What's the best Second Amendment purpose rifle/caliber?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You've seen too many sci fi and action films.

No military in the world (including our own) has enough drones to commit them to taking out a "pickup truck full of AR15-armed yahoos" that comprises just a few of the 80 million gun owners they're up against.

There's also this perpetual illusion that our government could actually turn our troops on us. Some, sure, but the overwhelming majority simply won't do it. They're also sworn to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. A tyrannnical government is a domestic enemy. Any order they're given that violates the constitution is an invalid order, even if it comes from POTUS himself.
I gotta agree with this 100 percent. The vast majority of the military will never turn against its own peopl here in the US because our military is made up of the people.

For anything like that to happen the military would have to be seperated from the population somehow. Many places in the world where that happens its over religion which is easy to do because the people are raised to believe they are better than someone else because of their beliefs. With all our problems here in America most everyone believes we are all American first.
 
I went with the FN FAL.

Battle proven, easily maintained, full on Battle Rifle cartridge, large capacity magazines and accurate enough for my purposes.
 
I think we've gotten a tad off track; I thought the question was which rifle/caliber combo best promotes the 2nd Amendment, not what would your main/side arm selection be for a Red Dawn scenario :rolleyes:

I'd have to go with the 50BMG (or something equivalently loud), or anything select-fire. Both illustrate the potential of this all-important power placed in the hands of the people more than anything currently legal to us now. They also illustrate just how limited our defensive powers as civilians are, when you compare civilian-legal weaponry against that of our armed forces. Both also show that gunowners can be trusted with the possession of such "ultimate power" without going power-mad and tyrranizing our neighbors (pro-control guys really do think this way) since the two have nearly (if not) zero criminal record.

TCB
 
How exactly does a caliber "promote" the second amendment? I really don't get the question.
 
5.56 for long arm

9mm for pistol

Mainly for ammo availability. (also if it is an AR type or a 92 type, parts availability)
 
The KY constitution says:

"The organization, equipment and discipline of the militia shall conform as nearly as practicable to the regulations for the government of the armies of the United States."

That means an AR15 of some type.

I would go along with this - an AR, caliber 5.56/.223.

And a quality 9mm pistol. Of course the Beretta 92 could use military magazines.
 
I gotta agree with this 100 percent. The vast majority of the military will never turn against its own peopl here in the US because our military is made up of the people.

I agree that most troops would not fight other Americans, but while I could not predict the circumstances, there was once a Civil War here in the United States where one side was viewed as tyrannical. I don't think it would ever happen, but would never say it's impossible.

But I feel this line of discussion is accordance with the OP as the 2nd Amendment, as it was made to be a deterrent to a tyrannical government. So I interpret this as what weapon is best for fighting the tyrant.
 
The Colonial Militia in 1776 drove off the Redcoats because they were using their own, privately owned rifles, and knew how to shoot. The Redcoats were mostly conscripts armed with smoothbore muskets, with no training in accurate shooting, who depended on massed firepower to win a battle.
If I were facing a modern flock of Redcoats, armed with 5.56mm carbines, and little training in precision shooting, I'd want something in a .30 calibre rifle that would outrange them. An M1 Garand or an M1A would be a good choice, if you can shoot it well enough to get regular hits beyond the 300 meter effective range of something like an AR in .223.
I think everyone who actively supports the 2nd Ammendment, and the Constitution as a whole, should own an accurate rifle, know how to shoot it, and vote for a representative government that supports our rights under the Constitution.
 
I thought the question was which rifle/caliber combo best promotes the 2nd Amendment

Any rifle. It doesn't matter if its a Cricket or a BAR..

Not segregating out types of arms is the entire point.
 
NoirFan said:
Any quiet caliber that comes in a small concealable pistol, like a 22LR. In a modern armed rebellion that pickup truck full of AR15-armed yahoos won't even get all the way out of the garage before it gets zapped by an aerial drone, or informed on by their neighbors. The only effective shooting that our hypothetical patriotic freedom fighters would be doing is executing and intimidating soft targets like civilian collaborators and the families of soldiers at close range.

Anyway, the resistance movements in Iraq and Afghanistan have shown us that small arms are kid stuff. If you really wish to harm the government and your fellow Americans, stock up on fertilizer, bomb components and discreet torture implements like pliers, car batteries, etc.

