What do you look for in a handgun?

Ammo has to be available to train-practice-qualify with.
Tested to be 100 pct reliable with my carry ammo.
A Deputy-proof action in a SA or DA auto or a DA revolver.
Not a custom or one-off, a total oddball or a mil-surp. (I don’t want an heirloom getting holster rubbed and sweated on all day; a zamak, flimsy or funky gun; nor do I want to trust the springs and metallurgy of an 80-odd year old gun made during wartime.)
Comfy and effective holsters/reload carrier must be available.
The make-model-caliber (At minimum a 9mm or .38 +P) can be flexible. :)

Stay safe.
 
The Sig P365, with the manual safety, should check most of your boxes.

11 rounds as it sits. Good sights. Decent trigger. Disturbingly small for its capacity.

Available in all black. Variations cut for optics.



1718083264370.jpeg

It’s pretty hard to beat for me.
 
Compact........Sig P365
Full Size..............HK VP9
Range toy (can be used for defense).......plus its wood and steel.............Hi Power.
 
Well, aging hands are a factor. Retiree-level income, though “comfortable” income, is a factor. So:

Cartridge: Well, slow-accelerating, rather than snappy. I wrecked my hands, especially my right hand, during my seemingly-immortal twenties, during the Eighties, firing big-bore Magnum N-Frames, with my K-L-Frame-sized hands. Even though I grew out of that, by age 30, by my early forties, I was starting to feel it, and stopped shooting some “compact nines.” By age fifty, there were some duty-sized .40 pistols that were becoming painful to shoot. My SIG P229 duty pistol is now simply a collectible/artifact. I can still shoot the low-bore-axis, recoil-damping steel-frame, full-sized 1911, with gently-accelerating .45 ACP.

Slide, if auto-loader, readily grasp-able, and not too difficult to “run.”

Width/volume: Well, the grip should be neither too narrow, nor too wide. “Hand-filling” is good. Protuberances, such as “gas pedal” controls, are not desirable.

Accuracy: Well, the more accurate, the better. 3” at 50 yards is a nice goal, if a target gun. A defensive handgun, with low-profile sights, need not be that capable.

Sights: Well, suitable for the intended task.

Manual Safety: Well, yes, if a 1911. My right thumb WILL reliably detenct and operate a 1911 safety. Otherwise, I will probably not want a safety lever, but, I will evaluate each, on a case-by-case basis.

Color/Finish: Well, it depends upon use case.

Optic: The desirability of an optic depends upon the use case. My eyes “demand” a large window. Better to have nice, bold-pattern irons, than an miniaturized optic. The Aimpoint ACRO P-1/P-2 are decent, for my eyes. Aimpoint Micro is better.

Frame: Metal, if revolver. Glocks are just too useful to ignore, so, high-quality polymer is OK. My next pistol may well be a Glock G34. I have countless thousands of rounds of rounds fired, through Glocks, to hard-wire my brain and nervouse system. I made some memorable hits, with “simunition” Glocks, during live-action/force-on-force training. Real adrenaline-dump-level training.

Grip material: Well, I am open-minded. Austrian polymer to walnut. All good, in their own ways.

Track record: Well, I would rather that a weapon system prove itself, over multiple years, and that the brand have a well-established track record, with NO recent changes in ownership or management.

There is nothing quite like blue steel and walnut, aesthetically, but I find beauty and utility in stainless steel, with laminated wood grips, to use my newest acquisition, a Ruger Single Six, as an example. And, Glocks, with full-duty-sized grip frames, are my “orthopedic” pistols, if my right hand is going to be training with it. (I will still fire G19 and G26 Glocks with my still-healthier left hand.)
 
Last edited:
easy.
easy on the wallet and body to purchase, maintain, and then practice with alot. easy to load and make-safe. easy to fieldstrip to keep clean and know well. easy on the brain, i.e. intuitive and simple manual of arms.
 
I carry a P365 and it is always within reach but that gun does not excite me, it is performing very well for the intended purpose but I have always been an avid handgunner and target shooter.

I took the time this morning to go through my safes to look for ten missing SIG P210 mags and found them in the Benelli cases. I spent some time to look at each of my SIGs again and getting them ready for another outing.

What I look for in a handgun to get excited? Accuracy, shootability and quality.

