Tcruse
Member
Well, the top tier of choices are 9x19, 40sw and 45 acp and second tier of choices of 357 sig, 45 gap and 10mm. Each of the second tier attempts to improve on its top tier counter part. They generally offer some performance improvement but introduce other negative changes, usually larger case, more recoil and less availability. You have two camps, the high capacity, fast and small vs the low capacity, slow and big. Then the polically correct 40sw that is a compromise in every respect. When the only ammo choice was ball or first generation hp ammo, the .45 had a real advantage over 9. Today the high tech ammo levels the field enough that the bullet performance differences are over shadowed by number of rounds and expected accuracy.
So, my choice would be 357sig or 45gap if ammo supply and cost was covered by someone else (like the government). Otherwise, I would choose the 9mm as first choice and 45 acp as second choice. The 40 just is hard to justify for either way to approach the problem.
After all a gen 4 Glock 17 shoots 9mm.
So, my choice would be 357sig or 45gap if ammo supply and cost was covered by someone else (like the government). Otherwise, I would choose the 9mm as first choice and 45 acp as second choice. The 40 just is hard to justify for either way to approach the problem.
After all a gen 4 Glock 17 shoots 9mm.