Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What is your most reliable, accurate data manual? (with poll)

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by Stealthfixr, Sep 2, 2003.

?

What is your most reliable, accurate data manual? (with poll)

  1. Hornady "5th Edition Reloading Manual"

    5 vote(s)
    17.2%
  2. Lyman "48th Edition Reloading Handbook"

    9 vote(s)
    31.0%
  3. Midway LoadMaps

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Sierra "5th Edition Rifle and Handgun Manual of Reloading Data" Book

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  5. Speer "Reloading Manual Rifle & Pistol #13"

    9 vote(s)
    31.0%
  6. Powder Manufactuer Recommended Loads

    2 vote(s)
    6.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stealthfixr

    Stealthfixr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Alexandria VA
    Which data manual do you go to whenever your trying a new or borderline pistol load? Which currently produced data manual consistantly produces the best information for your pistol reloading?

    I've found some widely varying loads for the same caliber/bullet/powder combinations, and I am trying to build my library with the best data manuals out there. I am sure others would be interested to see how the votes tally up--thanks for your input!
     
  2. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    I second and third source all load data.
    Over the years, it seems all the sources have earned my mistrust.

    Mis written, typos, print set up errors etc etc.

    Sam
     
  3. Poodleshooter

    Poodleshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,237
    Location:
    Mr. Jefferson's country
    It really depends. None of the manuals give velocity data that is worth a hoot for me. That's what chronographs are for. I never use the exact same load combos that they specify (different primers, seating depths, bullet styles, cases,etc.), so they're often only "guidelines" for creating starting loads. I personally like to use manuals that utilize real firearms, not test receivers.
    I've found that the powder manufacturer's free manuals are as good as any of the expensive bullet manufacturer ones.
     
  4. David Wile

    David Wile Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Hey Stealth,

    Like Sam & Poodle, I rarely look something up in one book without looking the same thing up in at least one more book. Somethings I look in a whole bunch of books. However, if I could only have one reloading manual, it would be the Lyman manual. My second choice would be the Hornady manual I guess. Lyman's manuals have been the most informative manuals over many years.

    Best wishes,
    Dave Wile
     
  5. WhoKnowsWho

    WhoKnowsWho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,432
    Location:
    Maricopa, AZ
    I have the Lyman 48th edition manual.

    And I picked up all the FREE manufacturer's manuals of the powders I have been using.

    Looking at getting another manual later, either the Speer or Lee.
     
  6. Steyr Hahn

    Steyr Hahn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Messages:
    33
    Location:
    Eastern North Carolina
    Like what David Wile said and Steven's Pages

    You can never have to much load data!
     
  7. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    I voted for Speer's #13 but,

    I have used the following with excellent result's:

    Lyman's Cast Bullet Handbook

    Sierra's 1st edition manual

    Hornady Handbook For Pistol & Rifle


    Best Wishes,
    Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
     
  8. BenW

    BenW Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,116
    Location:
    CA
    I usually end up defaulting to the Lyman manual, but not until checking out at least a couple of others to see where overlap in min/max powder loads occurs.
     
  9. Chugach

    Chugach Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    232
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    I'm relatively new at reloading (less than a year). Came to the game late. In talking with friends that have reloaded for decades, I was convinced to never single-source reloading data. I use the Speer #13 and the Sierra 5th, as well as Winchester and Hogdon data. Will eventually pick up Lyman, and maybe Hornady.
     
  10. JackM

    JackM Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    161
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    If I was limited to one, it would be Lyman's, but I've also got Hodgdon, Hornady, Nosler, Sierra, Speer and the powder companies freebees.

    Bye
    Jack
     
  11. sensop

    sensop Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Middle Georgia, USA
    As far as "load data" goes, they are all suspect and should be cross checked with each other, as C.R. Sam stated. But for the new handloader, (or the experienced handloader for that matter) the best explanations, with drawings/pictures of the firing cycle, the relationship between the brass and the chamber, the loaded components, the transition to the bore, behavior in the bore and external ballistics all in one place, is in the Hornady manuals, followed closely by Lyman. That's just my own experience. I go to different manuals for different things. Never too many reloading manuals. The changes from year to year in the same manuals are pretty interesting!
     
  12. caz223

    caz223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,739
    Location:
    SW Michigan
    I don't think of load books as recipe books.
    I kinda look for agreements and things that the loads have in common.
    I consult my burn rate chart, my lee dipper measure slider (To see how full the case will be.) and see if the powder manufacturers and bullet manufacturers loads agree.
    If it looks to good to be true, chances are that it is.
    For what it's worth, I've never found one load in perfect agreement from three different sources.
    That tells me:
    1. your mileage may vary.
    2. Each gun is it's own story. Each load is too.
    3. Start low, and work up. They are your eyes, fingers, and loved ones.
    4. Never trust any one source for load data, no matter what. (Chances are, that if you only have one source for that powder in this caliber with this bullet, that that one load will suck in some way.)
     
  13. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    I've seen typos in most of em. Never trust anything that doesn't make sense.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page