JesseL
Member
6.5 Carcano - nobody in their right mind takes this one serious
Please tell me that wasn't a LHO joke.
6.5 Carcano - nobody in their right mind takes this one serious
That 243-50 sounds awesome.
4700 fps... Ouch?
Wouldn't that vaporize a normal 243 bullet just on impact with a paper target?
All I do is punch holes in paper with it, so I am not sure how much of the bullet is still there
No. Not a joke and not a reference to Lee Harvy Oswald nor Left Handed Operators.Quote:
6.5 Carcano - nobody in their right mind takes this one serious
Please tell me that wasn't a LHO joke.
Stick around in this sport long enough and the "oddballs" and wildcats become on-the-shelf commerical cartridges.
The Tourist said:Back to the debate, I actually believe that the reason we have so many wonderful cartridges is that somebody, somewhere did a lot of homework.
We know about Elmer Keith, but there are lots of guys, like P.O. Ackley for example, that many younger reloaders might not know.
I custom built a single shot action, and for reloading I simply annealed the neck of about 100 cases, sized them down and started at 230gr of H50BMG powder (by Hodgdon) and worked up from there. We clocked the round going about 4700 ft. per sec.
Makes a huge bang, kicks like a mule and knocks over boxes of ammo a few tables down at the range.
Haha! disintegrating bullets mid-flight. You ever shot anything with it? I'd like to see what it did on impact. I imagine weight retention didn't really occur, more like powder after impact moving about 4000 fps.
Still you would think it could have an application? I wonder what distances you could reach with heavier bullets...