Walter E. Williams hits another home run...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Poper

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
2,834
Location
Semi-Free State of Arizona
After a brief serch, I could find no thread regarding this column. If I failed and inadvertantly initiated a duplicate, I apologize. MODs, please punish me appropriately. :):D:evil: :uhoh:

I am a great fan of Dr. Walter E. Williams. A brilliant economist, he is also an astute observer of the Human Condition.
His May 21, 2008 column entitled "Control Criminals Not Guns" is another excellent musing about the failings of our current policy of Crime and Non-Punishment.

http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/08/ControlCriminalsNotGuns.htm

If there is one clear basic function of government, it's to protect citizens from criminals. When government failure becomes so apparent, as it is in the murder of a police officer, officials seek scapegoats and very often it's the National Rifle Association and others who seek to protect our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. We hear calls for stricter gun control laws when what is really needed is more control over criminals.
(Emphasis mine.)

An extraordinary clear thinker, Dr. Williams gives a fresh, honest insight into a serious issue/problem. If only the policy wonks will read, understand and act!

I sincerely love this guy!

My 2 cents, for your perusal.

Poper
 
You go, Mr. Williams!:D

That statement completely drives the ball right out of the stadium. Talking about home runs.
 
Dr. Williams is one of the brightest men in the country. I wish he were President, but he is too honorable a man to participate in politics.
 
The only problem I can see with Dr Williams ever being elected to anything is that he's way too intelligent for the vast majority of people who think that the purpose of government is to provide for most of their whims and desires. Oh, and to take care of them when they mess up.
 
Copy it an mail to your elected representatives

We should share this article with those who do make the laws. Who knows, one or two of them might learn something.
John
Charlotte, NC
 
We should share this article with those who do make the laws. Who knows, one or two of them might learn something.
Good idea, John!
I'm going to print it and send it via snail mail (with a letter of interest) and hope some of the staffers read it, too!
:D :scrutiny:

Poper
 
A MINORITY VIEW

BY WALTER E. WILLIAMS

RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 2008, AND THEREAFTER



Control Criminals Not Guns



Every time there's a highly publicized shooting, out go the cries for stricter gun control laws, and it was no different with the recent murder of Philadelphia Police Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, in a letter to the state congressional delegation demanding reenactment of the federal assault weapon ban, said, "Passing this legislation will go a long way to protecting those who put their lives on the line every day for us. … There is no excuse to do otherwise."



Gun control laws will not protect us from murderers. We need protection from the criminal justice system politicians have created. Let's look at it.



According to former Philly cop Michael P. Tremoglie's article "Who freed the cop-killers?" for the Philadelphia Daily News (5/8/08), all three murder suspects had extensive criminal records. Levon Warner was sentenced in 1997 to seven and a half to 15 years for robbery, one to five years for possessing an instrument of crime and five to 10 for criminal conspiracy. Howard Cain was convicted in 1996 on four counts of robbery and sentenced to five to 10 years on each count. Eric Floyd was sentenced to five to 10 years in 1995 for robbery, rearrested in 1999 for parole violation and later convicted in 2001 for two robberies. If these criminals had not been released from prison, long before they served out their sentences, officer Liczbinski would be alive today. So what's responsible for his death: guns or a prison and parole system that released these three criminals? Tremoglie cites other examples of criminals, with convictions for violent crimes ranging from robbery and assault to murder, who were paroled and later murdered police officers.



A New York Times study (4/28/06) of the city's 1,662 murders in 2003-2005 found that 90 percent of the murderers had criminal records. A Massachusetts study reported that on average, homicide offenders had been arraigned for nine prior offenses. John Lott's book, "More Guns, Less Crime," reports that in 1988 in the 75 largest counties in the U.S., over 89 percent of adult murderers had a criminal record as an adult.



A few days after the murder of Liczbinski, Governor Rendell told a news conference, attended by state elected officials and top law enforcement officials, "The time has come for politicians to decide. You have to decide whether you're on their side -- the men and women who wear blue -- or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby." Instead of saying "whether you're on the side of the gun lobby," Rendell should have said "whether you're on the side of the criminal and the courts, prosecutors, prisons and parole boards that cut soft deals with criminals and release them to prey upon police officers and law-abiding citizens."



