I've never owned a Glock, and if I get one I figure I might as well get one in a caliber I don't own.
31 is the standard full-size .357 Sig, of course.
20 is the 10mm, allowing for .357 Sig, .40 S&W and 10mm (nb: I actually don't own any of the three) w/ conversion barrels
22 is the .40 S&W (& .357 Sig)
Is there a reason not to go for a 20, difference in handling or reliability with the conversion barrels? Not concerned about defensive reliability, this is more a pistol to find out how I like the calibers (and Glocks), but I don't want it to be a constant struggle with feeding/extracting/etc..
31 is the standard full-size .357 Sig, of course.
20 is the 10mm, allowing for .357 Sig, .40 S&W and 10mm (nb: I actually don't own any of the three) w/ conversion barrels
22 is the .40 S&W (& .357 Sig)
Is there a reason not to go for a 20, difference in handling or reliability with the conversion barrels? Not concerned about defensive reliability, this is more a pistol to find out how I like the calibers (and Glocks), but I don't want it to be a constant struggle with feeding/extracting/etc..