P.B.Walsh
Member
Both have their advantages and disavantages.
1. Reliability (both general feeding reliability and positive extraction)
2. Lower sight line (better for close-in shots)
3. Lighter weight
4. Easier to shoot from a benchrest for sighting in
5. (very marginal advantage) More "politically correct" looking which could matter to some in some circumstances
4. i'm afraid i don't follow your logic on this one
(6.5lbs vs 7.5-8.5 lbs depending on BDL vs VSS, and that's with a fluted barrel).
I can see where he was coming from. The extended magazine makes benchrest shooting more difficult.
I think this thread has gone far enough.
...except that the heavier bolt gun shoots a superior cartridge. For every neat-o round the AR-15 will shoot, there's a much better one that fits in standard bolt actions.
once you stick a scope on a bolt gun, you lose this advantage.
Ermm, no not really, not to the extent that I mean. A low-ish mounted scope on a turnbolt has around 1.5" of height over the bore line; whereas a low-mounted scope on an AR is still around 2.75" over the bore. That means you'll hit 2.75" low at 5 yards, over an inch further away from the point of aim than with a turnbolt.
Well sure. There are plenty of places where an AR is quite legal for hunting. However, there are countries where this is not the case. While you could certainly stay home, many of those countries offer desirable hunting opportunities, e.g. South Africa, Canada, Namibia, etc.I live in California. You CAN use AR style rifles to hunt in this state, it just has to be .30 caliber or higher.
AB, apparently it's not the caliber, it's the platform. You can use a Bad Thing if it has a more socially acceptable cartridge. Might include some "5-round magazine" deal, as well. But, I dunno...