Were you a gun owner during the 1994-2004 Assault Weapons Ban?

Were you a gun owner/shooter during the last "Assault Weapons Ban" (1994-2004)?

  • Yes. I owned/shot guns when this ban was initially signed into law.

    Votes: 249 70.9%
  • Yes, but this law was already in place when I began shooting.

    Votes: 45 12.8%
  • No. I started shooting after the ban expired in 2004.

    Votes: 51 14.5%
  • I wasn't aware of the last ban.

    Votes: 6 1.7%

  • Total voters
    351
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was a gun owner long before the AWB. I remember when Steyr AUGs went from about $600 to $3000 and H&K 91's did about the same. I remember seeing "pre-ban" Glock 17 and 19 "high capacity" magazines selling for $120 each during the ban years. I am fearful that we won't be able to avoid a return to those bad old days. This 20 year old maniac has given the antis the perfect club with which to pummel us. "For the children" will be the phrase the antis will use in their attempt to beat us into submission. This is what the antis have been waiting years for and they will do their utmost to take advantage of the opportunity. I fear this is America's Dunblane and/or Port Arthur massacres.
 
I was shooting long before the ban. I've never had much interest in hi-cap rifles, so the ban did nothing to alter my shooting habits at the time.
 
I was shooting long before the AWB, and at the time I didn't own an AR or AK. During the ban I bought a Bulgarian AK just for the heck of it. Thumbhole stock, milled receiver, it cost me under $300 if I remember right.

I sold it to buy a Dillon 550B press and assorted accessories. I actually made money on it when I sold it. First time for everything. LOL

I bought a Bushmaster in 2000, and it became an instant safe queen. I sold it a few years later and made out alright there too.

The ban ended in 2004, and I still didn't have a modern sporting rifle. Bought one in 2009, and this time I liked them.

Last time I heard, this feinstein creature is still talking about no retroactive bans. If that's true, what exactly does a ban accomplish? There are probably millions of ARs and AKs out there already. More feel good nonsense, just like the first one.
 
Guys, I go back to the GCA of 68, The days you could buy a gun with no paperwork.
I hated the awb, All it did was drive up prices. It did not stop a single crime.
We must fight all present proposals, no compromise, no surrender.
All you young guys get active,get involved.


I'm with "Bikerdoc" I was thirteen in '68, I had my own 12 ga single shot savage, (I still have it) I started shooting my dad's guns when I was 5 years old, and all gun control angers me, as it has been proven to NOT reduce crime, just freedoms.

I am wondering why is it, When we have a terrorist attack (9/11) we go after the terrorists, When it is just a nutjob with a stolen rifle, we need to go after the guns.:banghead::banghead:
 
Started shooting my Dad's guns in the 50s. Got my first rifle in 1962. I don't remember if there was an age limit or not but our local hardware store had single shot .22s for less than $20.00. You could mail order an M-1 Carbine or Garand and have it shipped to your front door.

Dan
 
I bought my Mini-14 in 1990 ~ the only one I had touched by the so-called ban. Being 'pre-ban' it sported (and sports) a flash hider. Mags were never a problen and, at long last in spite of 'Bill-a-longa-no-one-needsa-morea-than-10 rounds Ruger' ---it has 4 factory mags in its service. It's a low-miles mini with maybe 2k on the clock. I don't ask more of it than it can give and now---in odd twists of fate---I have to qualify with the fixed-stock k-mini for work every year (in fact just next week I do along with the 870 and S&W 64 sixgun). Not the most modern for threegun comps maybe, but pretty damn rugged.

And to the stable has been added Ak's 47 and 74; simple and rugged beyond measure. So I'l say it here first among friends: MOLON LABE
 
I was not into firearms yet at the time although I was over 21 during the AWB. So fortunately I was spared of all this hysteria and gun buying frenzy we have now.

Good thing I'm into bolt action rifles like Mosin's, and shotguns, and 22lr's for now. Most of them are unaffected by the AWB.
 
As said, the last ban didn't prevent any crime.

My fear is they try to regulate or tax the ammo next...

We need some regulation on people... Natural selection worked quite well, now the Darwin Awards are all we have to giggle about.
 
I was 17 when the 1994 ban passed. I became a gun owner during the worst time.

I remember paying $125 for a 13 round Glock 21 magazine.

I remember paying $2500 for an AR-15.

My gun collection in 2001 (age 24), looked like this:

rIUWB.jpg

Om7dk.jpg

1p00l.jpg

By 2003 I proved that "Firearms collections will grow to fill every slot in your gun cabinet / safe / etc"

Cac8U.jpg


The ONLY thing the Assault Weapons ban did was make it more expensive to collect guns.

