I apply that in all cases. I used to be a "#68" loader - after I lost my source of 452460s - but I got tired of the tinkering with OAL, magazine choice, and barrel "throating", so when I found some 200 gr roundnose bullets, I went over to them and have been quite content. I wonder if part of the fussiness is due to so-called #68 bullets deviating from the original Crawford design by Hensley and Gibbs and from each other.
There are others, most of which are identified by a flared bumper pad that wraps around the bottom of the tube rather than just on the bottom.
I agree with you and the one mag I won't buy from CheckMate again is their non-extended tube 8 rounder. In my eclectic collection of 1911 mags they are the most difficult mags to seat with a full mag and the slide forward.Checkmate has two superficially similar looking magazines. I bought the wrong one. It will HOLD 8 but with no slack and cannot be loaded under a closed slide. The other with an EXT suffix on the part number is a true native 8 shot.