SC does, because SLED is allowed regulatory discretion. Without a specific provision by the legislature, I think it is consistent for SLED to say that their role should ensure that licensees are "law abiding" people. Yes, we don't like it, but I fault the legislature for allowing SLED to make all the rules. It is noteworthy that at least our laws found it necessary to specify "shall issue". I will assume that if given their way, SLED would prefer that only they or their official superiors would or could have guns or carry them.
I don't regard the desire to drive as fast or irresponsibly as one pleases to be an entitlement. I wouldn't support using traffic tickets as a way of harassing people. I will say that we need more enforcement of traffic laws, judging from how defensive one must be and how blatant the violatons are that one can observe.
I don't support State licensing in the first place and am not an apologist for the State Police. Compared to some other States, we do have a tolerable status quo. It's just that I have to be especially conscientious about my driving, protecting my ability to renew what SC calls a "CWP". That doesn't please me, but I am already a careful driver and am not very sympathetic to those with chronic problems with traffic tickets.
I would like to recommend use of a the spell checker. You can install either Spellbound for Firefox or IESpell for Internet Explorer, both free.