Weight that can be attached to accessory rail?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rexster

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
4,533
Location
SE Texas
While extra weight is not desirable in carry pistols, some target pistols have been equipped with add-on weight to adjust the pistols's balance. I am not (yet) into shooting such pistols, But I do have a problem, that might be mitigated a bit by more weight at the muzzle. My formerly stronger wrist is developing more than a touch of arthritis, transforming my P229R duty pistol into a torture device, with the snappy .40 recoil and the relatively high bore axis. An all-stainless steel version of the P229 would be a solution, though expensive, and the Stainless Elites will not fit the mandated duty holster, so I would have to pay someone to do some custom grinding.

One solution would be to insert some appropriately-sized pieces of lead into the battery compartment of a weapon-mounted light. My X200 is simply not heavy enough, with batteries in place, to make much difference.

Another solution would be a small rail riser or adapter, but the ones I have found are aluminum. I already have one made by GG&G, which is aluminum, and simply does not weigh enough to make a difference. Are there any small steel risers on the market I may have missed in my searching?

An extended and ported barrel is not a solution, as I must qual while using a
specified, mandated holster.

I can switch to a Glock or M&P40, the other authorized duty pistols, to get a lower bore axis, but the mandated standard duty cartridge is the snappy .40 S&W, regardless. Only the SWAT guys can carry other cartridges, and just about any pistol they want. Their armorer, with a similar affliction, switched to an all-steel 9mm duty pistol.

I can train on my own with my 9mm conversion barrel, and may purchase a .22 LR conversion upper unit. Thankfully, a P229R points, for me, like a K-frame
revolver, and the DA pulls are very similar, so I can do most of my practicing with my S&W Model 17, and rimfire ammo.

Have I forgotten anything?

I could appeal to the chief for an exception to the duty pistol rules, but one firearms trainer recommended I not do that, as I could find myself in front of a medical review board, tying to convince them not to "medically separate" me from the department. (forced retirement) i think I have a few more good years left in me; I am only 50.

Thanks for reading this far without falling asleep! :)
 
What about the compensator that was sold on the 229 Sport? I'm sure sigarms sells them
 
What about the compensator that was sold on the 229 Sport? I'm sure sigarms sells them
Thanks, but this has to work with a specified duty holster. A holster for the longer P226 is not an option, either, as the slides are dimensionally different. The version of our duty holster that is designed to work with flashlights dictates that anything I clamp to the rail cannot exceed the dimentions of the largest specified light, which I think is the M3. The slide and barrel butt up against a plug that seems to be integral to the structural integrity of the holster.

Thanks again, however, for your recommendation.
 
I've seen similar issues from USPSA shooters who used to shoot 50k+ rounds/year in practice. What has helped them is changing from shooting using the Weaver to the Isosceles grip geometry.

If you are looking at a platform change in .40, I'll offer that my experience has shown that the M&P40 seems to transmit less perceived recoil than the Glock. Prior to that, my smoothest shooting .40 has been the Beretta 96
 
I've seen similar issues from USPSA shooters who used to shoot 50k+ rounds/year in practice. What has helped them is changing from shooting using the Weaver to the Isosceles grip geometry.

If you are looking at a platform change in .40, I'll offer that my experience has shown that the M&P40 seems to transmit less perceived recoil than the Glock. Prior to that, my smoothest shooting .40 has been the Beretta 96
Thanks. I have used isosceles since it was drilled into my stubborn head during the academy days, when I found it indeed worked better for me. I have, also, adopted the modern support-hand technique as you have shown in your tutorial posts. Interestingly, using this modern support-hand technique means my right hand hurts when shooting lefty, too.

Switching pistols is certainly an option, and in fact I bought a G17 in anticipation of the chief authorizing 9mm as an alternative duty cartridge, but the latest change to our firearms policy, which seems to be a midsummer thing every year, was silent on that issue. I do plan to use an employee representative council system as a channel to let the
command staff know how I feel, but as they did just study and apparently reject the 9mm proposal, which was written-up in great detail by the firearms training unit, which usually wields great influence, it is not likely to get anywhere. Things move v-e-r-y slowly in such a huge organization.
 
Last edited:
One reason I hesitate to change platforms is that it usually takes several thousand rounds with a new platform before I feel truly confident in my ability to shoot it reflexively, with "no mind." I could probably develop this confidence with a Glock more quickly, as I used Glocks from 2002-2004, though my accuracy potential reached a disappointing plateau, prompting my switch to SIG DAK. I have continued to do well enough with Glock "sim" guns during training.

I would just about give my left, uh, kidney to be able to revert to a K-frame revolver in my duty belt rig! Actually, certain plainclothes personnel are still able use specified K/L-frames as primary duty pistols, and our back-up gun policy allows me to have a 4" revolver with me on patrol; I just cannot wear it in a visible manner.
 
Magoo, thanks for that link! Those may be too big, but if nothing else, it may be feasible to grind one down enough to be workable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top