yhtomit
Member
Noticed the nearby thread on .45 Super, and rather than hijack it, am starting this one with a related question: Why aren't more guns made in .45 Super? It seems (naive, but then, so am I) that a gun in .45 Super can also fire .45ACP, so wouldn't it be at the very least good marketing for a company like Springfield to make / sell / advertise their .45s as "multi-caliber" guns? (Like the various revolvers that can fire both hopped-up and toned-down variants, 357 Magnum v. 38 Special, for instance.)
Is it that the stronger springs etc. used for .45 Super are in some way inappropriate for firing conventional (ACP) ammo? Is it that barrels need to be hugely heavier and therefore hurt smaller .45ACP guns as CCW choices? Production costs / testing? Fear of lawsuit when some idiot assumes that *every* .45 shoots Super?
In short, why is my XD45 not built for .45 Super? At least for now, there's no way I'd be shooting .45 Super unless it was magically cheaper than .45ACP, but options are always good.
timothy
Is it that the stronger springs etc. used for .45 Super are in some way inappropriate for firing conventional (ACP) ammo? Is it that barrels need to be hugely heavier and therefore hurt smaller .45ACP guns as CCW choices? Production costs / testing? Fear of lawsuit when some idiot assumes that *every* .45 shoots Super?
In short, why is my XD45 not built for .45 Super? At least for now, there's no way I'd be shooting .45 Super unless it was magically cheaper than .45ACP, but options are always good.
timothy