I only have a Cz-82 and a Mosin Nagant. If I was in a desperate situation the cz would go to my brother and I would be stuck with my range gun and I wouldn't feel unarmed. People at the gun store judged me for having a 9x18 mak for home defense.
My wife likes to blast cans with a 9410 shotgun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinJ
Because a .22 is cheap to shoot. I enjoy shooting my Winchester 94 but wouldn't use it for SD. Same for Mosin Nagant and M1 carbine.
A M1 Carbine is a rather efficient weapon out to about 100 yds, especially if you use soft or hollowpoints. They're even fun to shoot.
As few people in this country (since frontier days) seem to have been mugged by a thug from 50 or 100 yards, other than near the Austin tower in 1966, it's really hard to imagine why any rifle, especially an FAL or M-1A etc, is needed for defense from people.
Many appear to be counting (one day) on an actual "Road Warrior" situation, to help justify their investments. A few of them are at "SKSboards".
I get it.I have firearms that I would use in defense of my life but I also have many that are mostly for fun.
I don't follow...? Do you mean they are like 'safe-queens' or collection pieces?I know this may anger some people but I have many guns that are toys.
That's an excellent idea!We need color-coded name tags for range use so we know who to talk to.
I had a grad school professor way back when who thought this up for conferences:
White - I'm serious, talk to me about business
White/Red - Let's get a drink and talk some shop
Red - Give me a beer/where's the women at?
If the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms, should that really pertain to firearms that are just for recreation?