madkiwi
Member
I think you guys have the story a little wrong.
I was under the impression that Randy was charged with violating the NFA- but not by shortening the barrels. Everyone and their mother, including non-firearms types, knows that short barreled shotguns are illegal, so did Randy. He did not shorten the barrel under the minimum. He was asked to shorten the stock (length of pull adjustment) which he did. He didn't realize that by doing so he made the total shotgun length less than the federal minimum length (which I think is 26" IIRC).
It was a pure setup- he was presented with a firearm that was barely long enough to begin with and asked to shorten the shoulder stock.
As to why he did it? If being ignorant but accomodating makes him a criminal, well, you could probably entrap more than a few hillbillies that way.
madkiwi
I was under the impression that Randy was charged with violating the NFA- but not by shortening the barrels. Everyone and their mother, including non-firearms types, knows that short barreled shotguns are illegal, so did Randy. He did not shorten the barrel under the minimum. He was asked to shorten the stock (length of pull adjustment) which he did. He didn't realize that by doing so he made the total shotgun length less than the federal minimum length (which I think is 26" IIRC).
It was a pure setup- he was presented with a firearm that was barely long enough to begin with and asked to shorten the shoulder stock.
As to why he did it? If being ignorant but accomodating makes him a criminal, well, you could probably entrap more than a few hillbillies that way.
madkiwi