Well, small arms are definitely not the most effective against OUR troops in Afghanistan, but our guys are just a small part of the picture when it comes to the power dynamic in that country. The Taliban's small arms are plenty effective against the Afghan police and security forces, who take the majority of the casualties. Once we secure a region, it is up to them to keep it under control. Remember, the EASIEST job of the 1st-world counter-insurgent is winning on the battlefield... the hardest thing for them to do is to install an effective government to maintain long-term control. The insurgent doesn't have to directly engage the combat troops... he just has to wait until they leave and stick it to the police that are left behind to maintain order, who are generally much softer targets. Hence the frequent reports of Afghan police outposts being overrun in rural areas, and why the Taliban is in control of large parts of the country despite an 11 year military campaign against them by the world's most powerful military and its allies. All this in a country smaller than the State of Texas.

It would be a similar situation if an insurgency situation were to take place here in the 'States, a la a 2A situation. Many people have the notion that it would come down to going toe to toe with the military. That is not likely to be the case for the majority of the fighting. The fact is, there will not be a squadron of Apaches and a detachment of Bradleys in every little podunk town across the country (or even across a disrupted region of the country). Every country which has tried to install a police state over it's own people always relies mostly on, well, the POLICE to deal with domestic resistance. If you want an idea of what the State's forces might look like in a potential 2A situation, look no further than your local law enforcement agencies. Also consider the historical fact that most domestic police states are accompanied by a strongly interventionist foreign policy... meaning that the majority of the military's seasoned troops are committed to foreign theatres.

Having said all that, you are definitely onto something regarding the benefits of small and easily concealable weapons. If you are playing the insurgent, assassination is definitely one way to leverage your strengths and disrupt the enemy's attempts to effectively govern occupied territory. There is a great book called "The Squad," about Michael Collins' IRA hit squad and how effective it was in disrupting British law enforcement in Ireland in the 1920s. Highly recommended for anyone interested in the study of resistance movements.

Handguns have obvious benefits for this role, but so do small/folding stock rifles. I think the SBR has a strong 2A role to fill, along with the more commonly mentioned carbines, battle rifles, and long range precision rifles.

As for you who say that the majority of the armed state employees wouldn't go along with tyrannical orders, I think you underestimate the effects of group dynamics, the ease of demonizing an enemy (even a domestic one), and of how easy it is to come up with an emergency sufficient to justify drastic measures in the minds of many. I'm sure there are a lot of people in a lot of other countries who never could have imagined their own countrymen doing the kinds of things to them that they did. That is all I will say on that matter, in the interest of keeping this thread from drifting way too far afield.

Good stuff guys... keep it coming.
 
Last edited:
The best rifle for 2A purposes is the one each man has in his closet and knows how to use. Our defense against tyranny (in my part of the world) is simply that the government does not know exactly how many Texans are armed, or with what, or where we keep 'em, or how many hundreds of rounds any man has, or how many of us would rise up to defend our Constitutional liberties... but a good educated guess might be LOTS.
 
Well regulated to me means the standard military callibers and truthfully this makes sense. In a true emergency being able to use the same rounds and magazines as the military means you can use battlefield pickups. Lets face it the 2nd was put in as a garentor of our freedom from an overreaching govt. not necessarily Red Dawn scenario.
 
2nd amendment--- a ballot box or an Air Force

I gotta agree with this 100 percent. The vast majority of the military will never turn against its own people here in the US because our military is made up of the people.

I served 20 years in the USAF and dearly love this country, that said

History does not support this belief
. From George Washington leading troops to crush the whiskey rebellion, the Civil War, use of nation guard troops on coal miner (The Ludlow Massacre was an attack by the Colorado National Guard 1910), The US Army routing the Bounce Army out Washington DC in 1932 (lead by Gen Douglas MacArthur.). The internment of Japanese-American during WW2, Kent State, This does not even start to list the government agencies that have turn weapons on American citizens. If you are a native American you just might take issue with the idea that the US government would not put a bayonet in your back and forcing you off your land.

Most people that have not seen combat have no idea what the effect of U.S. conventional air power. From taking out a singular car to wiping a complete city off the map the USAF and Navy/Marine air power is almost beyond belief.

