The thing with the SRs is that they have a LE friendly trigger: Not too light, not too heavy. Perfect for a fighting pistol really. The older models stacked like cards, but I JUST messed with a new one, and it ain't half bad.Well, sorry about the Ruger war here, I didn't mean for that to happen.
I am happy with my SR40, I put a lot of cheap and good rounds through it and never had a problem.
To clarify things here, I'm looking for that 1 handgun that I love everything about.
& since I already have a SR40, I didn't want to consider a SR9.
I've also head that the SR9c has a better trigger, but I'm looking for a full size gun, not a compact.
On mine, the travel is to long, and I don't much care for a 6-1/2 pound pull. Aside from that, the trigger works as it's supposed to.
I have thought about the P95, just wasn't sure, plus it has a shorter barrel as well. I use my Sig as my CC weapon, and it has worked out great.
So I'm asking what's your opinion of the 2 I listed above,
or do you have an entirely different suggestion?
You mean there are bad CZs?From two you listed I have experience with Phantom only. No experience with XD.
Phantom is a great pistol, but when I was looking at phantom i ended up buying CZ 75 Tactical Sports. Its worth a look if you want a good CZ.
No, molded polymer. Watch the movie I linked to in my first post in this thread for some closer looks at the Phantom.from what I've read regarding the Phantom, it's grips are rubber,
Yes your right, I have never shot the 100.No, molded polymer. Watch the movie I linked to in my first post in this thread for some closer looks at the Phantom.
The CZ-75 is NOT related to the Browning Hi-Power...that gets thrown out a lot. Yes, there are some Browning concepts in the gun, but I would be hard pressed to find many that don't use one or another concepts from the great man. But Steven A Camp, a great Hi Power expert, (God rest his soul), had an excellent article about the differences between the HP and CZ.
I hope you find the gun that is right for you - the beauty of American, diversity means many things, like a gunshops shelves filled with different handguns to try until you find the one that fits you. Mine is CZ, and I conceal a Phantom easily with the right leather, like this High Noon Down Under with straps.
kokapelli, if you ever tried a CZ-100, you wouldn't say that. I am a dyed in the wool CZ man, and I wouldn't have another CZ-100 for anything but a collectible wall hanger.
Disagree. I find the SR series to also have less than desirable triggers. I also disagree that the SR trigger is better than the M&P, which is smoother to me."Quite a lot", really? How many have you actually fired?!
Oh, wait! TWO!!
Don't believe all the stories you read on the Internet. My SR40 has an exceptional trigger and I don't think I am the exception here.
The SR Series pistols are vastly underrated.
Just because Ruger isn't pimping itself out to Military and Law Enforcement, it shouldn't be overlooked as a fantastic gun.
I've "heard" that the SR Series has a better trigger than Smith & Wesson's over priced M&P series.