I was NEVER "not able" to find something for sale that I wanted to buy.

Whether I was willing to pay the price of admission, was the only relevant question.
 
(Consider ALL of those weapons were purchased during the ban.. plus some that I don't show.)

Bans do NOTHING to end the supply of weapons.

It just makes it several times more costly to acquire them.
 
I would like to add one thing.

In a way, I miss the "good old days."

I bought guns in the parking lot of bars.

In the back of cash payday loan places, from loan sharks.

In dark alleys.

At gun shows.

In McDonald's parking lot.

There was no shortage of guns if you had the cash.

Buying an AR-15 at Wal Mart is kind of anti-climactic, you know. No "rush" from a good score, like the good old days!
 
I was 14 when the ban went into place. I enlisted in 98, and thats when I really got interested in guns, but being stationed in places like Japan, Germany, Turkey and California didn't help. I didn't buy my first gun until 2008 when I left the service.

The assault weapons ban didn't effect the Columbine shooters, either, who used home made explosives, 12 gauge shotguns and Hi Point carbines with 10 round magazines. No law can ever be put into place to thwart, circumvent or prevent violence by those who wish to commit it.
 
I was well past the age in 1994, I remember times when you placed an ad in the paper and the person came to your house and gave you cash; or you sold some at a garage sale with no thought they they were going to kill you or rob you go somewhere and commit crimes. 1994AWB had no effect on me - I had (and still have) what long guns I wanted, but it did make Glock mags more expensive for a while
 
I bought my first shotgun (12 ga) through the mail in 1963 from a Montgomery Ward catalog. You could also buy almost any WWII/Korea military firearm through the mail, including the M1 Garand or M1 carbine. Things changed just after Oswald bought his Carcano and shot Kennedy. He was a former Marine who was demoted in rank. He also did other crazy things, before the murders he committed.

In 1966 another former Marine, Charles Whitman, stabbed his mother and wife and entered the Univ. of Texas tower and started shooting. He killed 13 people; wounded 32. His weapons were legally obtained. He had many firearms, including a Rem 700 in 6mm, a shotgun, M1 carbine and various pistols. Whitman also had some trouble in the Marines, and was demoted. But he received an honorable discharge.

I'm not bashing Marines. My point is that a weapons bans will not prevent or cure crazy, even among our most trusted citizens. We gotta figure out how to help workers,family and friends identify the mental problems that represent a real threat. Then we need to get them some help.

O.K. So I can't buy firearms through the mail, but I've seen the other ban come and go. Not sure how we'll get around the coming crop of of restrictions, but I feel certain that we'll get what we need. Too many people use firearms for legitimate purposes, including self protection.
 
I was 21 during the GCA of 68. I had to sign and show ID for reloading componets in California. Thats when I drew the line in the sand. dont give an inch of anything.
 
I was 35 when the ban went into effect. I always felt it necessary to be able to "fight fire, with fire." My initial reaction was that the Feds were giving bad guys a lethal firepower advantage over me. I did not want to be limited to a pump shotgun or revolver if trouble comes knocking with a 30 or 60 or 100 round magazine. So like Trent, I entered the market and bought high. Trent -- nice collection young man. You all will recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, followed by the Oklahoma City bombing. LEO's in my gun club quit after the NRA started with the "jack booted thug" mantra. Out of respect for those friends, I quit the NRA for a time. I returned to the fold and have backed the strategy. This go around, I am more concerned about the mindset of this electorate combined with the impact of social media inciting mob reaction. Bob Costas may have thought he was inundated three weekends ago, but he didn't shut down his Twitter and FB feeds. The NRA did. What is up with that?
 
I was 16 when the ban went into effect. I still have an exceptionally strong memory of attending a gun show with my Dad shortly before the ban went into effect.

There was a palpable air of panic. In retrospect, some of that panic was justified, and much of it was fed into by weekend BS enthusiasts sitting behind tables. The internet hadn't yet caught on as mainstream way for gun owners to network, so the rumors were flying fast and heavy. (Claims that the law would ban all semi-automatic guns were something I recall being repeated constantly.)

At the time I was just a high school kid, so I didn't really know what to make of the whole thing, other than having a general sense of how ridiculous the whole thing was.

Cut to a few years later. I'm in college and starting to get more involved with shooting competitively, as well as interacting with online gun forums.

Around this time, I purchased my first semi-auto rifles, an Armalite M15-A2 and a Mak 90.