If there is one clear basic function of government, it's to protect citizens from criminals. When government failure becomes so apparent, as it is in the murder of a police officer, officials seek scapegoats and very often it's the National Rifle Association and others who seek to protect our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. We hear calls for stricter gun control laws when what is really needed is more control over criminals.



There are many third-party liability laws. I think they ought to be applied to members of parole boards who release criminals who turn around and commit violent crimes. As it stands now, people on parole boards who release criminals bear no cost of their decisions. I bet that if members of parole boards were held liable or forced to serve the balance of the sentence of a parolee who goes out and commits more crime, they would pay more attention to the welfare of the community rather than the welfare of a criminal. You say, "Williams, under those conditions, who'd serve on a parole board?" There's something to be said about that.



Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.



COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

His column used to appear in PORAC news.
 
No offense but I fail to see what is so "brilliant" about a fairly simple position which has been stated many times over, by other people.
 
No offense but I fail to see what is so "brilliant" about a fairly simple position which has been stated many times over, by other people.

It's only that to see something actually in print by a clear thinker is almost unheard of today. Remember what one guy said, "when times get bad the first duty is to clearly state the obvious," or something like that. ;)
 
macp said:
No offense but I fail to see what is so "brilliant" about a fairly simple position which has been stated many times over, by other people.
Please re-read my statement.
I am a great fan of Dr. Walter E. Williams. A brilliant economist, he is also an astute observer of the Human Condition.
Dr. Williams is highly respected and nationally recognized for his understanding of economics and his ability to communicate his vast knowledge to laymen and experts alike. When a man of his standing takes on such a controverial subject, (OUTSIDE of his expertise, mind you) and suscinctly exposes the nincompoop public policy makers for what they are, I have to admire him. It is much easier for him to say nothing on the subject. Obviously he is deeply bothered by by this.

Having such a high profile, well respected man write such an article is very refreshing IMHO.

Poper
 
We need protection from the criminal justice system politicians have created.
Wow!
This has been so obvious for so many years but noone will say it!

If only politicians would/could see what it is they have created!

Azidiot
 
Thank you for sharing this.
My favorite Walter Williams quote is this:

"If you see someone with Walter Williams' guns, you will know that Walter Williams is dead."
 
Dr. Williams is one of the brightest men in the country. I wish he were President, but he is too honorable a man to participate in politics.

A very true statement! He is exceptionally bright and honorable and as such it is unlikely that he would ever participate in politics. Further more he is also an HONEST and plain spoken man, so it is unlikely he would ever get elected! He would really say what it is that he would do, and further more actually do it! He would not be a very good politician!
 
TCB, a number of years ago, we had a man on talk radio here in Detroit by the name of Mark Scott. He often had Dr. WIlliams on his program, and I was fortunate enough to call in one morning to ask him a question.
My question to Dr. Williams was " Would you ever consider running for the Presidency?"

Dr. Williams response was" I refuse to surrender my principles."

He would have my vote in less than a heartbeat, if he was so inclined to run.
 
I honestly have the feeling that if he were white, people here wouldn't be gushing about how bright and "honorable" he is or that "I would vote for him" etc.

It's like the Chris Rock bit, where he remarks how whites love to keep mentioning how articulate Colin Powell is.
 
I honestly have the feeling that if he were white, people here wouldn't be gushing about how bright and "honorable" he is or that "I would vote for him" etc.
Skin color is irrelevant in Dr. Williams' case. It is the quality of the man that we admire. He gets props because he earns and deserves them.
 
macp said:
No offense but I fail to see what is so "brilliant" about a fairly simple position which has been stated many times over, by other people.
You are evidently new to THR. Walter E. has been a board favorite for a long, long time. He has consistently taken positions applauded by and large with THR's participants. Second, do yourself a favor and use THR's search function. You will see Walter E. in the middle of discussions for a long time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top