For those that don't want to click on a link without more info, it seems to be a video and discussion of photographers who take pictures from downrange (ie. in the general line of fire).
Personally while I wouldn't do it, to each his own. 'Back in the day' even police shooting teams would shoot cigarettes out of each others mouths, apples off heads, whatever. If you trust the shooter and are willing to take the risk, by all means.
But like I said, I don't think I'll be doing it any time soon.
Somehow the words "remote control" come to mind with this sort of downrange proposition. Better to lose just some camera equipment to an errant shot than the other possibility.
Agreed. In a combat situation or even some SD scenarios it's a risk I'm willing to take if the situation warrants it. But to get a good picture? I'll pass...
People do catastrophically stupid things with guns. I have youtube videos saved to my hard drive of people doing dumb things just so I can show people. Sometimes to talk someone out of a dangerous practice (like downrange photography with a fleshy person holding the camera), only blatant examples can get through.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.