In my case, as pointed out in earlier posts, the revolver would be DAO in the first place.
But anyway, I doubt that in the situation you proposed the gun owner would suffer any liability - if he had followed a command "to lay the gun on the ground and step back."
While it's far from true, the public presumes that a police officer knows everything about guns - of all kinds - thanks to TV, movies, etc.
In real life if the officer was stumped he/she would have the option of calling a supervisor and let them handle it.
If the officer went forward and goofed, resulting in an unintended discharge it would be their problem.
But anyway, I doubt that in the situation you proposed the gun owner would suffer any liability - if he had followed a command "to lay the gun on the ground and step back."
While it's far from true, the public presumes that a police officer knows everything about guns - of all kinds - thanks to TV, movies, etc.
In real life if the officer was stumped he/she would have the option of calling a supervisor and let them handle it.
If the officer went forward and goofed, resulting in an unintended discharge it would be their problem.