Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Whats up with this?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by plmcrzy, Feb 21, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. plmcrzy

    plmcrzy Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2010
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I was online looking at my local newspaper when I came across an article about two men getting busted for a clandestin pot farm. Among the articals siezed was a altered/sawed off shotgun that the authorities charged them with possesion of a weapon of mass destruction! Since when did that come into play as a weapon of mass destruction? Am I missing something here? Thoughts anybody?
     
  2. wbwanzer

    wbwanzer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,157
    I would not have thought of it as such.
     
  3. kingpin008

    kingpin008 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,435
    Location:
    Howard County, Merry Land
    It's a newspaper. The media have never been known for accuracy when reporting about firearms. Did you expect something different?
     
  4. plmcrzy

    plmcrzy Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2010
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Kingpin, you have a point, but really, I mean really?
     
  5. TCB in TN

    TCB in TN Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    Middle, TN
    Probably got confused. If I remember right sawed off shotty would be classified as a DD destructive device (or some such) and the brilliant reporter either got it wrong or took a little creative liberty with the wording.
     
  6. ceetee

    ceetee Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,998
    IIRC, a short-barreled shotgun is an Any Other Weapon. The main difference being a $5 tax stamp rather than a $200 stamp (as in a short-barreled rifle).
     
  7. kingpin008

    kingpin008 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,435
    Location:
    Howard County, Merry Land
    Yes, really. The media makes ridiculous mistakes and exaggerations everyday. This is one of them. I really don't see why it warrants such jaw-dropping incredulity.

    And ultimately, what's the point in complaining about it if you're not going to bother to offer up a correction? How about, any time we see or hear something nonsensical or incorrect in regards to firearms in the media we take the time to call or write in and correct them? Maybe then we'd be able to save ourselves the trouble of making threads like this, because it wouldn't happen in the first place.
     
  8. Lonestar49

    Lonestar49 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,654
    Location:
    So. Calif.
    Actually..

    ...

    Semi sawed off shotgun (legal)

    Riot gun

    Scatter gun

    Weapon of mass destruction.. yea, but it was most likely "The_Headline" to sell the story of Newspaper "spin"..


    Ls
     
  9. merlinfire

    merlinfire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    If that's a WMD, I betcha they found some in Iraq after all.
     
  10. Vyacheslav

    Vyacheslav member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    196
    $5 transfer, to create one it's still $200
     
  11. buttrap

    buttrap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,088
    Location:
    Oregon
    NC law classes a sawed off shotgun as a weapon of mass destruction so the media was just following the legal angle is all.
     
  12. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,510
    Location:
    Central PA
    FEDERALLY: Any shotgun with barrels less than 18" long, and/or with a total overall length of less than 26" is a National Firearms Act -- Title II regulated "Short Barreled Shotgun."

    IF the firearm was manufactured as a pistol -- not made with a shoulder stock, and NEVER fitted with a shoulder stock -- then it is an "Any Other Weapon", which is also a Title II regulated firearm.

    NC State law defines large-bore (> .50 cal) weapons which are not particularly "sporting" as "Weapons of Mass Destruction." See here: http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/14-criminal-law/14-288.8.html

    So ... the paper was right in reporting what state laws he was charged with breaking.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page