 
1. Common/reputable manufacturer and model
2. Common caliber caliber.
3. Ergonomics

Beyond this basic criteria, the first thing that calls my attention is a good trigger but very few production guns have good triggers which is why that is what I always modify first so I’ll just say:
4. Aftermarket support.
 
Last edited:
The intended use and personal preferance would dictate the sellection.

For run of the mill targeting a quality 1911 in 45, or a single stack sig or SA35 in 9mm would be good choices.

Don't underestimate a good wheel gun though. If you reload a Ruger NV in 45C or any of the proshop magnums can be very pleasing to take to the range.

If for CC get something you can carry and still hit with at closer ranges. My cheif special will shoot 4" groups at 25yrds off a rest but don't expect any tiny gun to do that in a free hand defense type situation with the user in hyper mode. The LCP2 or Max guns are reliable and accurate. Any of the micro 9s will work but don't expect full size sidearm accuracy or reliability from them.
 
It depends on the purpose for which I intend the weapon. The uses I generally think about are:

1. dangerous wildlife protection (my choice would be a .44 Mag double action stainless revolver)
2. personal protection/EDC (.45 ACP lightweight single stack subcompact pistol)
3. teaching and/or plinking (.22 LR single action stainless revolver and a matching .22 LR bolt action carbine)
4. in-home defense (.45 ACP or .44 Special double action stainless revolver)
5. just because I like it (.44 Mag single action stainless revolver and a matching lever action carbine)
6. the extremely remote possibility of complete societal collapse or foreign invasion (.45 ACP and 9x19 mm modern double stack full size military pistols)
NB: this last is not something I believe is particularly likely to happen, at least not in the short term, probably not within the remaining span of my life, but the insurance against it—which for me means the two pistols above and two .308 Win rifles—is pretty cheap in the long run.
 
I am lefthanded thus. If I can't operate the the weapon with my left-hand satisfactory its a no go.
 
I carry a P365 and it is always within reach but that gun does not excite me, it is performing very well for the intended purpose but I have always been an avid handgunner and target shooter.

I took the time this morning to go through my safes to look for ten missing SIG P210 mags and found them in the Benelli cases. I spent some time to look at each of my SIGs again and getting them ready for another outing.

What I look for in a handgun to get excited? Accuracy, shootability and quality.

I would never condone carrying a 210. But if you do, I hope you never have to use it.
 
My #1 is reliabilty. If I don't trust it, I'm not going to keep it without solving whatever the problem is.
I prefer steel, satin/matte nickel just sucks my credit card out of my wallet, with blued steel close behind.
DA/SA for semiautos, it's hard to beat a CZ 75 or Beretta 92FS for both comfort and looks.
A grip I like that's comfortable. Sharp checkering, or super "grippy" I pass on.
1911 pattern guns get a hard pass too.
 
I would never condone carrying a 210. But if you do, I hope you never have to use it.
The SIG P210s are my range guns. I carried Glocks in Haiti and hope that I do not get in yet another firefight in my lifetime again, neither with a P210, Glock, nor the P365.

You have to have been there to understand.
 
Over the almost 6 decades I've been shooting, I've learned to cut my looking short by looking for Smith & Wesson written on the side of no-lock revolvers, and CZ written on the side of metal semi-autos. This always results in me being happy with my purchase. :)
 
The SIG P210s are my range guns. I carried Glocks in Haiti and hope that I do not get in yet another firefight in my lifetime again, neither with a P210, Glock, nor the P365.

You have to have been there to understand.
Understood.
 
For me it is simply looks that I choose. For over 35 years I carried a full size 1911, love the look. Than I saw a 686 with 3" barrel that I loved the look, so I retired the 1911. I never switch carry guns, it is always the same gun year after year after year that I carry and practice with. It builds confidence and reliability knowing that for years you know how it shoots. I do own a variety of range guns but up to now I have only used two carry guns.
Pleasing to the eye is a must.I wouldn't have a "clunky" gun if they were half priced.
 
For personal defense:
Essentially a Government Model with proper (larger) fixed sights and a decent trigger.
S&W K frame, made prior to 1980 or so. (Pinned barrel.)

For target work (.22lr):
Ruger .22 autopistol or S&W model 41

Goofing off and plinking:
Rather varied.
 
Back
Top