A different way to look at procurement data . . .
355sigfan,
With respect, is it possible that revolvers are “fading into history†for LEOs because departmental firearms standards (maintenance and upkeep, mechanical proficiency and understanding, accuracy, mandatory qualification standards, required range time, and so forth) have generally declined with time? Many threads (here, on TFL and elsewhere) have lamented the overall lack of contemporary LEO interest in firearms, especially in comparison to decades past. Under those circumstances, an affordable, high-capacity, tactical -- not target -- accurate, very simple/durable/reliable handgun would be quite sensible, which may (in part, in addition to acquisition cost and marketing) explain law enforcement’s extensive use of Glocks.