Mainsail
Member
Pulling a loaded gun out anywhere it is improper to do so is UNACCEPTABLE. Gun show or mall, it is UNACCEPTABLE and ILLEGAL. Prosecute the lawbreakers, do not infringe the rights of the law abiding.Besides, they’re very unlikely to be pulling out a gun to show it to someone in the mall, etc.
At a gun show where guns are being handled, displayed, played with and so on, it’s much more likely that a loaded gun is…
Don’t you understand that those are illegal actions under WA law?! If a visitor at the show displays/draws a firearm “…in a manner…that warrants alarm for the safety of others” they have committed an illegal act.
Again, this is an argument that Sara Brady herself would use. There is no problem sorting them out. You arrest and prosecute law breakers, you do NOT accomplish safety by restricting the civil rights of the law abiding.YES, SOME people can't be trusted! The problem is sorting out those that can from those that can't.
Fill in the blank:If you let everybody have a loaded gun, there is the chance of an AD/ND. If you let no one have one, there is no chance. (Other than those that decide they are better than the rules of the club or are too stupid to follow them.)
If you let everybody have a loaded gun, there is the chance of a murder
If you let everybody have a loaded gun, there is the chance of a suicide
If you let everybody have a loaded gun, there is the chance of domestic violence
Additionally, these two statements contradict each other. Even the solution guarantees absolutely nothing. I will also point out, again, that this is a Sara Brady argument.
Also, I’m still interested in your solution of having a “clearing” area if one decides they want to handle their carry gun for any reason. I asked if your plan was to “clear” the gun and then have it tied, or just clear it and leave it untied.
Sure, zip-tie the unloaded guns. All others are to be assumed loaded. Any vendor or WAC member that sees a firearm in someone’s hand that is not tied will immediately detain that person until the police arrive to take him/her into custody. ZERO tolerance. The police like to say that they’re the only ones responsible enough to carry firearms; you seem to say the same about yourself. You’re ok, but other may not be. The same can be said of other drivers, other boaters, or other pilots. Liberty is a frightening thing, no? It’s always the other guy and you seem to be OK that the ‘other guy’ is out there armed. Guns and stupid do not peacefully coexist.
I am STILL waiting to hear a reasoned argument that doesn’t use anti-gunner slogans and propaganda. I’m not trying to pin you to the wall with that demand either, but if your argument relies on those sorts of statements, then you are admitting that WAC is indeed in fellowship with the gun banners.
Last edited: