Who gets your vote in '08?

Who are you going to vote for?

  • Sam Brownback

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Jim Gilmore

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • John McCain

    Votes: 9 1.7%
  • Rudy Giuliani

    Votes: 6 1.2%
  • Mike Huckabee

    Votes: 8 1.5%
  • Fred Thompson

    Votes: 247 47.7%
  • Duncan Hunter

    Votes: 9 1.7%
  • Ron Paul

    Votes: 194 37.5%
  • Mitt Romney

    Votes: 9 1.7%
  • Tom Tancredo

    Votes: 6 1.2%
  • Tommy Thompson

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 13 2.5%
  • Barak Obama

    Votes: 13 2.5%

  • Total voters
    518
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fred Thompson is telling you what you want to hear. He is a country club republican who will shred the second amendment to pieces once he gets into office.

His record is clear. He supported the Domestic Confiscation gun ban, the young adult gun ban, etc.. I doubt his views are much different then Hillary's.
 
The guy in Chad's video seems so credible! They should have him on Meet the Press.
 
OK seriously, who voted for Obama and Hilary in this poll? Whoever you are, you must not value your gun rights very much.
 
I will be working to get Dr.Pauls message out, and have him as the Republican candidate.
If he is not, it really doesn't matter. Every other choice will be for the CFR, different roads, same destination.
 
Fred got my vote.

Ron Paul?
In the debate, didnt he suggest the Bush admin was behind 9/11? :scrutiny: Maybe Elvis should be on the poll too.
 
"I'm voting for whoever I think can beat either Hillary or Obama."quote

I have to agree and I am interested in who voted for them in the poll.
I don't see anyone on the list who floats my boat, but several scare me to death.
 
tepin asked,
Ron Paul?
In the debate, didnt he suggest the Bush admin was behind 9/11?
No he did not.
Not even close.
You should listen to what was said, The truth will set you free.
 
I think many people who are supporting Fred Thompson are doing so without realizing he is exactly the same as Bush on many issues.

He voted for Campaign Finance Reform, Medicare Reform, and the Patriot Act.
 
I think many people who are supporting Fred Thompson are doing so without realizing he is exactly the same as Bush on many issues.

Like Bush, Fred Thompson supports limiting the 1st Amendment, broadening the power and scope of the federal government, and expanding welfare programs. He has a voting record to prove it.

If you don't like Bush, voting for Fred Thompson is not the answer.
 
Is anyone else discouraged already???

I know this has been alluded to before, but there appears to be no 1 candidate that has it all. I vote for a combo of Tom. Fred, and Newt. Since that is NOT going to happen, I vote for the Highroad.:) I think there is more wit and wisdon in this group, than in all of Washington DC Just my 2c. :D

PPP
 
Well, since you are supporter #2202, how about saving the group some time and telling us what he said; to set us free.

pcosmar said:
tepin asked,

Quote:
Ron Paul?
In the debate, didnt he suggest the Bush admin was behind 9/11?

No he did not.
Not even close.
You should listen to what was said, The truth will set you free.
__________________
I may not be able to help myself, but I may help someone else.
Registered Ron Paul Supporter #2202
 
I'd be interested to know why there are so many Ron Paul supporters, seeing as he voted against protecting gun manufacturers from fraudulent law suits.
 
Well, since you are supporter #2202, how about saving the group some time and telling us what he said; to set us free.
Thank you for asking. There have been many posts, whole threads in fact with links to the videos from the debates and commentary afterward.
Ron Paul stated that it was the policy of intervention in the ME that caused the attack. It was the overthrowing of leaders, keeping troops on holy land and the killing of hundreds of thousands, over the years that led to the attacks.
These facts were presented to the 911 commission, and were part of there report. The CIA says this is the reason for the attack.
Ron Paul said that the policy was at fault, and should be changed.

This is some related reading about blowback, from 2001.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011015/johnson
 
I'd be interested to know why there are so many Ron Paul supporters, seeing as he voted against protecting gun manufacturers from fraudulent law suits.


