No, I understand about the averages and certainly there's been enough conflict over the last 50 years to reach some high numbers (including up to 250,000), but where might there be data available about the weapons used. For instance, looking at the numbers for casualties in genocide, civil war, irregular/asymmetric conflict, we can't assume those were all deaths by AKs (for instance, in many cases only one side might have had AKs or even means beyond small arms were used. For instance the numbers for genocide in Rwanda are probably mostly not attributable to AKs (an awful lot of that was committed by machetes and other low tech weapons). I'm really most interested in the source for the data (ie which NGO, UN committee, federal agency, etc might break down those numbers on weapons used and release them) or did someone just add up those numbers and take some percentage of it to reflect the availability of AKs in the conflict? I'm just curious how they came up with the number and what data sets they're using.