
 
I'll post the sources when I get home (one was Wikipedia, the other some society for hearing protection).
 
I like this poster. What a great way to illustrate the value of "sileneced" guns for those that say the hold no viable purpose. I would agree with the suggestion to use diiffernt colors to represent the "danger zone". I would start with something like green and have it merge into yellow as it approaches the pain threshold and then red at and above the thresold of pain.
 
My best recollection is that every 3 dB gain doubles the power and every 3 dB loss halves it. So the difference between 90 dB and 93 dB is a two-fold increase. The difference between 90 dB and 96 db is twice 90 and then twice again as much.
 
What a great way to illustrate the value of "sileneced" guns for those that say the hold no viable purpose.

Instead of "silenced" how about "suppressed"? After all, silencers are only used by Mafia hitmen to keep their revolvers quiet while they murder someone. :D

A suppressor, however, is a tool that reduces a firearms noise level. I like the British "Sound Moderator" even better. "Moderated Firearm" might even inspire conversation.
 
http://www.safetyline.wa.gov.au/institute/level2/course18/lecture53/index.asp



The human ear responds to sounds over a very large range of sound intensities:

* the sound intensity of the threshold of hearing (the quietest sound we can hear) is 0.00000000001 watts/m2 (often written 10-12 watts/m2 );

* whilst the sound intensity at the threshold of pain is about 10 watts/m².

DECIBEL SCALE IS USED TO COVER THE RANGE OF SOUND INTENSITIES

To handle this large range we make use of a logarithmic ratio scale called the decibel scale.

In general, a decibel scale for any quantity, q, is defined as:

Lq = 10 log dB (Equation 2.1)

Note that the decibel is not an absolute measure but is referenced to a selected quantity, q ref.

Another reason for using this scale is that the ear itself 'hears' logarithmically and humans judge the relative loudness of two sounds by the ratio of their intensities, a logarithmic behaviour.

The Bel was named after Alexander Graham Bell (1847-1922), the Scottish/American inventor of the telephone and worker for the deaf.

As this unit is rather large it has been divided into ten smaller units called decibels or dB. (deci = one tenth of).

Click here if you want to leave the SafetyLine Institute to take a brief tutorial refresher on logarithms at the University of Wisconsin.

When sound intensity is expressed as a decibel it is referred to as sound intensity level and is given the symbol LI.

To convert sound intensity, I, to sound intensity level LI the following relationship is used:

LI = 10 log dB re Iref (Equation 2.2)

where I = sound intensity whose level is being specified, in watts/m2

and Iref = reference intensity

= 10-12 watts/m2 (the threshold of hearing)

Sound power, W, can also be expressed in decibels and is then referred to as the sound power level, Lw.

Lw = 10 log dB re Wref (Equation 2.3)

where W = sound power of the source in watts

Wref = reference sound power

= 10-12 watts

For sound pressure p, we use the relationship:

Sound pressure level Lp = 10 log = 20 log dB re pref (Equation 2.4)

where p = rms sound pressure in Pa

pref = 2 x 10-5 Pa

(sometimes written as 20 m Pa = 20 x 10-6 Pa, which is the sound pressure at the threshold of hearing at 1000 Hz)

The sound pressure level at the threshold of hearing is thus:

Lp = 20 log = 20 log 1 = 0 dB
 
The more I look at this, the more I suspect that the volumes of the balls are correct, e.g., the 10x ball is actually 10 times the volume of the 1x ball. Am I right?
 
The more I look at this, the more I suspect that the volumes of the balls are correct, e.g., the 10x ball is actually 10 times the volume of the 1x ball. Am I right?

Nope. :)

It appears that the volume of the spheres is logarithmically increasing. For example, the ratio of the volume of the "tornado" sphere to the volume of the "threshold of pain" sphere is very close to 4.0, although the text indicates the former is 10,000 times louder than the latter. Not so coincidentally, 4.0 = log_10(10,000).

We deal with at least 3 problems when we try to use spheres to represent dB:

1) dB are unitless; spheres are not
2) dB express ratios (via logarithms); spheres normally do not
3) Difficulty discussing the problem, since in the case of dB 'volume' refers to the intensity of sounds, whereas in spheres 'volume' is a 3D spatial measurement. :D

In the example I gave, the larger sphere was 4 times larger than the smaller sphere (volumetrically speaking), which is intended to convey a four orders of magnitude increase in audible volume. Not exactly intuitive, eh?

I can see the trouble Oleg must have had in coming up with this graphic!
 
Oleg, you know I love your work. I do. But this one has to be the best.

I won't pretend to understand it, but the apparent simplicity masking an underlying complexity is breathtaking.

Thanks, and rest assured that I will use this wall paper to educate folks whenever I get the opportunity.
 
The spheres were not calculated to be the right size. To show the true difference in magnitude, I'd need to come up with a better idea. I simply wanted to convey ranking, to explain that a "silenced" shot isn't very quiet at all and that an unsuppressed report is painful. I also wanted it to be so neutral to the layman's eye that it would find its way into physics classrooms.
 
The spheres were not calculated to be the right size.

Then it's a stunning coincidence that the 2 spheres I arbitrarily chose (tornado, pain threshold) differ in volume by a factor of 4, and sound intensity by 4 orders of magnitude! I measured the radii of those spheres in MS paint and figured out the volumes that way. Truly strange. :)
 
Nice, Oleg, but are you sure about that muffled car value?

What jumps out at me is that a vacuum cleaner is listed at 70, and a muffled car at 90?

I don't know about everybody else, but I think that my cars are quieter than any of my vacuums...

Anywho, my $0.02...

Sawdust
 
Ditto on the car with muffler number.

I can stand nect to my car and NOT HEAR it.

Maybe they mean a performance muffler? Flowmaster, etc?
 
dBa measures sound intensity. Loudness, you perception of how loud a sound is, is not just determined by the dBa. Frequency and duration also matter. Vacuum cleaners are relatively high frequency; cars are relatively low.
 
I like it, a lot.

As I see it, the idea is to demonstrate why hearing protection is important.

If the size of the spheres accurately represented the differences between the various sound levels, the tornado one would be roughly the size of a 45 ft diameter ball. It doesn't need to be; the graphic gets the message across.
 
Last edited:
i.e., the graphic works fine if you don't try to analyze it very closely. Which probably 95% of all people would not, so I think it gets the point across very well to the intended audience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top