The Military is not a collection of civilians. It is a body human soldiers trained to put service before self. A sergeant's duty is complete a mission, not to rationalize the moral implication of it. It is the duty of the elected government to judge the morality of a war or action.
There are rules of war and our military does a better job than any at trying obey them. But rules are not as set in stone.

The idea that a civil country can not break down into worse kind of human behavior is not supported by recent history. Stalin, Hitler, have had may students.



Your 2nd amendment rifle is ballot box.


But if you want to take up arms again United States Military you will need a class of weapon far beyond the small arms. A combination of computers, communications, aircraft, anti-aircraft weapons, an force multipliers.


But if I must claim a weapon as a modern 2nd Amendment weapon, ether a Socom 16 or an AR15 H-bar
 
Last edited:
WWII browning BAR. Market price is about $25,000
It's THE iconic hand-carried weapon of the Big War. If you doubt it's power, read how Clyde Barrow used one to became a one man army against multiple LEOs during his infamous career.
 
lefteyedom,
History shows only the civil war to be the government intrusion of significance. It was to keep the union, a UNION.
A general uprising throughout the land would see NO military intervention. Is the Air National Guard going to have an air battle with the Air Force? No. Is the Army National Guard going to repel an air-drop assault by the 101st Airborne? No.
An all outn uprising in this country would see Air Force bases Immediately overrun. The only air power left would be overseas and carrier based.
Then you must remember this country is being watched by our REAL enemy. They WANT us to fight among ourselves so they can just walk on in.
Harley Rider 55
SMSgt USAF Retired
PJ - "That Others May Live"
 
For me the best Second Amendment purpose rifle would be a Colt AR-15.

And in case this question is extended to other arms, I would have a Colt Government in .45ACP as the best pistol and a Mossberg 500 in 12 gauge as the best shotgun.
 
Last points

Harley Rider 55:
History shows only the civil war to be the government intrusion of significance.

I would respectfully disagree with that conclusion, the listed government intrusions were significant enough to accomplish the mission.

A nation wide general up raising would not go unnoticed nor unchallenged.

The Nation Guard while under control of state governors are in point of fact are resources of under the control of the Pentagon.

The heart of the question would a 18 year old E-2 shoot someone for crossing a red line painted on the tarmac? Would they open fire on civilians climbing the WSA fence? Would an AC-130 crew hosing people off of a WSA fence? Anyone that served in SAC knows what that answer is. The troops on active duty today are just driven as those of old.

It has been nearly 150 years since this country last saw major warfare on the homeland. The 9/11 attacks while tragic were hardly a single days battle causalities in the Civil War. Walk a few of those battlefields and ponder the cost. Now multiply that carnage by what ever factor you believe current weapons have advance since Gettysburg. (yes tactic have change, put the point stands)

When a fire brand politician use phrases like "2nd amendment solution" they have no idea what type of hell on earth they are talking about.

One of the outcome of Timothy McVeigh's bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was that people woke up to the idea that federal government is made up of American people. The images of dead children being pulled out of the day care wreckage sucked the wind out of budding militia movement at that time. Hopefully we do not need another such attack to remind us what the stakes are.

Be active in local and state government. Make yourself know to your Congressman and if possible your senators. Blood shed is the ultimate failure in negotiations. What part of" love your neighbor as yourself" did we not get in Sunday School?
 
What's the best Second Amendment purpose rifle/caliber?

Any rifle that shoots 5.56/.223 or 7.62/.308..............

Any pistol that shoots .45 ACP, 9mm, or .40 cal..............
 
Recent history shows us that the Soviet Union collapsed with no shots fired. Simplest put, bankruptcy sapped the will of the rulers--and the billfolds of the military. Government employees like to get paid, same as everybody else.

I figure that if things get horrible enough that we look to the Preamble of the Bill of Rights and the actual need for the Second Amendment in order to avoid abuse of power by the State*, we're back to local scenarios and the usual "mindset, skill set, weapons set, in that order".

Run whatcha brung, most anything will do.


* IMO, we've been seeing abuses of power for a long time, but they've not been intolerable to Joe Sixpack.
 
Something with a lot of reach and excellent optics.

Say the 338 Lapua class or 50 BMG.

Backed up of course with an AR and sidearm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top