It didn't take long before it became blazingly obvious that the AWB was nothing more than a feel-good political handout to a public that was as ignorant about guns as they were hostile to them. I developed a bit of a sense of righteous indignation about this, which some of you may have noticed has colored some of my more recent posts.

Then 9/11 hit, and there was a cultural shift. A lot of people came to the realization that the government couldn't protect them. Gun sales spiked, as did the stock prices for Smith and Wesson and Ruger.

The trend of states liberalizing concealed carry laws continued at a steady clip, as did the number of people getting permits.

I would, when funds allowed, buy one, or maybe two 15 round CZ-75 magazines at around $65-$75, often times not knowing the provenance of the magazine.

I was part of several conversations with people who had ban-era marked magazines who were completely incredulous when they were told that owning those magazines was a felony.

I saw one attempt at a gun show where a guy walked up to a dealer at a table and tried to sell him marked magazines. (The dealer's response was a solid "not interested, buddy, now buzz off."

Oleg Volk's most effective work was completed, and distributed to the far reaches of the internet.

There were unverified rumors that some National Guard armories were coming up short on 20 and 30 round M16 magazines.

Kydex became a thing.

There were online arguments and education efforts made by many, many people on various gun forums including AR15.com, The Firing Line, and eventually here.

People began to realize that they'd been lied to by their elected officials and the media.

Around this point I became aware that things were changing. We were slowly but surely winning.

People started to be cautiously optimistic about the AWB sunsetting.

And then the day came. There was a debate on the floor of the senate about renewing the ban. The rumors were that the NRA weren't going to pursue killing it in exchange for legal immunity for the gun industry against frivolous lawsuits.

I watched the C-SPAN broadcast* with my laptop near to hand, alt-tabbing between multiple windows.

What I want to say I saw was unprecedented. A huge grass-roots cry on the web translated into massive action lighting up the switchboards of the Senate and the NRA, and within a fairly short time frame the AWB renewal went from being a sure thing to a bit iffy to being totally dead.

I really, really, want to say I remember seeing Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer on the floor having a discussion, and watching their body language become increasingly more despondent, but that may very well be just my imagination.

The day after the ban fell, I celebrated by ordering a 16 inch Rock River AR with all of the evil features. Some time after that I ordered a Beta-C drum.

IPSC became a thing again. 3 Gun started to grow and develop a reputation as something other than an "outlaw" sport, and the sunset of the ban led to a number of innovative developments in both guns and magazines.

MagPul released their rubber pull things, and eventually a new product that no one trusted called the "P-Mag."

Numerous people who came of age during the ban still remember that time, and will often times stash away magazines against the future possibility of a further ban in the same way that depression-era folks would often save buttons and thread.





*Though I'd love to see the archived video from C-SPAN because my memories of that day seem just a bit too rosy.
 
I was shooting long before, during and still shooting. I owned semi-auto rifles with high app mags. Everything was still available it all just got really expensive. If another one hits I won't like it but it won't hurt me much, I already have a good supply of everything I need.
 
I received my first .22 in 1972. I carried an M16A1 in the USAR (regular army) in the 70s, so I had no interest in the AR-15 (my memories were anything but fond).

When I heard about the assault weapon ban, I misunderstood it to be a ban on fully automatic weapons (M16 and AK47s). I honestly didn't know it was on semi-automatics or I might have said something. Instead, like many misinformed americans, I simply thought, "Good riddance, those rifles have no business on our streets..."

What a difference the internet makes...
 
Numerous people who came of age during the ban still remember that time, and will often times stash away magazines against the future possibility of a further ban in the same way that depression-era folks would often save buttons and thread.

I think people are doing that now... today. I have just about all the "evil semi automatic assualt rifles" that I really want, but only about three magazines for each, so I bought a few more yesterday, and I'll continue to try and purchase more as my finances permit and inventory become available.
 
Long before.

Hopefully everybody remembers that the last one was proven to have never prevented a single crime.

I am with CraigC on this as well. :)

I started shooting at an early age well before the ban was in place and crime was still happening all over the place. Heck, the corner store down the street from me was robbed at gunpoint it seemed every few months!
I for one am not giving up, but I am going to keep cool for the moment and not panic once all this cools off a bit there will be more time for the debates later.
 
CraigC, "Long before. Hopefully everybody remembers that the last one was proven to have never prevented a single crime."
Yep...I'm also in agreement with CraigC.

FWIW: I've been a firearms enthusiast for decades. Owning and shooting since around 1963.
.
 
Long before the ban. I honestly can't tell you when I actually bought my first magazine fed, intermediate power cartridge, short rifle or which one it was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top