Had a Camp 9. Trigger was atrocious. Have a Marlin 1894 in .44 Magnum but no handgun for the caliber. KelTec Sub2000 2.0 is fun at the range with some mods.
Kel-Tec Sub2000 ships with a trigger that is worse than the
worst trigger I ever felt on the worst BB gun I ever shot.
I own one. Pulling on that thing makes me feel like I'm gonna break something on the gun, and hurt myself all at once.
About $350 later, and every gee-gaw (including trigger gee-gaw) in the MCARBO catalog, and I think it will probably be a shooter. Or at least I might not hurt myself. Unless I let a spring fly out and hit me in the eye while I'm working on the trigger. Note to self: Order
extra Kel-Tec Sub2000 trigger springs.
Other than dry-firing the
Kel-Tec Sub2000 (to experience the godawful trigger and iron sights that aren't designed to fit any human head), I can't claim any more experience with it. Still gotta install all those MCARBO parts. I'm still on the fence about whether it was a good idea to get it. I like "tinkering" with guns that aren't expensive, but which can be made to "be a shooter." The Kel-Tec Sub2000 will definitely be a "project gun." I guess I'm OK with that. I didn't want ANOTHER AR-15. If you don't mind spending a significant amount of money on a Kel-Tec Sub2000, you can buy them now with the whole MCARBO catalog already installed on them. They aren't cheap at that point.
I've got an
AR in 300BLK.
300BLK is a "pistol caliber" - right? - Mine *might* be configured as a "pistol"
I'm VERY impressed with it. Especially since it has a $200 trigger in it. And $600 in optics, and a fairly expensive "solvent trap" suppressor, and tax stamp, and blah-blah, money-money... You know.
I kind of would like to have one of the
CZ-Scorpion guns with the "pistol brace."
But I'm not spending any more money on more PCC's until that "pistol brace" issue is put to rest for good with the courts.
I know I could just SBR one. But I'm kinda tired with playing all the Fluh-Fluh games with Bureau of Backside-Probing-and-Hassle-and-Humiliation.
I've got one of the
Smith and Wesson PCC's over here new in a box too. Its the version that folds in half and has the magazine through the grip. It might be interesting if I can find time for it. Easier to find time to SPEND MONEY on these things than it is to actually find time to DO STUFF with them. I would have never messed with the Smith and Wesson PCC, except there are such SMOKING DEALS on the M&P 9mm police-trade-in pistols, I'm already into Smith and Wessson 9mm magazines because of the pistols. Like I needed ANOTHER 9mm PISTOL. Might as well get one of those weird foldy carbines, right? Because all my friends will be smitten with it, and will want to hang out with me at the range and shoot up all my ammo. I can't even get them to show up.
Probably should get
ANOTHER CAN - a detachable one - that has a bore-size big enough to go on all sorts and sizes of pistols and PCC's. So more $$$ for a bunch of Gucci muzzle-attachment gizmos, and more federal paperwork. And isn't there something about a mandatory minimum sentence if you use any NFA item "unlawfully" in a shooting?
"Yeah, but that's just an add-on charge... the feds never get involved anyway unless you are a big fish." That's what they say. I heard. Because some guy on the internet...
Maybe if I got a
registered MP5. And loaded the magazines with MY AMMO for them. And policed-up all the mess when they're done. I know I'd be popular then. I'm sure of it.
Sigh....
And up until body armor became a lot more readily available, they were a good choice. These days though, with most pistol caliber vests defeating them, the shorty rifle caliber AR's just make more sense there.
