Which conversion cylinders for Remington 1858?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Beauhooligan

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
50
Location
Central California
I have these stainless Pietta '58 Remingtons and another pair of blue 5 1/2" models on order. I've come across a bit of extra Christmas cash and am thinking of buying .45 Colt conversion cylinders. The question is whether to buy Kirst or Kenny Howell's R&D cylinders? I'm not going to cut the frames, and will buy cylinders in stainless as the SS revolvers are my workhorses, and a two tone effect should look cool on the blued pistols. What do you folks think? I appreciate your comments in advance.:)
 
I have both. If you are leaveing the guns stock, I would go with the R&D, or Howell's Conversion cylinder [yes I know they are the same, but you can still get NOS R&D cylinders] if you plan on a more permanent conversion I would go with the Kirst, and go one step more, and buy the ejector.
 
yea, but............

The Kirst acts like an "unported" conversion in an unaltered pistol. For the price difference get the Kirst, you can and might change your mind at a later date about porting. If you do so than you are stuck with the R&D and the resale on them is a LOT LOWER!
 
I'd agree with Hoof Hearted on that. You just might get that urge someday to cut the recoil shield and go all the way. I bought an R&D cylinder for my ROA because the recoil shield will NEVER get cut on it and I liked the R&D better than the Kirst for that application.
 
I'm going to buy from Taylor's and get the drop in R&D cylinders. The prices seem to be very good and I know folks in SASS who do business with Taylor's and have been very satisfied.

Thank you for your input. I'll let you know how the cylinders turn out.:)
 
I'm going with a pair of the Kirst. But have no intention to cut the recoil shields I just want the option of shooting light loads in my 1858's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top