What's your preference and why?

Which J-frame do you prefer?

  • S&W 340 / 360

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • S&W 340PD / 360PD

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • S&W 340SS / 360SS

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • S&W M&P340 / M&P360

    Votes: 12 48.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 LT MPC - I get the same warm fuzzy feeling......

"J" frames ain't Six Guns. I can't understand folks buying a "J" frame when there are so many "K", "L", and "N" frame Smiths for sale. However, all you folks who like the "J" frame - please keep buying, (I have a few shares of S&W stock).
 
None of them

I have nothing against J frame even own one, but I don't care for super light .357 pistols. The Airwieght .38s are as light as I care to go. For .357 in a J I want steel frame and full size grips.
 
M&P 360. If you've seen the Shooting Gallery episode on snubbies, Walt Rauch refers to "left it" guns and my Ruger SP101 was turning into one as it's 2x the weight of the M&P.
 
None of the above. The recoil of "Airlites" is just not worth the minor weight savings. I rarely even carry my Airweight J, as needing something so small and light is very unusual.
 
NONE OF THE ABOVE!

The best J frames are the pinned barrel, all steel Model 36 and the all steel bodyguard. Don't give me no three digit Smith.
 
The Old Fuff is in agreement with most other posters (so far). He finds nothing in the list that's interesting. :uhoh:
 
six is better than five.

Yeah and 7 is better than six. So why not get a 1911?

Instead of everyone jumping on the "we need six shots to party" bandwagon how about you vote which is your preference (or don't vote at all) like the OP asked.

After you finish doing that (or not doing that) you can feel free to make your own thread on why 6-shots are better than 5-shots.
 
Alan Fud - I like all of them for what they are. Interesting handguns using state of the art metals and manufacturing techniques. But I won't be buying any of them. I like all the j frames but prefer my 24/7 CCW a 642. And I am becoming more interested in the older j and i frames the more I learn about them.
 
None of the above wins again. Pre-lock all steel are the only J frames of any interest to me. 3" barrel is preferred but my old 2" model 36 was a rather sweet number.

mike
 
Well, I did not vote but I am curious -- why did you leave out the model 60? :what:


:evil:
 
well then call me a young humbug. I'm not a fan of the ones listed, hence the no vote. Now if 642 was one of the options...

I like my handguns to have a little weight behind them and i don't really like titanium or scandium.
 
I voted M&P 360 - they rock.

I keep my 2 pound six shooters for night stand, range work and cowboy shoots - where they belong ;)

(kind of like a woman in the kitchen) [someone's going to kill me for that one]

My 360 weighs ~15oz loaded with full house 357's and 5 shots on your belt or in your pocket is better than 6 shots in your glove box any day.

(Intentionally fanning the flames... :D)
 
Can't find merit on carrying a gun...

....not designed for gunfighting.
If it is up to me, and it is, I'll carry a REAL revolver/auto that can do whatever I may need. Pocket guns are a backup to your backup.
 
I voted 340m&p but only on your dime my money was and would be spent on a 442.
and even if you gave me one I would not use full house 357 either.
gold dot SB or maybe golden sabers maybe
 
I have the best mix of all. A 360PD with tritium sight and spurless hammer from a 340. Wolff springs and C&S firing pin. 11.5 ounces empty. No corrosion. Great DA, for a J-frame anyway. Comfortable with +P. I guess guys who need more than 5 rounds figure they're going to make an assault on a gang hideout, or stop the Wild Bunch from robbing the town bank. Civilian gunfights happen at very close ranges, and are over in a second or two. Maybe somebody falls down, maybe not, and everybody runs away as fast as they can. Protracted lead sharing is something for the authorities, not some guy protecting himself from a mugger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top