AnaxImperator said:
When my Wife & I bought our "dream" bikes after I reenlisted, we spent just over $10k on them. People often don't understand why we would sink that much coin on two mountainbikes when it's possible to buy two MTBs from Walmart for $500 max.
I guess the same goes for high-end handguns. If someone has the money, and that monsterous price-tag truly equates to quality, then why not?
Disaster said:
I wouldn't make that same analogy...maybe comparing a $8000 mountain bike to a $1500 dollar one, but not to a $500 Walmart one (actually, you'd be hard pressed to find any bike for more than $200 at Walmart.) Anyone who rides seriously, ie. on "real" mountain singletracks as opposed to bike paths, knows that you do get considerably more performance from high end bikes. In fact, cheap bikes become very bad values when they break or leave you stranded (I know, been there...done that.)
Avid mountainbikers are aware of the serious difference in bike & ride quality with a Walmart $150 NEXT MTB w/ cable rim brakes, 2" travel pogo-stick suspension, and a 40lb steel frame; compared to a $5000 Yeti 575 w/ hydraulic disc brakes, 6" travel pneumatic suspension, tubeless rims/tires, and a 28lb aluminum & carbon-fiber frame. But to the average Joe, a bike is a bike is a bike, and spending five-grand on one is a frivolous expenditure, no matter what parts are hung on it. I love meeting people huffing & puffing up a 5% grade on their 40lb, "10-speed" Walmart Special, and having them try my Santa Cruz. But even after the difference blows their minds, it's still a stretch to get them believing that $5000 for a mountainbike isn't a waste of money.
Expensive guns are a totally different animal. You really don't get much in the way of increased performance when you cross the triple digit price threshold. What you get is exclusivity and collectability.
I would equate to high end watches. A $15,000 Rolex doesn't keep any better time than a $100 Casio. People buy them because they like the look and the status and because they just like "fine" time pieces.
Your analogy between high-end firearms & expensive watches is a good one. I don't think that because a Nighthawk 1911 is valued at $3k means it's any more durable or accurate than a $1k S&W, but a $3k Nighthawk is certainly a huge step above a $150 Cobra or Raven in terms of function, fit & finish.... and according to some guns from Kel-Tec & Hi-Point can't hold a candle to S&Ws, Kimbers, H&Ks, and Walthers.
So to an extent with firearms, you still get what you pay for. (.... and I don't agree that Kel-Tecs & Hi-Points are necessarily shoddy.)
Even so, I've met plenty of serious bicycle riders that prefer older, heavier, less advanced & less expensive bikes, and often can easily drop guys riding those $5k wonder-bikes. The same goes for firearms; as long as a gun is in good condition & can reliably complete the job when required, it doesn't matter much if it's old, simple, heavy, has iron-sights only, a relatively low magazine capacity, and is was had for $200 at a pawn-shop. I'm a member of that school; I'll happily & confidently carry a Makarov or old S&W Model 27 in lieu of a new Sig or Springfield.... not that I have anything against them.
I'm sure there are those who would beg to differ, holding to the idea that 3-dot tritium or ghost-ring sights, sights that allow for single-handed cocking, ambidextrious safety/mag-releases, lasers/lights, muzzle compensators/porting, and high cartridge capacities are much-needed tactical advantages.... and that in a gunfight having every technical advantage possible regardless of cost, seriously tips the odds in the good-guy's favor.
I don't disagree with that, but I think there's a point of diminishing returns when outfitting a defensive firearm with lots of custom extras. I'd just rather have a sidearm with the least amount of controls and snag-points, so that when I have to draw fast or am still groggy after waking up to a bump-in-th'-night, there's no fumbling with buttons/switches or because of a snag on clothing.
weisse52 said:
Please don't ask what I spent on my last bicycle or the steel lugged custom frame I am waiting on. (18 month wait)
Phydeaux642 said:
weisse52, is it a Rivendell frame? Waterford perhaps?
I'd kill to have a Rivendell Bombadil.... Or a Retrotec Double w/ 650B hoops.