Second Amendment rights

The only 2008 presidential candidate to earn Gun Owners of America's (GOA) A+ rating, Paul has authored and sponsored pro-Second Amendment legislation in Congress. In the first chapter of his book, Freedom Under Siege, Paul argued that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to place a check on government tyranny, not to merely grant hunting rights or allow self-defense. He has also fought for the right of pilots to be armed.

Paul has long been quoted front and center on the Gun Owners of America home page, referring back to the organization as "'The only no-compromise gun lobby in Washington.' -Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#Second_Amendment_rights
 
A few of my buds and I rode our bikes over to another neighborhood to help one house on the block defend itself from invasion from second house in that neighborhood. A couple of my buds stayed there to ensure the peace and help hold some feet to the fire on some agreements made. It was in our interest to help this house too.

A third house in the neighborhood, one that has attacked my buds and I at our own house before, flew some model airplanes with bombs on them into our house and killed many.

It was our fault for the attacks by those bomb carrying model airplanes, killing many in our house. Yes, my buds fault and mine of course, since we were in that other neighborhood helping that innocent house defend itself from the second house, the one that invaded them.

We're such arrogant azzholes. Looking back, we really deserved it. What the hell were we thinking.
 
A few of my buds and I rode our bikes over to another neighborhood to help one house on the block defend itself from invasion from second house in that neighborhood. A couple of my buds stayed there to ensure the peace and help hold some feet to the fire on some agreements made. It was in our interest to help this house too.
Marshall, This sounds like Gang activity. Are still in a street gang.

Our overthrow of the lawful elected leader of Iran in 53, and setting up a ruthless dictator so we could control the oil, Is the type of thug tactics I would expect from a criminal. Not from my government, in my name.
 
A few of my buds and I rode our bikes over to another neighborhood to help one house on the block defend itself from invasion from second house in that neighborhood. A couple of my buds stayed there to ensure the peace and help hold some feet to the fire on some agreements made. It was in our interest to help this house too.

A third house in the neighborhood, one that has attacked my buds and I at our own house before, flew some model airplanes with bombs on them into our house and killed many.

It was our fault for the attacks by those bomb carrying model airplanes, killing many in our house. Yes, my buds fault and mine of course, since we were in that other neighborhood helping that innocent house defend itself from the second house, the one that invaded them.

We're such arrogant azzholes. Looking back, we really deserved it. What the hell were we thinking.


to bad the real world is never this black and white
 
Our overthrow of the lawful elected leader of Iran in 53, and setting up a ruthless dictator so we could control the oil, Is the type of thug tactics I would expect from a criminal. Not from my government, in my name.

PCOSMAR, +1

There are things our government has done that makes me shake my head. I can't stand the fact that whenever someone stops to explore the root cause of 9/11 that are immediatly demonized and labeled un-patriotic. You might as well stick your head in the sand if you believe that it was only because the terrorists hate freedom.
 
Marshall, This sounds like Gang activity. Are still in a street gang.
Our overthrow of the lawful elected leader of Iran in 53, and setting up a ruthless dictator so we could control the oil, Is the type of thug tactics I would expect from a criminal. Not from my government, in my name.

Guess my sarcasm still needs work. :rolleyes:


I guess Scottland, Spain and other countries were part of 1953 too?

You better be glad we did get a contract for buying the oil instead of a communist takeover of the country. How are those things in your driveway with four wheels and tires working out for you?

You know, this country, in my opinion, has done, under most all adminisrtations, what it has needed to do in the best interest of the US and it's citizens, at the time. All actions have reactions, some good, some not so good. We don't have crystal balls, our leaders try to make decisions based on what is in the national interest of this country, if in '53 it was oil and the prevention of the spread of communism, so be it.

What too many people on this site do is to point out events in history and what they see as faults, using those events in trying to make political points in debates without ever considering why we did what we did and what worse events may have happended if we hadn't. Moday morning QB's.


Additionally, regarding 9-11 and the murdering of 3000 innocent people, not even under the disguise of war, there is no justification.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top